What's new

"Ethiopia the cradle of mankind”

sirgrassalot

Domesticator of Cannabis
Veteran
picture.php


Before “Lucy,” There Was “Ardi”: First Major Analysis of One of Earliest Known Hominids.


[ILLUSTRATION] Probable life appearance of "Ardi" [Illustration © 2009, J.H. Matternes]


picture.php


Probable life appearance of "Ardi," a drawing based on a partial fossilized skeleton from a female Ardipithecus ramidus who weighed about about 50 kilograms (110 pounds) and stood about 120 centimeters (just under 4 feet) tall.


In a special issue of Science, an international team of scientists has for the first time thoroughly described Ardipithecus ramidus, a hominid species that lived 4.4 million years ago in what is now Ethiopia. This research, in the form of 11 detailed papers and more general summaries, was published today in the journal's 2 October 2009 issue. Science is published by AAAS, the nonprofit science society.

The package of research offers the first comprehensive, peer-reviewed description of the Ardipithecus fossils, which include a partial skeleton of a female, nicknamed “Ardi.” Publication of the new research was the subject of simultaneous news conferences today in the Ethiopian capital of Addis Ababa, and at AAAS/Science headquarters in Washington, D.C., with major international news media quickly conveying the story to a worldwide audience.

“What we celebrate here today are the results of a scientific mission to the very deep past,” said Tim White of the University of California Berkeley, one of the lead authors of the research, at the AAAS news conference.

The discovery and publication of the research is “an extraordinary event,” Samuel Assefa, Ethiopian ambassador to the United States, said at AAAS. “The deeper point for all of us is a deeper sense of our interconnectedness.”

Alan I. Leshner, chief executive officer of AAAS and executive publisher of Science, called the publication “truly a landmark event in our understanding of human origins.”

The last common ancestor shared by humans and chimpanzees is thought to have lived six million or more years ago. Though Ardipithecus is not itself this last common ancestor, it likely shared many of this ancestor's characteristics. For comparison, Ardipithecus is more than a million years older than “Lucy,” the partial female skeleton of Australopithecus afarensis. Until the discovery of the new Ardipithecus remains, the fossil record contained scant evidence of other hominids older than Australopithecus.


Through an analysis of the skull, teeth, pelvis, hands, feet and other bones, the researchers have determined that Ardipithecus had a mix of “primitive” traits, shared with its predecessors, the primates of the Miocene epoch, and “derived” traits, which it shares exclusively with later hominids.

Because of its antiquity, Ardipithecus takes us closer to the still-elusive last common ancestor. However, many of its traits do not appear in modern-day African apes. One surprising conclusion, therefore, is that it is likely that the African apes have evolved extensively since we shared that last common ancestor, which thus makes living chimpanzees and gorillas poor models for the last common ancestor and for understanding our own evolution since that time.

“In Ardipithecus we have an unspecialized form that hasn't evolved very far in the direction of Australopithecus,” said White, a professor at the Human Evolution Research Center and the Department of Integrative Biology at the

University of California at Berkeley. “So when you go from head to toe, you're seeing a mosaic creature that is neither chimpanzee, nor is it human. It is Ardipithecus.”

“With such a complete skeleton, and with so many other individuals of the same species at the same time horizon, we can really understand the biology of this hominid,” Gen Suwa of the University of Tokyo, the project paleoanthropologist and also a lead Science author, said in an interview.

C. Owen Lovejoy, a professor of anthropology at Kent State University in Ohio, reconstructed the “Lucy” skeleton and was a lead researcher and author on the “Ardi” project. He called the “Ardi” skeleton “a treasure-trove of surprises” and “one of the most revealing hominid fossils I ever could have imagined.”

Brooks Hanson, deputy editor for physical sciences at Science, hailed the importance of the work, calling it “one of those special and wonderful moments in science.”

“These articles contain an enormous amount of data collected and analyzed through a major international research effort,” Hanson said. “They throw open a window into a period of human evolution we have known little about, when early hominids were establishing themselves in Africa, soon after diverging from the last ancestor they shared with the African apes.

“Science is delighted to be publishing this wealth of new information, which gives us important new insights into the roots of hominid evolution and into what makes humans unique among primates,” said Hanson.

The special collection of Science articles is published 150 years after the publication of Charles Darwin's “On the Origin of Species.” The special issue begins with an overview paper that summarizes the main findings of this research effort. In this article, White and his coauthors introduce their discovery of over 110 Ardipithecus specimens, including a partial skeleton with much of the skull, hands, feet, limbs and pelvis. This individual, “Ardi,” was a female who weighed about 50 kilograms (110 pounds) and stood about 120 centimeters (just under 4 feet) tall.

Until now, researchers have generally assumed that chimpanzees, gorillas, and other modern African apes have retained many of the traits of the last ancestor they shared with humans--in other words, this presumed ancestor was thought to be much more chimpanzee-like than human-like. For example, it would have been adapted for swinging and hanging from tree branches, and perhaps walked on its knuckles while on the ground.

Ardipithecus challenges these assumptions, however. These hominids appear to have lived in a woodland environment, where they climbed on all fours along tree branches--as some of the Miocene primates did--and walked, upright, on two legs, while on the ground. They do not appear to have been knuckle-walkers, or to have spent much time swinging and hanging from tree-branches, especially as chimps do. Overall, the findings suggest that hominids and African apes have each followed different evolutionary pathways, and we can no longer consider chimps as “proxies” for our last common ancestor.

“Darwin was very wise on this matter,” said White.

“Darwin said we have to be really careful,” he added. “The only way we're really going to know what this last common ancestor looked like is to go and find it. Well, at 4.4 million years ago we found something pretty close to it. And, just like Darwin appreciated, evolution of the ape lineages and the human lineage has been going on independently since the time those lines split, since that last common ancestor we shared.”

The special issue of Science includes an overview article, three articles that describe the environment Ardipithecus inhabited, five that analyze specific parts of Ardipithecus' anatomy, and two that discuss what this new body of scientific information may imply for human evolution.

Altogether, 47 different authors from around the world contributed to the total study of Ardipithecus and its environment. The primary authors are Tim White of the University of California, Berkeley; Berhane Asfaw of Rift Valley Research Service in Addis Ababa; Giday WoldeGabriel of Los Alamos National Laboratory; Gen Suwa of the University of Tokyo; and C. Owen Lovejoy of Kent State University.

“These are the results of a mission to our deep African past,” WoldeGabriel, project co-director and geologist, said before his appearance at AAAS.

“Ardi's” bones will be quartered at the Ethiopian National Museum, where there's already a significant “Lucy” exhibit. WoldeGabriel reminded reporters at AAAS of the extensive collections of hominid fossils discovered in his nation, some dated to 6 million years ago. “Ethiopia can rightly claim to be the cradle of mankind,” he said.

The research was funded by the National Science Foundation; the Institute of Geophysics and Planetary Physics of the University of California at Los Alamos National Laboratory (LANL); the Japan Society for the Promotion of Science; and others.

http://www.aaas.org/news/releases/2009/1001sp_ardi.shtml
 
M

MoldyFrogToe

Kickass, history kicks ass, biology does, evolution does, and so does KNOWING
 
M

MoldyFrogToe

Yeah. Evolution is pretty crazy, taking an ape and turnning it into a man over a few million years
 
D

danny karey

Thats f'n cool!!!! One more nail in the coffin for the Catholic church's bullshit theory of creation.............YAY!!!

Danny
 

mean mr.mustard

I Pass Satellites
Veteran
Oh... I see... this is supposed to be another creation vs evolution thread.

In that case, how do you know that just because life evolves that it didn't start somewhere?
 

ddrew

Active member
Veteran
picture.php


picture.php



Ardipithecus challenges these assumptions, however. These hominids appear to have lived in a woodland environment, where they climbed on all fours along tree branches--as some of the Miocene primates did--and walked, upright, on two legs, while on the ground. They do not appear to have been knuckle-walkers, or to have spent much time swinging and hanging from tree-branches, especially as chimps do. Overall, the findings suggest that hominids and African apes have each followed different evolutionary pathways, and we can no longer consider chimps as “proxies” for our last common ancestor.

Guys, take time to read the article, it's saying that we are NOT evolved from apes, but that apes and humans shared a common ancestor and both followed different evolutionary paths to get where we are today.


I read about this yesterday.
Huge find
 

mean mr.mustard

I Pass Satellites
Veteran
Hey I read it :D

I wanted to point out that the two theories of creation and evolution fit together.

I should just wash my hands and walk away now...
 
M

MoldyFrogToe

Guys, take time to read the article, it's saying that we are NOT evolved from apes, but that apes and humans shared a common ancestor and both followed different evolutionary paths to get where we are today.


I read about this yesterday.
Huge find
And what was that common ancestor....something similar to an ape =)
 

ddrew

Active member
Veteran
And what was that common ancestor....something similar to an ape =)
Or similar to a human, or some combo of both, who knows, they just found this thing, they may still find the common ancestor.
I just know it won't be the skeleton of some white guy they find in an ancient garden from 6000 years ago.
 
H

h^2 O

good thread
Ardipithecus is not necessarily our direct ancestor - there were hundreds of bipedal apes that evolved and became extinct. People used to think Australopithecus afarensis (Lucy) was our ancestor - but it turned out Orrorin tugenensis had more human-like teeth than Lucy - and was also about 4 million years older than Lucy
PErhaps both Lucy and Ardipithecus are not our ancestors and are merely great aunts or 4th or 5th cousins...
 
H

h^2 O

Guys, take time to read the article, it's saying that we are NOT evolved from apes, but that apes and humans shared a common ancestor and both followed different evolutionary paths to get where we are today.


I read about this yesterday.
Huge find
yes that's correct - sort of. Extant (living) apes like gorilla and chimp share a common ancestor with us, which they think lived @ 8million years ago. We've been becoming human for 8 million years, and chimps have been becoming chimps for 8 million years. What's really cool is that we are actually more related to chimps than chimps are to orangutans. There's charts n stuff, smoke a bowl and google some fun facts
 

sirgrassalot

Domesticator of Cannabis
Veteran
Some people still prefer to shave in the dark.

picture.php


The lines that evolved into modern humans and living apes probably shared an ancestor 6 million to 7 million years ago, White said in a telephone interview.


But Ardi has many traits that do not appear in modern-day African apes, leading to the conclusion that the apes evolved extensively since we shared that last common ancestor.

A study of Ardi, under way since the first bones were discovered in 1994, indicates the species lived in the woodlands and could climb on all fours along tree branches, but the development of their arms and legs indicates they didn’t spend much time in the trees. And they could walk upright, on two legs, when on the ground.


WASHINGTON (AP) — The story of humankind is reaching back another million years as scientists learn more about “Ardi,” a hominid who lived 4.4 million years ago in what is now Ethiopia.

The 110-pound, 4-foot female roamed forests a million years before the famous Lucy, long studied as the earliest skeleton of a human ancestor.

This older skeleton reverses the common wisdom of human evolution, said anthropologist C. Owen Lovejoy of Kent State University.

Rather than humans evolving from an ancient chimp-like creature, the new find provides evidence that chimps and humans evolved from some long-ago common ancestor — but each evolved and changed separately along the way.

“This is not that common ancestor, but it’s the closest we have ever been able to come,” said Tim White, director of the Human Evolution Research Center at the University of California, Berkeley.


Formally dubbed Ardipithecus ramidus — which means root of the ground ape — the find is detailed in 11 research papers published Thursday by the journal Science.

“This is one of the most important discoveries for the study of human evolution,” said David Pilbeam, curator of paleoanthropology at Harvard’s Peabody Museum of Archaeology and Ethnology.

“It is relatively complete in that it preserves head, hands, feet and some critical parts in between. It represents a genus plausibly ancestral to Australopithecus — itself ancestral to our genus Homo,” said Pilbeam, who was not part of the research teams.

Scientists assembled the skeleton from 125 pieces.

Lucy, also found in Africa, thrived a million years after Ardi and was of the more human-like genus Australopithecus.

“In Ardipithecus we have an unspecialized form that hasn’t evolved very far in the direction of Australopithecus. So when you go from head to toe, you’re seeing a mosaic creature that is neither chimpanzee, nor is it human. It is Ardipithecus,” said White.


Some details about Ardi in the collection of papers:

— Ardi was found in Ethiopia’s Afar Rift, where many fossils of ancient plants and animals have been discovered. Findings near the skeleton indicate that at the time it was a wooded environment. Fossils of 29 species of birds and 20 species of small mammals were found at the site.

— Geologist Giday WoldeGabriel of Los Alamos National Laboratory was able to use volcanic layers above and below the fossil to date it to 4.4 million years ago.

— Ardi’s upper canine teeth are more like the stubby ones of modern humans than the long, sharp, pointed ones of male chimpanzees and most other primates. An analysis of the tooth enamel suggests a diverse diet, including fruit and other woodland-based foods such as nuts and leaves.

— Paleoanthropologist Gen Suwa of the University of Tokyo reported that Ardi’s face had a projecting muzzle, giving her an ape-like appearance. But it didn’t thrust forward quite as much as the lower faces of modern African apes do. Some features of her skull, such as the ridge above the eye socket, are quite different from those of chimpanzees. The details of the bottom of the skull, where nerves and blood vessels enter the brain, indicate that Ardi’s brain was positioned in a way similar to modern humans, possibly suggesting that the hominid brain may have been already poised to expand areas involving aspects of visual and spatial perception.

— Ardi’s hand and wrist were a mix of primitive traits and a few new ones, but they don’t include the hallmark traits of the modern tree-hanging, knuckle-walking chimps and gorillas. She had relatively short palms and fingers which were flexible, allowing her to support her body weight on her palms while moving along tree branches, but she had to be a careful climber because she lacked the anatomical features that allow modern-day African apes to swing, hang and easily move through the trees.

— The pelvis and hip show the gluteal muscles were positioned so she could walk upright.

— Her feet were rigid enough for walking but still had a grasping big toe for use in climbing.


http://www.sciencemag.org
 
Top