Correct.
Correct.
Anyone have the skinny on what type of lighting, media and grow style Thin Mint was bred under? This environment is where it will produce what it was initially passed around for. Main reason so many "Oh this cut is awesome," have turned out less than stellar when shared.
Apparently I was not clear in what I meant. I've spent over 15 years on the forums and there's a definite difference in output based on growing conditions. If there weren't, everyone entering a competition with the same cut would have the same score, same terp profile, same cannabinoid ratios and on and on. This is *definitely* not the case.
Apparently I was not clear in what I meant. I've spent over 15 years on the forums and there's a definite difference in output based on growing conditions. If there weren't, everyone entering a competition with the same cut would have the same score, same terp profile, same cannabinoid ratios and on and on. This is *definitely* not the case.
A breeding project done under led's with organics is going to perform differently under the sun, or HPS or MH and with refined mineral nutriens or a different NPK profile. The same goes for the temp and RH and amendment regimen.
No offense but, huge photos aside, your specific example holds zero weight for anything but those specific genetics.
Apparently I lack the skills to explain to you what I mean. No worries, have a great day anyway.
