What's new
  • Happy Birthday ICMag! Been 20 years since Gypsy Nirvana created the forum! We are celebrating with a 4/20 Giveaway and by launching a new Patreon tier called "420club". You can read more here.
  • Important notice: ICMag's T.O.U. has been updated. Please review it here. For your convenience, it is also available in the main forum menu, under 'Quick Links"!

Trump implies that he might legalize cannabis.

Easy7

Active member
Veteran
If Trump legalized cannabis, he'd lose the majority of the people who voted for him. Conservatives in general are strongly opposed to cannabis and/or drugs. It's not part of their heritage and they are all about old ways, right or wrong.
 
No, ts not false till proven to be. Until then its alleged or claimed.
Its still being investigated, be patient




Your logic is hobbled, your beliefs misplaced.



"alleged or claimed" like: my inauguration crowds were the largest, my tax returns will be released when audit is complete, Mexico will pay for the wall, good people on both sides? Son, these are known falsehoods. They are proven and documented as lies.



Are your signature incoherent babbling and flaccid barbs a symptom of HRC's mocking laughter resounding in the swampy caverns of your skull?
 

Slim Pickens

Well-known member
Veteran
If Trump legalized cannabis, he'd lose the majority of the people who voted for him. Conservatives in general are strongly opposed to cannabis and/or drugs. It's not part of their heritage and they are all about old ways, right or wrong.

I respectfully disagree.It sure seems to me that his supporters follow him without question.
 

Spaventa

...
Veteran
Your logic is hobbled, your beliefs misplaced.



"alleged or claimed" like: my inauguration crowds were the largest, my tax returns will be released when audit is complete, Mexico will pay for the wall, good people on both sides? Son, these are known falsehoods. They are proven and documented as lies.



Are your signature incoherent babbling and flaccid barbs a symptom of HRC's mocking laughter resounding in the swampy caverns of your skull?

More proof you can't be bothered to read because all I have asked in my posts is why he is still president/alive/free, given the weight of proof against him and the number of his offences. I have yet to hear any proper explanation. The more you tell me he's guilty of and more proof you tell me about, the more you highlight the question Im asking, validating me asking it, you moron.

HRC's mocking laughter? right... hey what IS that huge square object protruding from back under her clothing?
 

Spaventa

...
Veteran
What is that?
1213-hillary-clinton-back-brace-940x400.jpg
 
I respectfully disagree.It sure seems to me that his supporters follow him without question.
Ya, his most fervent followers are on lock. The bible thumpers venerate him. He leads them in prayer after discussing paying off his porn star mistress.


But his followers arent an homogenized clot. I think some would feel betrayed, some might lose resources (LEO), some are just darn hypocrite party poopers.



Still. it looks to me like MJ legislation could easily be packaged into a legacy move for a guy who is a deal maker. It's no secret that the population approves MJ whereas net neutrality, 1% tax relief law and kill obamacare, all unpopular yet championed by dotard.
 

Stoner4Life

Medicinal Advocate
ICMag Donor
Veteran



gosh, I was gonna ask you guys to stop the name calling & member bashing but figured, wtf! who am I ask??? After all, its forever been Gypsy's wish here, and he's asked & moderated this thread (&other political nightmare threads) numerous times.

So every time (the left & right being guilty atm) you all start in, you're shitting on Gypsy's good work & wishes, his wishes being to have you all treat EACH OTHER reasonably, while you obviously pick apart (me too) the 'other side'.

It's not the hillary bashing, it's not the trump trashing, that's gonna happen; it's just that neither side is going to win the other over, the camps are and have been divided, and completely polarized; there's miles n' miles of middle ground and no one is willing to step foot in it, not the politicians and certainly not the two crews here.

that being said, I'm still a fun kinda guy and so I brought along some gas for the fire, just lemme know when y'all think that it's time to light things up....... :hotbounce:hotbounce:hotbounce


 
Last edited:

Stoner4Life

Medicinal Advocate
ICMag Donor
Veteran
Sure, I can tell, your cooler than the other side of pillow. Nothing gets to you.

Anyway, WHAT is that? a GPS monitor maybe?

View Image

maybe it's her power pack, charges slide off of her like greased goose shit goes through a tin horn, you can't prosecute bots/droids yet, those laws aren't on the books.

Area 51 stuff.
 

Spaventa

...
Veteran
Ya, his most fervent followers are on lock. The bible thumpers venerate him. He leads them in prayer after discussing paying off his porn star mistress.


But his followers arent an homogenized clot. I think some would feel betrayed, some might lose resources (LEO), some are just darn hypocrite party poopers.



Still. it looks to me like MJ legislation could easily be packaged into a legacy move for a guy who is a deal maker. It's no secret that the population approves MJ whereas net neutrality, 1% tax relief law and kill obamacare, all unpopular yet championed by dotard.

You idiot, even his detractors admit he's achieved more than any incoming president in history. Consumer confidence, stock market, his part in the korean peace agreement, etc etc etc. He doesn't have to do a damn thing at this point. Your mind is mush.
 
M

moose eater

More proof you can't be bothered to read because all I have asked in my posts is why he is still president/alive/free, given the weight of proof against him and the number of his offences. I have yet to hear any proper explanation. The more you tell me he's guilty of and more proof you tell me about, the more you highlight the question Im asking, validating me asking it, you moron.

HRC's mocking laughter? right... hey what IS that huge square object protruding from back under her clothing?

I gave you a thorough explanation of the law's limitations where some things are concerned, Spaventa. Never received acknowledgement or a reply.

And it was based in what I know from both national level observations, and from up close & personal observations from when a number of our legislators and others in Alaska (at the State level) were prosecuted for bribery and other infractions.

I'll spare you the litany of proof that exists re. HRC's dishonesty re. her claims to not have had anything to do with running the Clinton Foundation when she was Sec of State, and the contributions from 17 foreign nations that received weapons contracts. By the way, the donations and contracts were news in Time Magazine several years before she ran for Prez.

Trump's legal issues, or current lack of them, were mostly outlined in the first explanation that was over-looked or ignored.
 

Spaventa

...
Veteran
I gave you a thorough explanation of the law's limitations where some things are concerned, Spaventa. Never received acknowledgement or a reply.

And it was based in what I know from both national level observations, and from up close & personal observations from when a number of our legislators and others in Alaska (at the State level) were prosecuted for bribery and other infractions.

I'll spare you the litany of proof that exists re. HRC's dishonesty re. her claims to not have had anything to do with running the Clinton Foundation when she was Sec of State, and the contributions from 17 foreign nations that received weapons contracts. By the way, the donations and contracts were news in Time Magazine several years before she ran for Prez.

Trump's legal issues, or current lack of them, were mostly outlined in the first explanation that was over-looked or ignored.

No I saw it I just lost trac of replying to so many people. This was the salient point for me -

Because in quid pro quo bribery and those sorts of crimes, whether HRC or The Donald, or whom ever, circumstantial evidence isn't sufficient.

People like monkey claim theres PROOF of NUMEROUS wrong doings, moral and legal so your attempt to explain his apparent invulnerability though respectable, isn't good enough. He's the president. Bill got impeached for sexual harassment so it can and has been done, when its based in truth and fact.
Ive lost count of the stooges Hillary has paid to make shit up about Trump - if ANY had one hundredth of the veracity of Bills harassment, he'd be gone.
 
M

moose eater

The part that pertains to Trump involves the majority of his reprehensible acts having been committed BEFORE he was elected Prez. Impeaching folks for what they did BEFORE they entered the Oval Office is a very slim probability.

However, if actual collusion is proven, then it's a fairly clear violation of the restrictions laid out in the Citizens United case and the resulting free-for-all on 3rd party attack ads.

There's a number of specific and pertinent points in that post.
 
M

moose eater

Trump may also come to be held accountable for the pay-off to what's-her-name, Stormy, in the event that it's proven that the expenditure was specifically related to greasing the campaign tracks.

What we think we know, and FACTS, are different critters altogether in a court room. No matter how clear things appear to be.

And bear in mind that while a lot of what was posted on social media by any number of keyboard guerillas from where ever was pure BS, even the feds have authenticated the shit leaked from the DNC. The Wiki-files were legit. And Hillary, the DNC, Trump, and the RNC, are predominantly scumbags. Like one thief complaining about the karmic nature of another thief's habits.

The bastages deserve each other.
 

Spaventa

...
Veteran
However, if actual collusion is proven,

It will be, only not by Trump. The big news about to break stems from the Weiner laptop and it won't end well for Hillary and her circle.
When you learn the truth you won't be as shocked by Trumps predilections.
 

Brother Nature

Well-known member
Billy Cliton was a dodgy fucker, even while in office and he never got impeached. The system of power is setup to prop those who wield it up pretty well. Truth is Trump probably could shoot someone point blank in Times Square and get away with it.
 

Latest posts

Latest posts

Top