|
in:
|
|
| Forums > IC Magazine > USA Cannabis Scene: State By State > California > The current War on Medical Cannabis in California | ||
| The current War on Medical Cannabis in California | Thread Tools |
|
|
#1 | |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
The current War on Medical Cannabis in California
I have been seeing an effort to continue the fight on Cannabis in California and that fight is being focused on the Medical people.
I have been unable to focus on one story or article but today i found an article that I believe will kick off a proper thread. Now that the right to form collectives and coops has been affirmed by our California Supreme court we still have a movement of Hate against the Medical Cannabis community and perhaps the war will be fought from house to house and job to job. Here is a small article from a town I know very Well. I lived in the Inland Empire and know it well.. Coalition discusses ways to fight marijuana dispensaries Liset M rquez, Staff Writer Created: 09/25/2009 06:06:34 PM PDT Quote:
So these people don't know the difference between Adults and Children. Never mind that coops are legal. they are planning to go after cannabis people anyway they can. With Claremont they didn't go after the Cannabis they went after the Zoning. That's like requiring a poor person to own property in order to vote. Most people don't have the room to grow their own so a place to go in the Inland Empire is needed and they know that. So if you have news from other Areas of California please post them in this thread. I believe we are seeing an organized effort to harm citizens of California and that is a criminal activity. |
|
|
|
|
|
#2 | ||
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Planet Stupid
Posts: 1,612
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Quote:
Quote:
Once again we have an issue of semantics, but, semantics are very important in law as critical language goes to the very heart of legislation and court decisions regarding the enforcement of legislation. Essentially, 37100 limits the power of government, just as our Constitution does. The legislators could have written, "...The legislative body may pass ordinances not in conflict with the Constitution and laws of the State and the United States.", but they didn't, choosing to use the word or instead. Regardless of the semantics issue, 37100 doesn't even mention the word business and it takes a pretty hefty stretch of the imagination to interpret 37100 as applying to each and every business in the state because it is specifically written to limit the powers of local governments. The drug warriors are getting desperate! Those city councils that try to write these anti-mmj laws need to be brought to task and reminded that they too have to follow the law. I hope that the recent decision allowing communities to be sued for their actions will make the drug warriors posing as public officials to think twice before enacting ill-advised ordinances outlawing mmj facilities. PC |
||
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Member
Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 491
![]() ![]() |
brenda chabot and her husband are tools of the federal goverment much as the feds violated state law by advertising against state ballot propositions.these 2 pieces of shiite recieve their funding from federal grants,isn't that nice? your paying for these two fucknuts propoganda.major media sucks when they don't point these facts out or opposing viewpoint revealing their true bias and total irrelevance in all things political.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Looks to me that the distraction has run it's course.
While folks are still hating medical people there is a bigger fish now.. legalization.. So we shall see... |
|
|
|
|
#5 | |
|
Registered MedUser
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 416
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|