|
in:
|
|
| Forums > Talk About It! > Old Stoners Crash Pad > Pot growers deal self inflicted black eye to our credibility | ||
| Pot growers deal self inflicted black eye to our credibility | Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#1 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Pot growers deal self inflicted black eye to our credibility
This is just so ridiculous on so many levels I hardly know where to begin placing responsibility. For sure they shoud have acted like grown ups.
============================ $1.610 awarded over pot stench By QUINCY CROMER The Daily Journal A Redwood Valley man was awarded a $1,610 verdict last week after a four-day jury trial against his former neighbors for damages caused by their marijuana growing operation. The lawsuit was filed by James Kerr in Mendocino County Superior Court Sept. 17, 2004, alleging that his former tenants -- James and Nancy Matthews -- had created a nuisance and should be held liable. According to California Civil Code, a nuisance is "anything which is injurious to health, or is indecent or offensive to the senses, so as to interfere with the comfortable enjoyment of life or property." Kerr claimed the "skunk-like" stench caused by approximately 100 marijuana plants the Matthewses were growing interfered with the use and enjoyment of his property. The lawsuit also claimed the Matthewses applied "toxic pesticides" to their marijuana plants, which were then sold to a local cannabis club. Advertisement The Matthewses -- represented by Timothy Morrison of Mason and Morrison in Ukiah -- filed a cross-complaint against Kerr, alleging intentional infliction of emotional distress, and both lawsuits were consolidated with Kerr's eviction case against his former tenants. After winning on all counts and being awarded $1,610, Kerr said that even though the judgment amount was small, he feels his rights were vindicated. "This wasn't about the money. It also wasn't about the people's right to legally grow and use medical marijuana, which I support," Kerr said. "It's just that when people do grow marijuana, they have to be sensitive and respectful of their neighbors' rights too. And one of those rights is the right to not be assaulted by offensive odors day and night, for weeks or months on end." Morrison said the Matthewses were permitted to grow medical marijuana under their rental agreement and that the verdict shows the nuisance was not significant. "The Matthews position was, in a nutshell, that he (Kerr) had consented and actually put in his contract that they could grow medical marijuana on the premises, and they essentially accused him of harassing them to the point of inflicting emotional distress," Morrison said. "I think the damages are likely attributable to the breach of contract. If they (the jury) had thought this was a significant nuisance, then we would not have seen a trivial verdict." Morrison said the jury was presented other related information during the trial and awarded Kerr less than one-third of the jurisdictional limit of small-claims court. "The jury heard that Mr. Kerr was growing some marijuana himself and smoking marijuana himself and actually contemplated putting a grow operation on his own home. He has unclean hands with this accusation," Morrison added. "There was an immediate next door neighbor to the Matthews' legal growing operation who testified that there were no offensive odors, which the jury also heard." With the claim against the Matthewses for using toxic chemicals on their medical marijuana, Kerr warned the public to be cautious when purchasing from local cannabis clubs. "When people buy their medical marijuana from local pot clubs, they should definitely be careful about what they're getting," Kerr said. "Who knows what kind of toxic chemicals have been applied and what adverse health effects they might have." https://www.ukiahdailyjournal.com/Sto...900692,00.html |
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
I would of never told that landlord in the first place. What a dick.
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
WOW!!
![]() EDIT Yea never tell..peace.. Sack's First Outdoor Grow Our grow has adopted some new family members.. LQQK!! sack
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Captain Expando
![]() Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: In The Light
Posts: 5,080
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
maybe put a neon sign up instead.... "I GROW BUD"
__________________
"Look, the people you are after are the people you depend on. We cook your meals, we haul your trash, we connect your calls, we drive your ambulances. We guard you while you sleep. Do not... fuck with us." |
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
moneyhighpower
Join Date: May 2005
Location: at home
Posts: 177
![]() |
lol
|
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz
Posts: 7,590
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
so...
if i fart a lot, my neighbor can sue me, too?? this is really stupid! only in california...
__________________
Sleepy Test Chemmy Jones Sleepy Tests Jolly Bud from Mountain High Seeds Killer Chem Freebie grow Sleepy Tests OJD...>>>Gangsta Haze |
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Couldn't they have grown something other than skunk?
I lived in California in the Mid 80's when for 5 years all you could get was skunk.... Got a bit burned out on it for a while. |
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Just a pissing contest between nieghbors gone bad. Only in California huh, other states could learn a little about compassion from Califorinia.How the hell does he know what they spray on thier plants. Thats why I live in country, fuck a bunch of zero lot living.
Mo, |
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
New Member
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 19
![]() |
im with ya on that mo
|
|
|
|
|
|
#10 | |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Quote:
With the freedom to grow comes the responsibility of seeing that your grow doesn't infringe on other's rights or on their quality of life. I love the smell of my garden but wouldn't want to have to smell it all day. You gotta come out for fresh air sometimes. These growers were irresponsible. Yeah, I know the guy gave them permission to grow, but he may not have had a hundred stinkers in mind when he did so. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|