-
Happy Birthday ICMag! Been 20 years since Gypsy Nirvana created the forum! We are celebrating with a 4/20 Giveaway and by launching a new Patreon tier called "420club". You can read more here.
-
Important notice: ICMag's T.O.U. has been updated. Please review it here. For your convenience, it is also available in the main forum menu, under 'Quick Links"!
Let's Make TRUMP King
- Thread starter Jellyfish
- Start date
Switcher56
Comfortably numb!
He is a King of the jungle
Certainly not what I expected from a christian conservative. With all the whores and lying.
I wonder if jesus himself would support him?
I wonder if jesus himself would support him?
St. Phatty
Active member
Honesty in Advertising.
St. Phatty
Active member
'Boogieman'
Well-known member
I just like stirring the pot, Trump makes it easy to do.
Praise Tr*mp.
hmmm.
Sorry, I got nothing.
hmmm.
Sorry, I got nothing.
What kind of king? As far as I know there are only three scenarios in which he could rule as a King: Absolutism. Constitutional Monarchy or King of Cannabis.
Absolutism is what he does in practise. Regardless the lyrics, it's plain obvious that he pays attention to no one but himself. He recruits people that are supposedly agree with him in principle, but soon he fires them for not agreeing him, means whoever is still siding him is because they do as been told by King Donaldo I.
Constitutional Monarchy... Mmmh, no, I'm sorry, this is not that easy. This type of monarchy takes hundreds of years to achieve, you'd need to train at least three or four NEW generations of americans to appreciate this complex way of being a proper subdit. So, maybe his grand-grandsons could apply if they keep it up, starting by Ivanka of Barron winning the '24, '28, '32 and 2036 elections and then more Trumps. He'll be dead by then, though.
King of Cannabis. Maybe this is the easiest for him, as he only has to fight Arjan. Remember that a proper King doesn't need your worthless unimportant expendable ugly peasant approval, you only need that shit to elect presidents, but not kings. Kings declare themselves kings and then their closest friends hail them in a secret ceremony, that's all. All he has to do is manouvre to get the exclusive cannabis patent and license granted to one of his screen companies legalize to federal level the day before he leaves office and he'd be set up to battle Arjan, in a ring or something. On TV. Pay per view.
As side note, making your german surname sound english is not as simple as changing a couple of letters if you plan to be king. Ask the Windsors for further advice.
Absolutism is what he does in practise. Regardless the lyrics, it's plain obvious that he pays attention to no one but himself. He recruits people that are supposedly agree with him in principle, but soon he fires them for not agreeing him, means whoever is still siding him is because they do as been told by King Donaldo I.
Constitutional Monarchy... Mmmh, no, I'm sorry, this is not that easy. This type of monarchy takes hundreds of years to achieve, you'd need to train at least three or four NEW generations of americans to appreciate this complex way of being a proper subdit. So, maybe his grand-grandsons could apply if they keep it up, starting by Ivanka of Barron winning the '24, '28, '32 and 2036 elections and then more Trumps. He'll be dead by then, though.
King of Cannabis. Maybe this is the easiest for him, as he only has to fight Arjan. Remember that a proper King doesn't need your worthless unimportant expendable ugly peasant approval, you only need that shit to elect presidents, but not kings. Kings declare themselves kings and then their closest friends hail them in a secret ceremony, that's all. All he has to do is manouvre to get the exclusive cannabis patent and license granted to one of his screen companies legalize to federal level the day before he leaves office and he'd be set up to battle Arjan, in a ring or something. On TV. Pay per view.
As side note, making your german surname sound english is not as simple as changing a couple of letters if you plan to be king. Ask the Windsors for further advice.
I wish that we had a royal family we could elect out of office at the end of a 4-5 year term - then elect a new one - then many more people will get the chance to be royalty - it should be a public service position of a deserving family based upon certain merits - not a right for one particular family to rule forever.
Yeah - let everyone be King/Queen for a day.
Yeah - let everyone be King/Queen for a day.
Lost in a SOG
GrassSnakeGenetics
He should be king for the day..
Then murdered..
Then murdered..
Jesus did love his whores and sinners...
How much power does the Monarchy truly wield? I don't follow British politics too much (I do love the shouting in the House of Commons though!) But aren't they more or less just figure heads, not really delving into "ruling" too much?
We had Queen For A Day back in the day in the USA.
[YOUTUBEIF]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KrViH3V6uEM[/YOUTUBEIF]
Lost in a SOG
GrassSnakeGenetics
His morals suggest he would be nearer to the antichrist end of this human invented concept of good vs bad.
The fact that so many people cant see that just shows how twisted up the media has everybodies heads.
The fact that so many people cant see that just shows how twisted up the media has everybodies heads.
'Boogieman'
Well-known member
Trump is a result of middle America rejecting left wing policies. If the democrats keep pushing left wing candidates and socialism I expect Trump to win reelection. Many people still want a capitalist society to succeed, so they would rather deal with Trump then try socialist ideas, at least where I live anyway in the midwest.
M
Mr D
Recycled Alex Jones Bullshit...
https://www.infowars.com/king-obama-house-considers-repealing-22nd-amendment/
https://www.infowars.com/king-obama-house-considers-repealing-22nd-amendment/
If you make him King, you see that he has got no clothes.
St. Phatty
Active member
If you make him King, you see that he has got no clothes.
What is seen can not be unseen.
Maybe that's why they always made sure the king always had his robe.
White Beard
Active member
Kingship is tough stuff. If we go back far enough, we have Sacred Kings, but over time (that is, the coming of the Romans) that mutated into the “divine right” of kings.
Once the Romans put conquest and subjugation on the table, whoever led the victorious side in battle became king, or made someone else king. He also gave rank and property and titles to his generals, his advisors, and the people he needed on his side in the ‘new kingdom’.
The result, for us on the tail end of “western civilization”, was a form of society where the entitled literally owned everything not owned by the king and family. We call them ‘aristocrats’ now, lords and ladies and nobility, and they could get away with pretty much anything, as long as they didn’t piss off the stronger and better-armed.
Everyone else essentially worked for the aristocracy. They grew the food and caught the fish and raised the cattle and made the clothes and manned the armies and navies, and generally did the bulk of the living and dying, and some of it fed, dressed, entertained and housed the wealthy (just one operative word), who may or may not have paid anything for any of it. Why? Because the land they lived on was owned by the people who owned everything, and they were ‘kind of’ owned by the wealthy, too.
Our economies still run basically the same way: everything has to be owned. Even though we have a government instead of a king, that government has to “own” public space, or it will be encroached upon and occupied. The fact that the government holds property and resources in the name of the people means that the wealthy can’t just move in and take it, by force if necessary, for their exclusive use.
This is why the ruling class has seen to it that “government” became a dirty word over the last century (before 45 or so years ago, the “government” was seen amongst the white populations in the south (and elsewhere) as the enemy, still: the federal government of the United States of America, the first great experiment in national self-government in known history, is specifically the evil government that it’s so popular to kick these days.
No, it’s not perfect, but it was in fact designed to keep out kings....
Once the Romans put conquest and subjugation on the table, whoever led the victorious side in battle became king, or made someone else king. He also gave rank and property and titles to his generals, his advisors, and the people he needed on his side in the ‘new kingdom’.
The result, for us on the tail end of “western civilization”, was a form of society where the entitled literally owned everything not owned by the king and family. We call them ‘aristocrats’ now, lords and ladies and nobility, and they could get away with pretty much anything, as long as they didn’t piss off the stronger and better-armed.
Everyone else essentially worked for the aristocracy. They grew the food and caught the fish and raised the cattle and made the clothes and manned the armies and navies, and generally did the bulk of the living and dying, and some of it fed, dressed, entertained and housed the wealthy (just one operative word), who may or may not have paid anything for any of it. Why? Because the land they lived on was owned by the people who owned everything, and they were ‘kind of’ owned by the wealthy, too.
Our economies still run basically the same way: everything has to be owned. Even though we have a government instead of a king, that government has to “own” public space, or it will be encroached upon and occupied. The fact that the government holds property and resources in the name of the people means that the wealthy can’t just move in and take it, by force if necessary, for their exclusive use.
This is why the ruling class has seen to it that “government” became a dirty word over the last century (before 45 or so years ago, the “government” was seen amongst the white populations in the south (and elsewhere) as the enemy, still: the federal government of the United States of America, the first great experiment in national self-government in known history, is specifically the evil government that it’s so popular to kick these days.
No, it’s not perfect, but it was in fact designed to keep out kings....
