What's new

MMJ Dispensaries-No Longer To Be Prosecuted

vta

Active member
Veteran
:yoinks:


Posted by CN Staff on March 19, 2009 at 05:07:08 PT
By Josh Meyer and Scott Glover
Source: Los Angeles Times

medical Los Angeles, CA -- Reporting from Los Angeles and Washington -- U.S. Atty. Gen. Eric H. Holder Jr. said Wednesday that the Justice Department has no plans to prosecute pot dispensaries that are operating legally under state laws in California and a dozen other states -- a development that medical marijuana advocates and civil libertarians hailed as a sweeping change in federal drug policy.

In recent months, Obama administration officials have indicated that they planned to take a hands-off approach to such clinics, but Holder's comments -- made at a wide-ranging briefing with reporters -- offered the most detailed explanation to date of the changing priorities toward the controversial prosecutions.

The Bush administration targeted medical marijuana distributors even in states that had passed laws allowing use of the drug for medical purposes by cancer patients, those dealing with chronic pain or other serious ailments. Holder said the priority of the new administration is to go after egregious offenders operating in violation of both federal and state law, such as those being used as fronts for drug dealers.

"Those are the organizations, the people, that we will target," the attorney general said.

Medical marijuana activists and civil libertarians embraced Holder's latest statement as the most forceful affirmation of what long had been anticipated: a landmark turnaround from the Bush administration's policy of zero tolerance for cannabis use by patients.

"Whatever questions were left, today's comments clearly represent a change in policy out of Washington. He's sending a clear message to the DEA," said Ethan Nadelmann, executive director of the Drug Policy Alliance.

Cultivating, using and selling medical marijuana are allowed in some instances under California law. But such actions are outlawed entirely under federal law, which supersedes those of the states. A dozen other states have laws similar to California's, according to the Marijuana Policy Project, an organization that supports the legalization of the drug.

In the 13 years since California voters made the state one of the first to legalize medical marijuana, federal officials have won all the major legal battles, including one at the U.S. Supreme Court in 2001 in which their right to prosecute marijuana sellers was upheld. But supporters of medical marijuana have fought back on the political front, and Holder's announcement is their biggest victory so far.

Thom Mrozek, a spokesman for Thomas P. O'Brien, the U.S. attorney in Los Angeles, said the office already focused on egregious offenders such as those who sell drugs to minors and people with bogus prescriptions or those who operate away from their approved location.

"In every single case we have prosecuted, the defendants violated state as well as federal law," Mrozek said.

Despite the abundance of medical marijuana dispensaries in Southern California, Mrozek said prosecutors have charged only four operators and their associates in the last seven years.

Obama suggested during the presidential campaign that medical marijuana dispensaries operating within state law would not be subject to prosecution if he were elected.

But soon after his inauguration, the Drug Enforcement Administration raided several dispensaries in the Los Angeles area and near Tahoe, in what appeared to be a continuation of policies enforced under previous administrations. At Wednesday's briefing, his first major sit-down with reporters, Holder was asked if the Justice Department planned to raid any more clinics.

"The policy is to go after those people who violate both federal and state law, to the extent that people do that and try to use medical marijuana laws as a shield for activity that is not designed to comport with what the intention was of the state law," Holder said. "Those are the organizations, the people, that we will target. And that is consistent with what the president said during the campaign."

A Justice Department official confirmed that Holder's comments effectively articulated a formal Obama administration policy of not going after such clinics.

"Before, he didn't really lay out the policy. Today, he stated the policy," said the Justice Department official, who spoke on the condition of anonymity because he was not authorized to discuss the matter publicly.

"If you are operating a medical marijuana clinic that is actually a front, we'll come after you," the official said. "But if you are operating within the law, we are not going to prioritize our resources to go after them."

Bruce Mirken of the Marijuana Policy Project said he still has some concerns: What happens to dispensary operators caught up in raids during the last days of the Bush policy, and would federal drug agents resist "trumping up" violations to circumvent the Obama administration's edict.

"The devil is going to be in the details of implementation," Mirken said. "I think you have to assume that there are people within the DEA and some in local law enforcement who still don't like medical marijuana and would like to find an excuse to continue making arrests of law-abiding dispensary operators."

Times staff writer Eric Bailey contributed to this report.

Note: The statement by Eric H. Holder Jr. represents a landmark shift from the Bush administration's zero tolerance toward the use of pot by people with cancer and other serious ailments.
 

vta

Active member
Veteran
Obama To Stop Raids on Marijuana Dispensers

By David Johnston and Neil A. Lewis
Source: New York Times

medical Washington, D.C. -- Attorney General Eric H. Holder Jr. on Wednesday outlined a shift in the enforcement of federal drug laws, saying the administration would effectively end the Bush administration’s frequent raids on distributors of medical marijuana.

Speaking with reporters, Mr. Holder provided few specifics but said the Justice Department’s enforcement policy would now be restricted to traffickers who falsely masqueraded as medical dispensaries and “use medical marijuana laws as a shield.”

In the Bush administration, federal agents raided medical marijuana distributors that violated federal statutes even if the dispensaries appeared to be complying with state laws. The raids produced a flood of complaints, particularly in California, which in 1996 became the first state to legalize marijuana sales to people with doctors’ prescriptions.

Graham Boyd, the director of the American Civil Liberties Union drug law project, said Mr. Holder’s remarks created a reasonable balance between conflicting state and federal laws and “seem to finally end the policy war over medical marijuana.” He said officials in California and the 12 other states that have authorized the use of medical marijuana had hesitated to adopt regulations to carry out their laws because of uncertainty created by the Bush administration.

Mr. Holder said the new approach was consistent with statements made by President Obama in the campaign and was based on an assessment of how to allocate scarce enforcement resources. He said dispensaries operating in accord with California law would not be a priority for the administration.

Mr. Holder’s comments appeared to be an effort to clarify the policy after some news reports last month interpreted his answer to a reporter’s question to be a flat assertion that all raids on marijuana growers would cease. Department officials said Mr. Holder had not intended to assert any policy change last month but was decidedly doing so on Wednesday.

Ethan Nadelmann, the founder of the Drug Policy Alliance, said Mr. Holder was telling the Drug Enforcement Administration that it should leave legitimate growers of medical marijuana untouched. “The message from the Bush Justice Department was ‘watch out — we have the authority to go after everybody,’ ” he said.

On other matters, in his first wide-ranging conversation with reporters as attorney general, Mr. Holder said the Justice Department was still reviewing the case files of detainees held at Guantánamo Bay, Cuba, to determine whether they could be released or would be tried in a civilian criminal court or some other legal forum. He said it was possible that some detainees like the Uighurs held in Cuba could be released into the United States.

He also said the department was “monitoring” developments related to accusations of abuse of detainees by the Central Intelligence Agency, but stopped short of endorsing the appointment of a special prosecutor. “We will let the law and facts take us to wherever we need to go,” he said.

Mr. Holder said the department should be open to preserving a healthy newspaper industry. He said he would consider adjusting enforcement of antitrust statutes if that would help news organizations develop collective distribution systems.

A version of this article appeared in print on March 19, 2009, on page A18 of the New York edition.
 
That is great news for MJ dispensaries. Unfortunately I do not think that it will help any of those that were previously raided.
 

vta

Active member
Veteran
That is great news for MJ dispensaries. Unfortunately I do not think that it will help any of those that were previously raided.

Who knows...it just might.

I do know that this is the best news for mmj in a long, long time. The fed law needs to change and people will still go to jail for pot...but this is the 1st step. I also expect this new administration to reschedule mj and also allow Dr. Cracker to grow and test.
 
T

theBluntedOne

Thanks vta...this is grea news. I was skeptical, but with this much talk from them, it seems it might reall y be the end...at least fro the next 4 years. Great new and great post!
 

Thundurkel

Just Call me Urkle!!
Veteran
Yea this is all over the news this morning finally instead of just hearing it on hear I see and hear it on tv that the Feds cannot raid Medical Marijuana Dispensaries anymore!!!
 
D

dongle69

The feds can still raid the dispensaries.

"...enforcement policy would now be restricted to traffickers who falsely masqueraded as medical dispensaries and “use medical marijuana laws as a shield.”

"Cultivating, using and selling medical marijuana are allowed in some instances under California law. But such actions are outlawed entirely under federal law, which supersedes those of the states."

"the new administration is to go after egregious offenders operating in violation of both federal and state law"


Most dispensaries I have seen in California could easily fall under the above.
 
It's baby steps. I mean it's only a policy change; the laws are still the same and the SWAT team-looking, money-grubbing DEA buttmunches are still the same but it's a step in the right direction.

we need some more cannabistaxact.org stuff going on!
 
M

movingtocally

Great stuff overall, but...

Great stuff overall, but...

"Thom Mrozek, a spokesman for Thomas P. O'Brien, the U.S. attorney in Los Angeles, said the office already focused on egregious offenders such as those who sell drugs to minors and people with bogus prescriptions or those who operate away from their approved location."

I wonder what he means by "bogus prescriptions?" Does he mean fake prescriptions from unlicensed physicians that some dummy wrote out for himself, or does he mean to imply that those not suffering from extremely serious medical conditions shouldn't be getting licenses?
 
D

dongle69

That is just it.
Keep it vague and they can bust anyone they want to.
Especially in places where local law enforcement are "miffed."
 
M

movingtocally

Like the DPP guy said, my concern is if some mid level, miserable, semi literate DEA pig decides to take it upon himself to trump up charges.


Say some of you are operating under the prop 420 guidelines as recommended by the CA AG. Or perhaps you're not, but you're 2 grams over the prop 215 state limit. You're operating outside state and federal law.


They still have leverage to pull that shit. Is Obama willing to exercise political capital to say "knock it the fuck off or else" if the DEA were to do that? I highly doubt it.

Shit, there are still some local San Diego pigs who still haven't gotten the message that the charade is up and it's time to do real police work. You think some fat slob who's spent a career manufactoring hate for happy "potheads" in order to justify his profession is going to stop on a dime?
 
E

easyrasta

This is a power moment in History.
Save some money and doing the right thing.
very ballsy of him.
Right on
Peace
Ez
 
B

Blue Dot

So it's gonna be legal for San Diego to have dispensaries right?

I mean when they shut them all down here it was under the threat that they were operating against fed law and the feds would be called in.

So can we finally tell Bonnie Dumbass to stick it. :)
 

Thundurkel

Just Call me Urkle!!
Veteran
what I don't like is they are still going to raid spots if they feel it's a "Front" I mean what your club HAS to have ONLY cancer patients?? My rec is for depression, anxiety, and pain in my knee and right hand that didn't heal properly. But will that make me fall under a phony rec ? I know they would rather me be stuck on the opiate plan they set out for everyone to fail on so you can end up in a methadone clinic that you have to be drug tested each month so they make even more money cuz they own stock in all of it BUT cannabis....
 

foo_bird

Member
it's better then it was what we need is a doctor as drug czar
real research at lest reclassify MJ I mean "no medical value"
 
M

movingtocally

So can we finally tell Bonnie Dumbass to stick it. :)
And he'll promptly laugh at you and order you to assume the position, throw you in the back of the wagon, throw you in holding overnight while discussing with the prosecutor, who will determine whether or not he feels like filing federal charges.

How much do your plants way when soil, stems, and wet bud weight are included? I'm guessing more than prop 215 allows for. Thus, he will call you a serious drug dealer facing federal "pound me in the ass" prison.


This press release means absolutely nothing for growers who can't afford to spend 60 an eighth at the shop. You're at the mercy of the individual cumguzzling leo's who bust you.

Classic class warfare.
 
Top