Register ICMag Forum Menu Features
You are viewing our:
in:
Forums > Marijuana Growing > Nutrients and Fertilizers > By far and without a doubt, the least expensive conventional, synthetic fertilizers

Thread Title Search
Click for RX Green Solutions
Post Reply
By far and without a doubt, the least expensive conventional, synthetic fertilizers Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 06-04-2011, 05:49 PM #121
IwannatokeNbone
I luv making new crosses, ive got fuck all a clue what im doing but its fun as hell

IwannatokeNbone's Avatar

Join Date: May 2010
Posts: 802
IwannatokeNbone has a spectacular aura aboutIwannatokeNbone has a spectacular aura aboutIwannatokeNbone has a spectacular aura aboutIwannatokeNbone has a spectacular aura about
all the grow methods like kiss or ''the cheapest'' are just a one part bandwagon thread usually, there seems to be no diversity as everyone just wants to copy either maxi bloom or jacks, if they work great but what wont work? not sure if theres a bloom nute out there by a company that doesnt work, i think were kidding ourselves that were buying differant dry ferts or diff wet ferts that have some kind of special tap water in them, its all the same stuff im afraid.
IwannatokeNbone is offline Quote


1 members found this post helpful.
Old 06-04-2011, 07:33 PM #122
YosemiteSam
Guest

Posts: n/a
If you are saying the raw salts are the same whether we get them from a nute company or buy them ourselves you are mostly correct...although there are a few things available that some of us use that I have not seen used by nute companies.

If you are saying we all end up using basically the same ratios you are totally wrong. I am way closer to Steiner ratios than anything a nute company puts out. Start going high on Ca...say a 3:2 ratio with K:Ca and find me a nute company that does that. It takes some imagination to get there.

It ain't for everyone. But don't simply dismiss what you don't understand. it can be very rewarding.
Quote


1 members found this post helpful.
Old 06-05-2011, 01:44 AM #123
turbolaser4528
Senior Member

turbolaser4528's Avatar

Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 1,264
turbolaser4528 is a jewel in the roughturbolaser4528 is a jewel in the roughturbolaser4528 is a jewel in the roughturbolaser4528 is a jewel in the roughturbolaser4528 is a jewel in the roughturbolaser4528 is a jewel in the roughturbolaser4528 is a jewel in the rough
Yes, most regular nutrients require a cal-mag or Si supplement.


With the salts, can one use gram sized spoons instead of a scale to measure? (legal repercussions of having scale near grow)

YosemiteSam's plants speak for themselves. Never seen 3-4 lb plants that healthy in coco!

Great thread btw.
turbolaser4528 is offline Quote


Old 06-05-2011, 02:38 AM #124
woolybear
Senior Member

woolybear's Avatar

Join Date: Aug 2010
Posts: 1,963
woolybear is a glorious beacon of lightwoolybear is a glorious beacon of lightwoolybear is a glorious beacon of lightwoolybear is a glorious beacon of lightwoolybear is a glorious beacon of lightwoolybear is a glorious beacon of lightwoolybear is a glorious beacon of lightwoolybear is a glorious beacon of lightwoolybear is a glorious beacon of lightwoolybear is a glorious beacon of lightwoolybear is a glorious beacon of light
I have started using the Jack's Bloom Booster on my crops. Will be able to do a comparison with my dansk diesel and some other plants.
woolybear is offline Quote


Old 06-05-2011, 07:07 PM #125
IwannatokeNbone
I luv making new crosses, ive got fuck all a clue what im doing but its fun as hell

IwannatokeNbone's Avatar

Join Date: May 2010
Posts: 802
IwannatokeNbone has a spectacular aura aboutIwannatokeNbone has a spectacular aura aboutIwannatokeNbone has a spectacular aura aboutIwannatokeNbone has a spectacular aura about
Quote:
Originally Posted by YosemiteSam View Post
If you are saying the raw salts are the same whether we get them from a nute company or buy them ourselves you are mostly correct...although there are a few things available that some of us use that I have not seen used by nute companies.

If you are saying we all end up using basically the same ratios you are totally wrong. I am way closer to Steiner ratios than anything a nute company puts out. Start going high on Ca...say a 3:2 ratio with K:Ca and find me a nute company that does that. It takes some imagination to get there.

It ain't for everyone. But don't simply dismiss what you don't understand. it can be very rewarding.

can u elaborate on steiners ratios more please, u mean rudolf's? if so please tell, he was pretty interesting, i feel that if u dont over N your plant in there life and give them the other nutes they generally do quite well, 20-20-20 will work all the way through, the plant knows what to take n what to leave behind
IwannatokeNbone is offline Quote


0 members found this post helpful.
Old 06-05-2011, 10:11 PM #126
YosemiteSam
Guest

Posts: n/a
This is Steiner...it is a tomato formula. Oddly enough I find it to work very well for marijuana. I go a little higher on Mg although I am currently experimenting to see if that is needed. K is always about double N. Ca is very high compared to any bottled nute deal.

Transplant to 4th Cluster
70-90 24 150-200 9 0 2 5 1.5 1 0.5 0.2 0.1 0.1
4th Cluster to 6th Cluster
Parts Per Million 90-110
40 200-250 100-150 40 2.5 2 1 0.4 0.2 0.1
6th Cluster to Maturity
110-125 48 250-300 150-175 50 3 2 1 0.4 0.2 0.1
Quote


Old 06-05-2011, 10:14 PM #127
blank85
Banned

Join Date: Jun 2010
Posts: 120
blank85 will become famous soon enough
Quote:
Originally Posted by IwannatokeNbone View Post
can u elaborate on steiners ratios more please, u mean rudolf's? if so please tell, he was pretty interesting, i feel that if u dont over N your plant in there life and give them the other nutes they generally do quite well, 20-20-20 will work all the way through, the plant knows what to take n what to leave behind
Its about having the right nutrients available at all times. Its all in the ratio. I wouldn't feed a plant 20-20-20 throughout its entire life. Got to cut back on N during flowering.

If you mix a solution with too much N dont expect your plant to not absorb any "because it knows what it wants." This is stupid thinking.
blank85 is offline Quote


1 members found this post helpful.
Old 06-05-2011, 11:34 PM #128
tester
Member

Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 284
tester will become famous soon enoughtester will become famous soon enoughtester will become famous soon enough
The other thing is even if plant "knows what it want's", it doesn't want the same thing as the grower does.
It wants to survive, while the grower want's a dead plant with high cannabinod content.
Classic example is excess N that leads to delayed flowering, harder to root clones, makes the plant more susceptible to pests, bigger yield but lower cannabinoid content etc.

A lot of NPK ratios (excuse me Spurr) works, but we don't know which one is the best (under given environment in the aspect of yield and cannabinoid content.)

Since relatively small differences in yield can make huge differences in profit (for example +/-10 grams per plant mean nothing in case of tomatoes, but means something with cannabis.)
That's why I would like to choose the best NPK profile even if the difference is "small" when it comes to harvest.
tester is offline Quote


1 members found this post helpful.
Old 06-06-2011, 01:49 AM #129
IwannatokeNbone
I luv making new crosses, ive got fuck all a clue what im doing but its fun as hell

IwannatokeNbone's Avatar

Join Date: May 2010
Posts: 802
IwannatokeNbone has a spectacular aura aboutIwannatokeNbone has a spectacular aura aboutIwannatokeNbone has a spectacular aura aboutIwannatokeNbone has a spectacular aura about
i spoke about nitrogen earlier, to much is usually a problem starter in some form.
IwannatokeNbone is offline Quote


0 members found this post helpful.
Old 06-06-2011, 02:54 PM #130
blank85
Banned

Join Date: Jun 2010
Posts: 120
blank85 will become famous soon enough
Quote:
Originally Posted by IwannatokeNbone View Post
i spoke about nitrogen earlier, to much is usually a problem starter in some form.
Duh. So where your plants dude.... seriously?
blank85 is offline Quote


Post Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off


All times are GMT +2. The time now is 05:13 PM.


Click to Upgrade your account


This site is for educational and entertainment purposes only.
You must be of legal age to view ICmag and participate here.
All postings are the responsibility of their authors.
Powered by: vBulletin Copyright ©2000 - 2018, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.