White Beard
Active member
Well done!
-
Happy Birthday ICMag! Been 20 years since Gypsy Nirvana created the forum! We are celebrating with a 4/20 Giveaway and by launching a new Patreon tier called "420club". You can read more here.
-
Important notice: ICMag's T.O.U. has been updated. Please review it here. For your convenience, it is also available in the main forum menu, under 'Quick Links"!
:::::::INFOWARS News Thread:::::::
- Thread starter pipeline
- Start date
- Status
Well done!
The border issue is just like what happened to europe where hundreds of thousands of migrants were let in by the globalists and caused lots of trouble,changing their communities forever.
BOMBSHELL NEWS _________________BOOM_________________
https://europe.infowars.com/danish-populists-propose-asylum-freeze-deportations/
Danish Populists Propose Asylum Freeze, Deportations
Dan Lyman May 24, 2019
Share this article
Like
Tweet
+1
Share
Pin it
E-mail
Print
The Danish People's Party (DF) has put forward a proposal that includes a five year freeze on accepting asylum seekers at the country's borders and provisions for deportations.
Denmark's most powerful right-wing faction hopes to implement a moratorium on accepting migrants who have traveled through Sweden or Germany that would last through 2025.
"If you, as a refugee or migrant, come to the German-Danish border from New Year and five years on, you will be rejected and asked to seek asylum in Germany instead. And the same at the border with Sweden," DR reports.
"And if you come to Denmark anyway, you will be placed in a departure center, while Denmark negotiates for cash payment, to send you back to a refugee camp in the area you come from."
The proposal comes as the Danish government works to convert temporary border controls with both Germany and Sweden into permanent, hard boundaries.
"We do not want you to seek asylum directly in Denmark in the coming years," says DF party chairman Kristian Thulesen Dahl. "This means that if you come to the Danish border from a peaceful country, typically Germany, then you are told that it is in Germany you have to seek."
"If you still come to Denmark and want to seek asylum, you go to an exit center and are told that we will help you back to your neighbourhood by simply paying us off. The result will be that you do not get asylum in Denmark, and that is the definition of an asylum freeze that we can then implement."
The plan's proponents say it would eliminate some 4,000 'asylum seekers' per year, saving taxpayers up to $300 million, the majority of which would be used to increase pension payments to Danish senior citizens.
"The question is, how many people will want to come to Denmark if they know that we have a system where we will send them back," said Thulesen Dahl. "And then I think there is a fairly great understanding in Germany for our proposal. I also think they are quite tired of people traveling through six to seven safe countries before seeking asylum."
Thanks for your response, white beard!
BOMBSHELL NEWS _________________BOOM_________________
https://europe.infowars.com/danish-populists-propose-asylum-freeze-deportations/
Danish Populists Propose Asylum Freeze, Deportations
Dan Lyman May 24, 2019
Share this article
Like
Tweet
+1
Share
Pin it
The Danish People's Party (DF) has put forward a proposal that includes a five year freeze on accepting asylum seekers at the country's borders and provisions for deportations.
Denmark's most powerful right-wing faction hopes to implement a moratorium on accepting migrants who have traveled through Sweden or Germany that would last through 2025.
"If you, as a refugee or migrant, come to the German-Danish border from New Year and five years on, you will be rejected and asked to seek asylum in Germany instead. And the same at the border with Sweden," DR reports.
"And if you come to Denmark anyway, you will be placed in a departure center, while Denmark negotiates for cash payment, to send you back to a refugee camp in the area you come from."
The proposal comes as the Danish government works to convert temporary border controls with both Germany and Sweden into permanent, hard boundaries.
"We do not want you to seek asylum directly in Denmark in the coming years," says DF party chairman Kristian Thulesen Dahl. "This means that if you come to the Danish border from a peaceful country, typically Germany, then you are told that it is in Germany you have to seek."
"If you still come to Denmark and want to seek asylum, you go to an exit center and are told that we will help you back to your neighbourhood by simply paying us off. The result will be that you do not get asylum in Denmark, and that is the definition of an asylum freeze that we can then implement."
The plan's proponents say it would eliminate some 4,000 'asylum seekers' per year, saving taxpayers up to $300 million, the majority of which would be used to increase pension payments to Danish senior citizens.
"The question is, how many people will want to come to Denmark if they know that we have a system where we will send them back," said Thulesen Dahl. "And then I think there is a fairly great understanding in Germany for our proposal. I also think they are quite tired of people traveling through six to seven safe countries before seeking asylum."
Thanks for your response, white beard!
https://www.infowars.com/john-cleese-london-is-not-an-english-city-anymore/
John Cleese: London is Not an English City Anymore
Monty Python star reiterates criticism of mass immigration
Paul Joseph Watson | Infowars.com - May 29, 2019
Monty Python icon John Cleese has stoked controversy by reiterating his belief that London is no longer an English city due to mass immigration.
In a tweet to his 5.6 million followers, Cleese said, “Some years ago I opined that London was not really an English city any more. Since then, virtually all my friends from abroad have confirmed my observation So there must be some truth in it.”
“I note also that London was the UK city that voted most strongly to remain in the EU,” he added.
Cleese first made similar statements back in 2011 when he opined that London was handed the Olympic Games because of mass immigration.
“I’m not sure what’s going on in Britain. Or, let me say this – I don’t know what’s going on in London, because London is no longer an English city,” said Cleese.
The actor said that London was the most cosmopolitan city on earth but that it “doesn’t feel English”.
“I had a Californian friend come over two months ago, walk down the King’s Road and say, “Where are all the English people?”
“I mean, I love having different cultures around. But when the parent culture kind of dissipates, you’re left thinking, “Well, what’s going on?”‘ said Cleese.
The Monty Python star’s comments are just a reflection of reality. In London, white British people are a minority and have been for some years.
Over 41% of London’s population is foreign born. London also has the second highest foreign-born population of any city in the world.
John Cleese: London is Not an English City Anymore
Monty Python star reiterates criticism of mass immigration
Paul Joseph Watson | Infowars.com - May 29, 2019
Monty Python icon John Cleese has stoked controversy by reiterating his belief that London is no longer an English city due to mass immigration.
In a tweet to his 5.6 million followers, Cleese said, “Some years ago I opined that London was not really an English city any more. Since then, virtually all my friends from abroad have confirmed my observation So there must be some truth in it.”
“I note also that London was the UK city that voted most strongly to remain in the EU,” he added.
Cleese first made similar statements back in 2011 when he opined that London was handed the Olympic Games because of mass immigration.
“I’m not sure what’s going on in Britain. Or, let me say this – I don’t know what’s going on in London, because London is no longer an English city,” said Cleese.
The actor said that London was the most cosmopolitan city on earth but that it “doesn’t feel English”.
“I had a Californian friend come over two months ago, walk down the King’s Road and say, “Where are all the English people?”
“I mean, I love having different cultures around. But when the parent culture kind of dissipates, you’re left thinking, “Well, what’s going on?”‘ said Cleese.
The Monty Python star’s comments are just a reflection of reality. In London, white British people are a minority and have been for some years.
Over 41% of London’s population is foreign born. London also has the second highest foreign-born population of any city in the world.
Bombshell News___________________Boom__________________
https://europe.infowars.com/poll-europeans-strongly-oppose-mass-migration-eus-handling-of-crisis/
Poll: Europeans Strongly Oppose Mass Migration, EU's Handling of Crisis
Dan Lyman May 22, 2019
Share this article
Like
Tweet
+1
Share
Pin it
E-mail
Print
Europeans strongly oppose mass migration to the continent and the EU's handling of the on-going crisis, according to a new survey with an enormous sample size.
Over 35,000 Europeans from 35 countries polled by the Szazadveg Institute responded to questions about the threat of mass migration to prosperity, safety, and Christian culture, as well as their thoughts on the different approaches taken to the issues by formerly socialist Eastern nations and those in Western Europe.
Key findings of the poll include:
"Europe continues to face key changes today, and its geopolitical and strategic position has changed significantly,” the Szazadveg Institute explains in the report's introduction.
“Just as in the previous years, the Szazadveg Foundation conducted this uniquely comprehensive survey in Q1 2019, focusing on the key topics that influence the European political and social discourse, such as the migration crisis, the connection between illegal immigration the terror threat, the performance of the EU in various aspects, the effects of globalization, the relation to the Christian culture.”
https://europe.infowars.com/poll-europeans-strongly-oppose-mass-migration-eus-handling-of-crisis/
Poll: Europeans Strongly Oppose Mass Migration, EU's Handling of Crisis
Dan Lyman May 22, 2019
Share this article
Like
Tweet
+1
Share
Pin it
Europeans strongly oppose mass migration to the continent and the EU's handling of the on-going crisis, according to a new survey with an enormous sample size.
Over 35,000 Europeans from 35 countries polled by the Szazadveg Institute responded to questions about the threat of mass migration to prosperity, safety, and Christian culture, as well as their thoughts on the different approaches taken to the issues by formerly socialist Eastern nations and those in Western Europe.
Key findings of the poll include:
- 76% of respondents say illegal migration to their countries is a serious problem, with Bulgarians feeling the most strongly about the issue at 89%.
- 68% fear "African immigrants will arrive at Europe en masse in the next decade."
- 55% believe most immigrants come to the EU for economic benefits and welfare, an increase from 47% in 2016.
- 61% say a mass influx of non-European migrants will be a setback for the economy.
- 63% say an influx of non-European migrants would increase the likelihood of cultural conflicts, while only 26% believe it provides a multicultural boost.
- 50% say East-Central European governments have handled the migration crisis best, with Hungary receiving highest marks at 70%. Only 24% support the EU's management of the crisis.
- Residents of Eastern European and low-migration countries overwhelmingly oppose the EU's 'refugee distribution' quotas.
- 58% say Europe should preserve its Christian culture, while only 31% would prefer the culture move in a secular direction.
"Europe continues to face key changes today, and its geopolitical and strategic position has changed significantly,” the Szazadveg Institute explains in the report's introduction.
“Just as in the previous years, the Szazadveg Foundation conducted this uniquely comprehensive survey in Q1 2019, focusing on the key topics that influence the European political and social discourse, such as the migration crisis, the connection between illegal immigration the terror threat, the performance of the EU in various aspects, the effects of globalization, the relation to the Christian culture.”
Replacement migration is what some call it - and the common people of Europe were not asked if they would like unfettered immigration of millions of people from radically different mainly 3rd world cultures into their nations, many of whom refuse to assimilate, or even learn the local language - most Europeans are still not aware of The Kalergi Plan, which I made a thread about some time ago - naturally it is kept out of the MSM.
https://www.icmag.com/ic/showthread.php?t=348315&highlight=KALERGI+pLAN
https://www.icmag.com/ic/showthread.php?t=348315&highlight=KALERGI+pLAN
W
Water-
you may want to do some more research in to the Szazadveg Foundation and their contracts with certain Hungarian political and governmnet factions.
.... wait, you posted this exact same thing in the 'Majority Of Commercially Available CBD Products "Contaminated" With Heavy Metals' thread.
This isn't an infowars news thread, it's an advertisement and yer taking advantage of Gypsy and ICMag.
This isn't an infowars news thread, it's an advertisement and yer taking advantage of Gypsy and ICMag.
Fun fact: This 'great replacement' bullshit has been the driving force behind almost every mass shooting in the last year. If you believe it, you're a mass shooter in the making.
It is the basis for all white nationalism, which should make it no surprise that it's one of the main conspiracies that racist outlets like Infowars promote.
[YOUTUBEIF]Nc1QJVeDZYQ[/YOUTUBEIF]
It is the basis for all white nationalism, which should make it no surprise that it's one of the main conspiracies that racist outlets like Infowars promote.
[YOUTUBEIF]Nc1QJVeDZYQ[/YOUTUBEIF]
The White-Extinction Conspiracy Theory Is Bonkers
The New Zealand attacker wanted you to think white people face existential decline. They don’t.
https://www.nytimes.com/2019/03/20/opinion/new-zealand-great-replacement.html
The New Zealand attacker wanted you to think white people face existential decline. They don’t.
https://www.nytimes.com/2019/03/20/opinion/new-zealand-great-replacement.html
How to defeat the cretinous ‘great replacement’ theory at the heart of the Christchurch mosque attack
https://www.independent.co.uk/voice...enton-tarrant-great-replacement-a8827966.html
https://www.independent.co.uk/voice...enton-tarrant-great-replacement-a8827966.html
https://www.infowars.com/democrats-...nt-after-mueller-says-no-collusion-in-speech/
Democrats Demand Trump Impeachment After Mueller Says No Collusion in Speech
Democrats planned to impeach president regardless of Special Counsel findings
Jamie White | Infowars.com - May 29, 2019
Image Credits: Chip Somodevilla/Getty Images.
Congressional Democrats are determined to impeach President Trump despite Special Counsel Mueller’s rare public statement reaffirming no collusion with the Russian government.
All the usual suspects who have been calling for Trump’s impeachment since his swearing-in, including Rep. Maxine Waters (Calif.) and even many 2020 presidential candidates, have doubled down, citing Mueller’s remark that only Congress could indict a sitting president.
https://www.infowars.com/tucker-carlson-calls-mueller-sleazy-and-dishonest/
Tucker Carlson Calls Mueller ‘Sleazy And Dishonest’
Carlson wondered why Mueller made his statement when he has “nothing else to say.”
Daily Caller - May 30, 2019
Tucker Carlson said former special counsel Robert Mueller falls into the category of people “you sort of admire from afar” but the “more you learn it turns out that they are sleazy and dishonest.”
The Fox News host’s commentary came during a conversation with former DOJ spokesman Ian Prior about Mueller’s Wednesday morning statement.
WATCH:
https://www.infowars.com/dershowitz-mueller-has-revealed-his-partisan-bias-in-favor-of-democrats/
Dershowitz: ‘Mueller Has Revealed His Partisan Bias’ In Favor of Democrats
‘Gave political gift to Democrats in Congress seeking to institute impeachment proceedings against President Trump,’ he says
Infowars.com - May 29, 2019
Constitutional lawyer Alan Dershowitz penned a blistering op-ed criticizing Special Counsel Robert Mueller’s statement implying that President Trump may have committed a crime despite not bringing forward any charges against him.
In an op-ed for The Hill entitled, “Shame On Robert Mueller For Exceeding His Role,” Dershowitz stated that Mueller’s public statement on Wednesday was more irresponsible than fired FBI Director James Comey’s exoneration of Hillary Clinton.
“The statement by special counsel Robert Mueller in a Wednesday press conference that ‘if we had confidence that the president clearly did not commit a crime we would have said that’ is worse than the statement made by then FBI Director James Comey regarding Hillary Clinton during the 2016 presidential campaign,” Dershowitz wrote Wednesday.
“Comey said in a 2016 press conference, ‘Although we did not find clear evidence that Secretary Clinton or her colleagues intended to violate laws governing the handling of classified information, there is evidence that they were extremely careless in their handling of very sensitive highly classified information.'”
“Comey was universally criticized for going beyond his responsibility to state whether there was sufficient evidence to indict Clinton. Mueller, however, did even more. He went beyond the conclusion of his report and gave a political gift to Democrats in Congress who are seeking to institute impeachment proceedings against President Trump,” he continued.
“By implying that President Trump may have committed obstruction of justice, Mueller effectively invited Democrats to institute impeachment proceedings. Obstruction of justice is a “high crime and misdemeanor” which, under the Constitution, authorizes impeachment and removal of the president.”
Dershowitz, himself a Democrat, then threw Mueller’s professional integrity in doubt, saying Mueller demonstrated his favoritism for the Democrats after he handed them a “political gift” of muddying the waters on obstruction of justice, which the Department of Justice determined did not take place.
“Until today, I have defended Mueller against accusations that he is a partisan. I did not believe that he personally favored either the Democrats or the Republicans, or had a point of view on whether President Trump should be impeached. I have now changed my mind,” he wrote.
“By putting his thumb, indeed his elbow, on the scale of justice in favor of impeachment based on obstruction of justice, Mueller has revealed his partisan bias. He also has distorted the role of a prosecutor in our justice system.”
The constitutional scholar added that Mueller’s only logical purpose of going beyond his report was to smear Trump to help the Democrats with impeachment proceedings, which they immediately called for following Mueller’s public statement.
“No prosecutor should ever say or do anything for the purpose of helping one party or the other. I cannot imagine a plausible reason why Mueller went beyond his report and gratuitously suggested that President Trump might be guilty, except to help the Democrats and to encourage impeachment talk and action. Shame on Mueller for abusing his position of trust and for allowing himself to be used for partisan advantage.”
Democrats Demand Trump Impeachment After Mueller Says No Collusion in Speech
Democrats planned to impeach president regardless of Special Counsel findings
Jamie White | Infowars.com - May 29, 2019
Image Credits: Chip Somodevilla/Getty Images.Congressional Democrats are determined to impeach President Trump despite Special Counsel Mueller’s rare public statement reaffirming no collusion with the Russian government.
All the usual suspects who have been calling for Trump’s impeachment since his swearing-in, including Rep. Maxine Waters (Calif.) and even many 2020 presidential candidates, have doubled down, citing Mueller’s remark that only Congress could indict a sitting president.
https://www.infowars.com/tucker-carlson-calls-mueller-sleazy-and-dishonest/
Tucker Carlson Calls Mueller ‘Sleazy And Dishonest’
Carlson wondered why Mueller made his statement when he has “nothing else to say.”
Daily Caller - May 30, 2019
Tucker Carlson said former special counsel Robert Mueller falls into the category of people “you sort of admire from afar” but the “more you learn it turns out that they are sleazy and dishonest.”
The Fox News host’s commentary came during a conversation with former DOJ spokesman Ian Prior about Mueller’s Wednesday morning statement.
WATCH:
https://www.infowars.com/dershowitz-mueller-has-revealed-his-partisan-bias-in-favor-of-democrats/
Dershowitz: ‘Mueller Has Revealed His Partisan Bias’ In Favor of Democrats
‘Gave political gift to Democrats in Congress seeking to institute impeachment proceedings against President Trump,’ he says
Infowars.com - May 29, 2019
Constitutional lawyer Alan Dershowitz penned a blistering op-ed criticizing Special Counsel Robert Mueller’s statement implying that President Trump may have committed a crime despite not bringing forward any charges against him.
In an op-ed for The Hill entitled, “Shame On Robert Mueller For Exceeding His Role,” Dershowitz stated that Mueller’s public statement on Wednesday was more irresponsible than fired FBI Director James Comey’s exoneration of Hillary Clinton.
“The statement by special counsel Robert Mueller in a Wednesday press conference that ‘if we had confidence that the president clearly did not commit a crime we would have said that’ is worse than the statement made by then FBI Director James Comey regarding Hillary Clinton during the 2016 presidential campaign,” Dershowitz wrote Wednesday.
“Comey said in a 2016 press conference, ‘Although we did not find clear evidence that Secretary Clinton or her colleagues intended to violate laws governing the handling of classified information, there is evidence that they were extremely careless in their handling of very sensitive highly classified information.'”
“Comey was universally criticized for going beyond his responsibility to state whether there was sufficient evidence to indict Clinton. Mueller, however, did even more. He went beyond the conclusion of his report and gave a political gift to Democrats in Congress who are seeking to institute impeachment proceedings against President Trump,” he continued.
“By implying that President Trump may have committed obstruction of justice, Mueller effectively invited Democrats to institute impeachment proceedings. Obstruction of justice is a “high crime and misdemeanor” which, under the Constitution, authorizes impeachment and removal of the president.”
Dershowitz, himself a Democrat, then threw Mueller’s professional integrity in doubt, saying Mueller demonstrated his favoritism for the Democrats after he handed them a “political gift” of muddying the waters on obstruction of justice, which the Department of Justice determined did not take place.
“Until today, I have defended Mueller against accusations that he is a partisan. I did not believe that he personally favored either the Democrats or the Republicans, or had a point of view on whether President Trump should be impeached. I have now changed my mind,” he wrote.
“By putting his thumb, indeed his elbow, on the scale of justice in favor of impeachment based on obstruction of justice, Mueller has revealed his partisan bias. He also has distorted the role of a prosecutor in our justice system.”
The constitutional scholar added that Mueller’s only logical purpose of going beyond his report was to smear Trump to help the Democrats with impeachment proceedings, which they immediately called for following Mueller’s public statement.
“No prosecutor should ever say or do anything for the purpose of helping one party or the other. I cannot imagine a plausible reason why Mueller went beyond his report and gratuitously suggested that President Trump might be guilty, except to help the Democrats and to encourage impeachment talk and action. Shame on Mueller for abusing his position of trust and for allowing himself to be used for partisan advantage.”
TychoMonolyth
Boreal Curing
If god asked you? You'd bend to his corruption.
Here's the team he directed.
(courtesy of 'Boogieman')
Lets ignore obstruction while we're at it.
Here's the team he directed.
(courtesy of 'Boogieman')
Lets ignore obstruction while we're at it.
Ehh - excuse me - so you are saying beta that I am a mass shooter in the making?
I think not - since I can't see the point of shooting anyone that isn't shooting at me...
You do come out with the most asinine rash statements at times old chap -
I think not - since I can't see the point of shooting anyone that isn't shooting at me...
You do come out with the most asinine rash statements at times old chap -
beta said:
https://www.infowars.com/california-plan-to-stop-banks-from-killing-legal-pot-guns-speech/
California Plan to Stop Banks From Killing Legal Pot, Guns & Speech
National issue could be fixed with solution from an unlikely place
David Knight | Infowars.com - May 30, 2019
When the federal government wants to ignore the Constitution they have a secret partner — the Federal Reserve.
The banking system has been used to demonetize independent press, gun manufacturers, retailers and the legal marijuana industry.
Now, California has a solution we should ALL look at.
California Plan to Stop Banks From Killing Legal Pot, Guns & Speech
National issue could be fixed with solution from an unlikely place
David Knight | Infowars.com - May 30, 2019
When the federal government wants to ignore the Constitution they have a secret partner — the Federal Reserve.
The banking system has been used to demonetize independent press, gun manufacturers, retailers and the legal marijuana industry.
Now, California has a solution we should ALL look at.
CaptainDankness
Well-known member
I don't know about all that, many mass shooters coming out of the left. White nationalists are a joke, sure they have a couple gangs but they ain't even strong enough to go to war with the black gangs.
White nationalists taking over is a fucking joke, buddy. I don't know many black people but the ones I do have jobs, I've even sold to them weed. Lol
I'm against the left and their socialism just like any black people I know. They ain't open arms for Muslims either they are actually Americans unlike Muslims. Of course I'm in the second whitest state in the union, so what do I know? Lol, we still have black people just not like the south I swear they hate the cold, but so do I.
- Status
