Freeman-on-the-land - Lawful not Legal

gaiusmarius said:

there are a couple of other matters that come to mind, one being, what if a country has recently had a referendum on a whole series of new drug laws, do they still only count as statutes or acts?

Click to expand...

gaiusmarius said:

the other point was the actual formulation of the notice, with your claim of right and fee schedule. i guess if their rebuttal's wording is so important, my original claim also needs to be flawlessly worded?

Click to expand...

gaiusmarius said:

we don't see the beginning of this encounter, for all we know he was calm to begin with, but once those so called peace officers laid hands on him he lost his cool, which is kinda natural imo if unjustly detained. i noticed that he refused to "understand" or "stand under" and his ranting seem to give him power somehow to withstand the effect of the tazer. but sure once you are wrangling on the floor with them you've normally lost lol.

Click to expand...

gaiusmarius said:

anyway maybe we should have a header at the top telling people that this is a theoretical discussion and relates to certain peoples research and beliefs pertaining to common law, which most law enforcement will not share.

Click to expand...

Duckmang said:

Thanks freeman for starting this thread. I am very compelled to follow up on all of the links posted.

I have one question pertaining to a situation I was in last year.....

2:00AM the LEO is knocking at my door wanting to come in and look around b/c of a supposed 911 call hangup from my address. My wife, in lockup for a DUI at the time, is a medical marijuana patient registered with the state. Needless to say I wasn't going to let them come in and look around, and didn't. I did however present them with my id upon request.

Say they wanted to try to catch me doing something next week, could they use that previous association with my fiction against me? Say the same officer "recognizes me" from before. Would I have to make a new association with my fiction, or could I just clam up and be safe?

Click to expand...

Winston Shrout said:

There's nothing evil about it folks, it just commerce...

Click to expand...

humble1 said:

I first heard about this "Freeman" malarkey when I was visiting our great neighbors to the north, Canada. Mostly used as a tax-dodge, although the folks who get caught generally are screwed unless there was a procedural error somewhere. I'm gonna tell you what I told them (you're all part of the Commonwealth, right?).
Our legal system is different here in the states. I understand this all came about because of the magna carta, and a few other legal precedents, but once you hit guilty until proven innocent vs. innocent until proven guilty everything is as different as night and day. I know what the Declaration of Independence, the Constitution and the Bill of rights say but the reality on the ground is different. Police can and do hold US citizens (even if they deny their citizenship) for 72 hours without cause of any kind nor expectation of legal consequences for either party.
JJ please move this to a UK forum so that innocent, ignorant Americans don't piss off cops with their perceptions of legal fictions.
Rant Off.

Click to expand...

Income Tax Act 2007 said:

Click to open 24 Reliefs deductible at Step 2
24
Reliefs deductible at Step 2
(1)
If the taxpayer is an individual, the provisions referred to at Step 2 of the calculation in section 23 are—
(a)
the following—
section 72 (early trade losses relief),
Chapter 6 of Part 4 (share loss relief),
Chapter 3 of Part 8 (gifts of shares, securities and real property to charities etc),
sections 457 and 458 of this Act or section 266(7) of ICTA (payments to trade unions or police organisations),
section 193(4) of FA 2004 (pension schemes: relief under net pay arrangement: excess relief), and
section 194(1) of FA 2004 (pension schemes: relief on making of claim), and
(b)
the following—
section 64 (trade loss relief against general income),
section 83 (carry-forward trade loss relief),
section 89 (terminal trade loss relief),
section 96 (post-cessation trade relief),
section 118 (carry-forward property loss relief),
section 120 (property loss relief against general income),
section 125 (post-cessation property relief),
section 128 (employment loss relief against general income),
section 152 (loss relief against miscellaneous income),
Chapter 1 of Part 8 (interest payments),
Chapter 4 of Part 8 (annual payments and patent royalties),
section 574 (manufactured dividends on UK shares: payments by non-companies),
section 579 (manufactured interest on UK securities: payments not otherwise deductible),
Part 2 of CAA 2001 (plant and machinery allowances), in a case where the allowance is to be given effect under section 258 of that Act (special leasing of plant and machinery),
Part 3 of CAA 2001 (industrial buildings allowances), in a case where the allowance is to be given effect under section 355 of that Act (buildings for miners etc: carry-back of balancing allowances),
Part 8 of CAA 2001 (patent allowances), in a case where the allowance is to be given effect under section 479 of that Act (persons having qualifying non-trade expenditure),
section 555 of ITEPA 2003 (deduction for liabilities related to former employment),
section 446 of ITTOIA 2005 (strips of government securities: relief for losses),
section 454(4) of ITTOIA 2005 (listed securities held since 26 March 2003: relief for losses: persons other than trustees), and
section 600 of ITTOIA 2005 (relief for patent expenses).
(2)
In any other case, the provisions referred to at Step 2 of the calculation in section 23 are—
(a)
the provisions listed in subsection (1)(b), and
(b)
section 505 (relief for trustees of unauthorised unit trust).

Click to expand...

SOVERIEGN DECLARATION & CLAIM OF*RIGHT
Aug 2, 07:30 PM
DECLARATION OF UNDERSTANDING & INTENT
I, the Freeman-on-the-Land, Upper-Case of the family Lower, a sovereign, flesh and blood Man and blessed living soul, who, according to the eye-witness testimony of my biological mother, separated from her womb in the General Hospital of the county borough of Place of Birth, on the Date of Birth, am equal in every conceivable way to every other blessed living soul in the Universe, and do hereby state clearly and unequivocally that the following is a Verified Plain Statement of the Facts as I perceive them.
Whereas, it is my understanding that:
1. Natural Law is the permanent underlying basis of all law, and theories of Natural Law have been an important part of jurisprudence throughout legal history. Natural Law is to be distinguished from Positive Law, which is the body of law created by Man. Natural Law is both anterior and superior to Positive Law (Oxford Dictionary Of Law 5th Edition ISBN0-19-860756-3 page 326), and,
2. The principals of Natural Law derive from the Fundamental Laws of the Universe, and,
3. The Fundamental Laws of the Universe are the law of attraction, the law of intent, the law of allowance and the law of balance, and,
4. The law of allowance dictates that all sentient beings in the Universe be allowed to exercise their own Freewill at all times, absolutely and without exception, and,
5. I, the Freeman-on-the-Land, Upper-Case of the family Lower, am a sentient being of light; a blessed living soul in the physical form of a flesh and blood Man; a fragment of Divine Consciousness with unalienable rights granted by the Creator of the Universe, and,
6. Common Law derives from Natural Law and applies to all blessed living souls on Planet Earth, dictating that we are all born free to do what we choose for ourselves, provided that we do not infringe the rights to life, freedom and property of another, and, 
7. The geographical area of Planet Earth commonly known as England is a Common Law jurisdiction, and, 
8. Parliament and the National Government of the United Kingdom are corporate entities, and as such, they are not immune from bankruptcy and insolvency laws, and, 
9. Corporate entities require voluntary agreements in order to claim authority or control over other parties, and,
10. No individual, whether Monarch, Prime Minister, Pope, politician, judge or public servant of any description, is above Universal, Natural or Common Law, and,
11. Equality before the law is paramount and mandatory, and,
12. A statute is defined as a legislated rule of society which has been given the force of law, and, 
13. A society is defined as a community of Men and Women joined by mutual trust and consent, to deliberate, determine and act for a common goal or purpose, and, 
14. The enforcement of government policy by coercive and deceptive methods is always and without exception a breach of Universal, Natural and Common Law, and, 
15. The only form of government recognised as lawful on Planet Earth is a representative one, and, 
16. Representative government necessarily requires the voluntary consent of the governed, and, 
17. In the absence of the voluntary consent of the governed, representative government cannot lawfully exist, and, 
18. Men and Women born anywhere on Planet Earth have a natural and unalienable right to self-determination, and can, at any time, choose to revoke or deny their consent to be governed, and, 
19. Any flesh and blood Man and blessed living soul who does revoke or deny his consent to be governed is free from government control and statutory obligations, restrictions and restraints of any and all descriptions, and, 
20. A Claim of Right establishes a lawful excuse, and that this factual truth is expressed by way of example in the Theft Act 1968 and the Criminal Damage Act 1971, where belief must be that the law creates and vests a specific right to act in a certain way. In English law, a limited form of statutory offense is termed “claim of right”. In Chamberlain v Lindon 1998 1 WLR 1252 [1], Lindon demolished a wall to protect a right-of-way. Despite allowing nine months to pass before acting, Lindon honestly believed that it was immediately necessary to protect his legal rights without having to resort to civil litigation. It is not necessary to decide whether Lindon’s action was justified as a matter of civil law. For the purposes of criminal law, what matters is whether Lindon believed that his actions were reasonable, i.e. a subjective test. Thus, a lawful excuse may be acknowledged by a court to arise when an individual, honestly, even if mistakenly, believes that their actions are necessary and reasonable, and, 
21. Any flesh and blood Man or Woman who has established lawful excuse is not in breach of any law in choosing to disobey any de facto court, tribunal, statute, act, bill, code, by-law, warrant or order, and, 
22. De facto means that something exists as a matter of fact rather than of legal right, while de jure means something exists as a matter of legal right, and,
23. All existing courts and governments on Planet Earth are de facto, and, 
24. Any and all agreements made for and on behalf of the people of Great Britain by Her Majesty’s Government, the CROWN, the National Government, its agencies, creditors, officers, partners, representatives and affiliates, or any other legal entity, organization or individual, do not in any way legally bind the Men and Women of Great Britain, unless there has been full disclosure of the terms of those agreements, as well as the establishment of mutual consent to those terms, and, 
25. I, the Freeman-on-the-Land, Upper-Case of the family Lower, have honorably refused to be bound by agreements made by corporate entities of any description without my explicit voluntary consent, since corporations are incapable of moral sensibilities and function only for the benefit their shareholders, often to the detriment of the community and the environment, and, 
26. The METROPOLITAN POLICE FORCES and their POLICY ENFORCEMENT OFFICERS are now, whether knowingly or unknowingly, protecting the interests of the National Government’s creditors, rather than the Men and Women of Great Britain, and, 
27. The METROPOLITAN POLICE FORCES and their POLICY ENFORCEMENT OFFICERS are now, whether knowingly or unknowingly, consistently failing to protect the rights to life, freedom and the peaceful possession of property of the Men and Women of Great Britain, and,
28. If POLICY ENFORCEMENT OFFICERS are not providing a service for an injured party who has given sworn testimony against another for unlawfully infringing their rights to life, freedom or property, there is no reason to stop, detain, question or search any flesh and blood Man or Woman, and, 
29. POLICY ENFORCEMENT OFFICERS who attempt to enforce statutes against a flesh and blood Man who has lawfully revoked his consent to be governed, are, in fact, breaching the peace, and,
30. Permanent estoppel by acquiescence, barring any POLICY ENFORCEMENT OFFICER, court or prosecutor from bringing charges against this flesh and blood Man and blessed living soul, under any act, bill, statute, by-law or code, will be automatically created if this DECLARATION OF UNDERSTANDING AND INTENT & CLAIM OF RIGHT is not rebutted by the Respondent, point for point, within the stipulated time and in the appropriate manner, and,
31. Historically, the purpose of a national armed force was to ensure that foreign powers never invaded and governed under a force of arms, and
32. The existence of armed militia patrolling and policing our streets is evidence of wars fought unsuccessfully and tyrannical government, and,
33. The law provides remedy at all times, even against rogue or negligent POLICY ENFORCEMENT OFFICERS, as well as de facto governments dominated by soulless corporate interests, and,
34. Any action for which Men and Women can apply for and receive a license must itself be a fundamentally lawful action, and, 
35. I am not a child, but a fully grown adult flesh and blood Man and blessed living soul, who operates with full responsibility and maximum freedom; therefore, I do not recognize any perceived obligation to ask permission to engage in lawful and peaceful activities, under any circumstances whatsoever, and, 
36. Legal entities are fictitious and as such do not have the capacity to exert any control or authority over blessed living souls who operate with regard to that knowledge, and, 
38. A summons is merely an invitation to appear and the ones issued by de facto courts are not dishonored if conditionally accepted upon receipt of irrefutable proof that there is an obligation for the recipient to attend, and, 
39. The Common Law right to travel on the highways without a license, provided I am not engaging in commerce thereupon, is lawful and still exists, despite being deceptively hidden from view, and, 
40. Clause 39 “No freeman shall be arrested or imprisoned or disseised or outlawed or exiled or in any way victimized, neither will we attack him or send anyone to attack him, except by the lawful judgment of his peers or by the law of the land”, and clause 40 “To no-one will we refuse or delay right or justice”, of the original Magna Carta of 1215 are still in full force and effect, and that the expression “law of the land” means Common Law.
41. I have the power to appoint a Notary Public or an officer of the court to act on my behalf, therefore, I also have the power to perform those duties myself, and, 
42. Living freely in peace is within my community’s standards and does not create any loss, injury, damage or liability, or comprise a breach the peace in any way whatsoever, and,
43. The act of registering the birth of a baby creates an entity called a LEGAL PERSON, which exists in association with that baby, and, 
44. This creation of the LEGAL PERSON is not disclosed to a baby’s parents when they apply for a certificate of live birth for their child, nor is the creation of a Life Annuity that is solely dependent upon the life that baby, and, 
45. I, the Freeman-on-the-Land commonly known as Upper-Case of the family Lower, have, since the eighth year of this physical incarnation, been used as surety for the debts of the National Government and security for the Bank of England’s fiat currency, and,
46. I, the Freeman-on-the-Land commonly known as Upper-Case of the family Lower, have no legal or lawful obligation to obey the orders of any individual, organization or legal entity claiming to be acting on behalf of the Queen or King or Pope, including but not limited to, agents, officers, partners and affiliates of THE CROWN, THE VATICAN, THE UNITED NATIONS and THE EUROPEAN UNION, as well as the National Government of the UNITED KINGDOM, its agents, officers, partners, affiliates, creditors and cash-confiscatory departments, since I do not grant my consent to any authority that they might claim to have over me, under any circumstances whatsoever, and, 
52. I, the Freeman-on-the-Land commonly known as Upper-Case of the family Lower, hereby lawfully revoke my consent to be governed.
DECLARATION OF INTENT
Therefore, be it now known to any and all interested, concerned or affected parties, that I, Upper-Case of the family Lower, the sovereign, flesh and blood, Freeman-on-the-Land, do hereby declare my intent to live in peace under Universal, Natural and Common Law, free from all statutory obligations of any and all descriptions, and to travel freely without charges, delays or disruptions, whether traveling domestically or crossing international borders in my private sovereign capacity, and to trade, create, exchange and exist without governance anywhere on Planet Earth, and I hereby state my intention to do so without limitations, restrictions or regulations created by individuals, organizations and/or legal entities, without my explicit voluntary consent.
CLAIM OF RIGHT
1. I claim the right to deny my consent to interact or co-operate with de facto government agents, officials, bailiffs and grossly negligent POLICY ENFORCEMENT OFFICERS. 
2. I claim a right to possess, use and enjoy my property, without having to pay for the use or enjoyment of it. 3. I claim the right to view my community as Mankind on Planet Earth, and that my course of action is not outside said community’s standards, and will in fact support Mankind’s universal desire for truth, peace, maximum freedom and soulfulfillment. 
4. I claim the right not to be compelled to perform under any contract or commercial agreement that I did not enter into knowingly, voluntarily and intentionally, and I do not accept the liability of the compelled benefits of any contract or commercial agreement that was not fully disclosed to me prior to its execution.
5. I claim that all property held in my possession, including without limitation, the property itemized in Commercial Security Agreement Unique ID Number, is held under this Claim of Right, and cannot be seized, confiscated or inspected without my written and notarized consent. 
6. I claim the right to use all necessary means to protect my property, and do not consent to any individual, organization or legal entity claiming the right to use force or violence in regard to my property. 
7. I claim the right to use all necessary means to protect my physical body in all circumstances, and do not consent to any individual, organization or legal entity claiming the right to use force or violence in regard to my physical body. 
8. I claim the right to refuse to supply an intimate or non-intimate sample of my DNA for any purpose whatsoever, without my written and notarized voluntary consent.
9. I claim the right to refuse to supply samples of my blood and/or urine for any purpose whatsoever, without my written and notarized voluntary consent. 10. I claim the right to refuse to be medicated, whether by any individual, government, corporation and/or legal entity, by any means whatsoever, without my written and notarized voluntary consent.
11. I claim the right to grow, harvest, store, trade, sell, barter and/or use for my own purposes, any and all organic substances that grow naturally upon Planet Earth. 
12. I claim the right to refuse to be bound by the judgments, orders, warrants or rulings of the de facto courts of the UNITED KINGDOM, the EUROPEAN UNION and/or the UNITED NATIONS, under any circumstances whatsoever.
13. I claim the right to receive any and all dividends and/or beneficial interest derived from any and all annuities, securities, bonds, trusts and the like, associated with my LEGAL PERSON, STRAWMAN (and all derivatives thereof), that may have been generated since its registration in the county borough of Place of Birth, on the Date of Birth. 
14. I claim the rights of a Secured Party Creditor to the STRAWMAN (and all derivatives thereof) Trust, as well as any and all parties doing business as the same without full disclosure and my express authorization and/or consent. 15. I claim the right to any and all beneficial interest of the STRAWMAN (and all derivatives thereof) Trust. 16. I claim the right to charge a FEE SCHEDULE, for any transgressions by POLICY ENFORCEMENT OFFICERS, de facto government principals, officers, agents or justice system participants, of THREE THOUSAND POUNDS STERLING PER HOUR or portion thereof, if being questioned, interrogated or in any way detained, harassed or otherwise regulated, and THIRTY THOUSAND GB POUNDS STERLING PER HOUR or portion thereof, if I am handcuffed, transported, incarcerated or subjected to any adjudication process without my express written and notarized consent, and THREE MILLION GB POUNDS for any grievous or actual physical harm to my body. 
17. I claim the right to use any and all administrative and/or judicial processes in order to secure payment of the aforementioned FEE SCHEDULE against any transgressors, who, by their actions or omissions, harm me, my dependents or my interests, directly or by proxy, in any way whatsoever. 18. I claim the right to Sovereign Diplomatic Immunity, pursuant to private and international law. 19. I claim the right to amend this Claim of Right, as and when necessary, and at my sole discretion.
SOVEREIGN AFFIRMATION
I, the Freeman-on-the-Land, Upper-Case of the family Lower, a sovereign, flesh and blood Man and blessed living soul, hereby affirm upon my full commercial liability and under penalty of perjury, that the entirety of the foregoing is a lawful amendment to the Notice of Understanding and Intent & Claim of Right referenced herein.
By:________________________________
Freeman-on-the-Land Upper-Case of the family Lower 
WITHOUT PREJUDICE – WITHOUT RECOURSE – NON-ASSUMPSIT
All Rights Reserved – Errors & Omissions Excepted
Executed in the presence of:
Notary Public: Notary Seal:
Signature:____________________________
Directions for response
All interested, concerned and affected parties wishing to dispute the claims made herein or to make their own counterclaims must respond appropriately within SEVEN (7) DAYS of service of notice of this action. Responses must be under oath or attestation, upon full commercial liability and under penalty of perjury, and received at the Notary Public’s office no later than ten days from the date of original service, as attested to by way of certified mail receipt.
Failure to register a dispute against the claims made herein will result in an automatic administrative default judgment, securing forevermore all rights herein claimed, and establishing permanent and irrevocable estoppel by acquiescence, forevermore barring the bringing of charges under any statute, bill, by-law, code or act against the Freeman-on-the-Land Upper-Case of the family Lower.

Click to expand...