Although I`ve heard nothing but good things about the 315`s , watts per sq ft is watts per sq ft , regardless...and....
Using the old standard of 50 watts per sq ft being optimum for photosynthesis indoors , you`re already less than optimal with room 1 and only 4500 watts instead of 6000 + in a 125+/- sq ft room , not to mention the 3660 watts in room 2.......that said....
6-1KW`s would be top shelf coverage if environment can be maintained , but I`m also anxious to see the outcome with the 6-750`s due to the new DE fixtures to see if they do better than conventional HPS.....anyways.....Awesome work Bro , and yeah I agree with you on changing out room 2 with the same 6 -750 setup regardless of being 3 weeks in.....can only help....
Especially since you can dim the fixtures to get em through any lumen shock that may occur initially from upping the wattage , so good luck and here`s hoping for heavy harveys from both rooms.....
Peace.....DHF.......
Wattage a square foot sorta gets thrown out with DE HPS and the 315cmh, since they're both pushing the boundaries of efficiency.
The ideal footprint of the 750W DE's is about 3.75x4.24 feet, we've got basically lighting for a 12.75ft x 7.5ft canopy over a 12 ft x7ft canopy
For 600hps , the euro standard is 1x1m but the length of the bulb technically can be a more rectangular part of the canopy. So each 600w is essentially lighting 3x3.25 feet. The 315w have a canopy of 3x3 feet, so they mix well with the 600s in that room.
so overall the canopy isn't 100% maximized, but I'm comfortable with it. considering my overall costs are very low.
Honestly I should get a par meter and really see whats happening though.
Last edited: