We were discussing this 'blame' thing with the fires. Why do you not think that arsons are from just one subset of humans? I would think that the fire-bug tendencies are found in any group. Even gender-partiers of all types. Lightening and power lines will soon be labelled as affiliated with political leanings. Anyone who thinks it's just one party that has arsons is just not educated on the subject. And i would add that many with the arson complex end up as fire fighters. Suppose it's okay to call fire fighting a disease? If you need to vent about liberals, that's okay with me, just do it WELL. That one was pretty lame. The 'umbrella man' that was starting fires in the riots was supposedly 'conservative' trying to make it look like protesters. Why to people hone in on ONE specific event and then blame the whole 'other side'? Why do people continue to post and repost just to fan the flames?
I do tend to lean to the liberal end of the spectrum, i don't claim to be perfect, or that liberalism is perfect. I tend to see liberalism, in general, as foreward thinking, and conservatism is 'stay the same'. Nothing stays the same, so in limiting oneself to not going forward the only direction to go, is back. I know it's more complicated than that, but that's the main idea that guides my decision.
just had to tell a liberal to calm down, cuz they had the idea that it was conservatives that were doing all the arson. As in, helping the 'end of the world' happen. The name calling and finger pointing are not helping.
May everyone stay safe, do what you can to help others, and treat people like you would like to be treated. There is a reason for having more than one party, let them be.