Yep, most of the crazy disagreements between smart people, are not about the actual "answer" or results, rather endless amount of time is spent debating the "process" (how to get there), aka "variables".
Let me go out on a limb here....I submit that most ALL ICMag members agree that quality cannabis is good for the body and soul (the "answer").
However when it comes to the "process", I submit there are excellent hydro growers who have invested years perfecting their synthetic craft...who will not be easily convinced that organic soil/soil-less is best (their head must accept and admit they have been doing it "right", but going about it the "wrong" way). Ditto for the organic soil/soil-less grower to be persuaded that synthetic nutrients are the "best". Both camps are solidily entrenched since both are "correct" and neither are "wrong".
Imagine that, a situation where two super intelligent experts disagree on the "process" (hydro vs soil/soil-less) but agree on the "answer" (clean smoking cannabis that is free of unwanted chemicals and contaminants that is good for the body and soul) .
Let me go out on a limb here....I submit that most ALL ICMag members agree that quality cannabis is good for the body and soul (the "answer").
However when it comes to the "process", I submit there are excellent hydro growers who have invested years perfecting their synthetic craft...who will not be easily convinced that organic soil/soil-less is best (their head must accept and admit they have been doing it "right", but going about it the "wrong" way). Ditto for the organic soil/soil-less grower to be persuaded that synthetic nutrients are the "best". Both camps are solidily entrenched since both are "correct" and neither are "wrong".
Imagine that, a situation where two super intelligent experts disagree on the "process" (hydro vs soil/soil-less) but agree on the "answer" (clean smoking cannabis that is free of unwanted chemicals and contaminants that is good for the body and soul) .