-
Happy Birthday ICMag! Been 20 years since Gypsy Nirvana created the forum! We are celebrating with a 4/20 Giveaway and by launching a new Patreon tier called "420club". You can read more here.
-
Important notice: ICMag's T.O.U. has been updated. Please review it here. For your convenience, it is also available in the main forum menu, under 'Quick Links"!
House GOP blocks vote protecting med states
- Thread starter toxic hippie
- Start date
AgentPothead
Just this guy, ya know?
The feds can have my marijuana when they pull it from my cold, dead hands.
Sux. Its prob payback for yesterday's double cross deal with Schumie and Pelosi!
They thought they were gonna flex cause they got a mad dog in their kennel but their dogs off the fkn chain! Now theyre worried it's gonna kill everything that's locked in there with it!
Im just fkin around.lol
Listened to a yoytube interview about pit bulls.
Except it really does fkn SUCK!
They thought they were gonna flex cause they got a mad dog in their kennel but their dogs off the fkn chain! Now theyre worried it's gonna kill everything that's locked in there with it!
Im just fkin around.lol
Listened to a yoytube interview about pit bulls.
Except it really does fkn SUCK!
toxic hippie
Member
So much for states rights.....
There is this...
The committee’s removal of the medical marijuana protections from the House bill does not kill the amendment, and it still has a chance of making it into the legislation that lays out annual funding for the federal government. In late July, the Senate Appropriations Committee authorized the amendment for inclusion in the larger spending bill. Once the House version is passed, it faces reconciliation with that Senate version by a conference committee.
The committee’s removal of the medical marijuana protections from the House bill does not kill the amendment, and it still has a chance of making it into the legislation that lays out annual funding for the federal government. In late July, the Senate Appropriations Committee authorized the amendment for inclusion in the larger spending bill. Once the House version is passed, it faces reconciliation with that Senate version by a conference committee.
M
moose eater
it is already in the Senates version of the bill referenced, so it aint over. what has happened points out a huge flaw in how bills get voted on. if a chairman does not want a bill to be voted on, it does not get a hearing/vote. it does not matter if every swinging dick in the House is in favor & wants to vote, dickhead gets his way! you only have to bribe one asshole to fuck everything up...
Crazy Chester
Well-known member
That's the spirit, AgentPothead!
Crazy Chester
Well-known member
This type of bad behavior is just what California voters need to see - extra pothead votes and California will be its own country in 2020...
I'm a California Pothead and there's no way in hell I would be into it!
Good lord I hope all this talk of Cali breaking away is just a joke.
I wouldn't mind hearing the rest of the country telling us why they'd miss us though.
We just wanna be accepted!haha
Good lord I hope all this talk of Cali breaking away is just a joke.
I wouldn't mind hearing the rest of the country telling us why they'd miss us though.
We just wanna be accepted!haha
"If a law is unjust, a man is not only right to disobey it, he is obligated to do so."
Thomas Jefferson.
Thomas Jefferson.
100% agree while reserving the right to try and change said law while breaking it!lol
hahahahaha...FUCK Sessions ! Disclaimer {only on cannabis issues, otherwise I'm right with him....he is lacking in education on mary jane and...I feel brainwashed with the whole war on drugs movement...but on everything else...thumbs up!!!!}
As far as cannabis is concerned...Trump will decide what Sessions does and does not do. Sessions is not in charge of policy. Just wait and see...
Thank you !
Jefferson is my main man....I just wish today's youth would embrace.
Crazy Chester
Well-known member
Yup - anchors away!
