Register ICMag Forum Menu Features
You are viewing our:
in:
Forums > IC Magazine > USA Cannabis Scene: State By State > California > San Diego DUI Attorney Challenges Marijuana DUI Laws

Thread Title Search
Click to buy cannabis seeds at Ace Seeds
Post Reply
San Diego DUI Attorney Challenges Marijuana DUI Laws Thread Tools
Old 09-03-2009, 10:08 PM #1
JackTheGrower
Guest

Posts: n/a
San Diego DUI Attorney Challenges Marijuana DUI Laws

I actually believe one can be under the influence and not have a problem driving myself.
Given the choice of a driver that has drank a lot or one the has smoked a lot I pick the smoke a lot driver every time.

How do you feel?

San Diego DUI Attorney Challenges Marijuana DUI Laws

Quote:
SAN DIEGO, Sept. 3 /PRNewswire/ -- San Diego DUI lawyer Lawrence Taylor claims
that California DUI laws should not be applied to marijuana usage. Unlike
alcohol and many drugs, he says, marijuana probably does not impair driving.

Taylor, known nationally as "The Dean of DUI Attorneys," argues that although
it has always been assumed that cannabis, like alcohol, affects the ability to
safely operate a motor vehicle, the studies do not support that.

On the one hand, the California Department of Justice has found that marijuana
impairs psychomotor abilities that are functionally related to driving,
particularly at high-dose levels or among inexperienced users. ("Marijuana and
Alcohol: A Driver Performance Study," California Office of Traffic Safety
Project No. 087902)

However, the San Diego DUI defense attorney points out, two federal studies
contradict this.

In one, the U.S. Department of Transportation conducted DUI research with a
fully interactive simulator on the effects of alcohol and marijuana, alone and
in combination, on driver-controlled behavior and performance. Although
alcohol was found consistently and significantly to cause impairment,
marijuana had only an occasional effect.

Accidents and speeding tickets reliably increased with alcohol, but no
marijuana or combined alcohol-marijuana influence was noted. ("The Effects of
Alcohol on Driver-Controlled Behavior in a Driving Simulator, Phase
I"(DOT-HS-806-414).)

Taylor, who heads a large firm of DUI attorneys with offices in Los Angeles,
San Diego, Orange County, Riverside and San Francisco, points to another more
recent report. Entitled "Marijuana and Actual Performance" (DOT-HS-808-078),
it also found that "THC is not a profoundly impairing drug....It apparently
affects controlled information processing in a variety of laboratory tests,
but not to the extent which is beyond the individual's ability to control when
he is motivated and permitted to do so in driving."

The researchers found that it "appears not possible to conclude anything about
a driver's impairment on the basis of his/her plasma concentrations of THC and
THC-COOH determined in a single sample."

THC, Taylor explains, is the intoxicating ingredient in marijuana, and is
fairly quickly converted by the body into inactive metabolites -- which can
stay in the body for hours or even days. But it is these metabolites that
police are measuring in blood tests taken after drunk driving arrests.

In other words, the San Diego DUI lawyer says, (1) marijuana may not impair
driving ability at all, and (2) the blood "evidence" only measures an inactive
substance which may have been there for days.

For more information, visit the firm's website at
https://sandiego.duicentral.com/. Inquiries may be directed to the firm's San
Diego office: 619.232.5034.

About THE LAW OFFICES OF LAWRENCE TAYLOR
The Law Offices of Lawrence Taylor has specialized in DUI defense exclusively
for 29 years, and is unique in having a staff of former California DUI law
enforcement experts. The firm's California DUI defense attorneys serve clients
statewide from offices in Los Angeles, San Diego, Orange County, Riverside and
San Francisco.
Quote


Old 09-04-2009, 01:27 AM #2
SwitchAvenger
Guest

Posts: n/a
I read this and kind of laughed at my self for a couple. I personally (and i DO NOT suggest this to anyone) have driven under the influence of both. Personally i do have a little more control when high then drunk but I'm way more careful when I'm drunk because it's easier to detected alcohol upfront then it is MJ when it's masked up.

It's really up to the person at hand. Some people get smashed and get false courage and think they are gods with an unguided missile AKA automobile. Just the other day someone ended up killing them self's by hitting a pizza shop sign at 105 MPH around my area. But thats also the difference in blacking out while driving and chilling with a buzz.

Good luck with everything going over there, I still hope the federal government will gain a brain cell, but that's not going to happen anytime soon (not going to go into how i really feel due to the sake of argument)
Quote


Old 02-27-2015, 09:02 AM #3
Cody005
Newbie

Join Date: Feb 2015
Posts: 1
Cody005 is on a distinguished road
Yeah I even I agree this is not something which I can say will happen in next year or even next couple of years. Though many of DUI lawyer are pushing for the changes but going by history, this ain’t going to happen anytime soon.
Cody005 is offline Quote


Post Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off


All times are GMT +2. The time now is 12:05 PM.


Click to Visit Seedsman for Cannabis Seeds


This site is for educational and entertainment purposes only.
You must be of legal age to view ICmag and participate here.
All postings are the responsibility of their authors.
Powered by: vBulletin Copyright ©2000 - 2018, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.