What's new
  • Happy Birthday ICMag! Been 20 years since Gypsy Nirvana created the forum! We are celebrating with a 4/20 Giveaway and by launching a new Patreon tier called "420club". You can read more here.
  • Important notice: ICMag's T.O.U. has been updated. Please review it here. For your convenience, it is also available in the main forum menu, under 'Quick Links"!

Vote Republicann!!

White Beard

Active member
Libertarians are anarchists.

Why not vote Bernie?

With respect, libertarians aren’t anarchists, they’re social darwinists. They believe in government, they just believe it’s proper role is making sure no one interferes with them doing what they want...baby autocrats
 

mean mr.mustard

I Pass Satellites
Veteran
Point taken.

I usually find that those who use the term libertarian to be Tea Party converts.

There are those who see it for what it is.

Then there are those who twist it to fit them or those they seek to label.

In that way it's kind of like democratic socialism.
 

White Beard

Active member
Or maybe instead of voting for Democrats and Republicans we might smarten up and vote Libertarian.... Make America free again!!

Given that the foundations Cato, Reason, Heritage, and American Enterprise Institute are, like the Libertarian and Republican parties and ALEC (American Legislative Exchange Council), wholly-owned subsidiaries of Koch Industries, I don’t think that would be very smart at all.

They’re the ones trying to take the government away from the people, and they’ll do it, too, if they ever have a one-party administration (including SCOTUS) *and* enough state governors/legislatures to auto-ratify their new upper-crust constitution.

They were one good election away from pulling it off, until the ‘18: instead of picking up the last few states they needed, GOP lost states AND lost the house. That was a real setback for them, as they’re set up to lose even bigger in ‘20.
 

armedoldhippy

Well-known member
Veteran
Point taken.

I usually find that those who use the term libertarian to be Tea Party converts.

There are those who see it for what it is.

Then there are those who twist it to fit them or those they seek to label.

In that way it's kind of like democratic socialism.

libertarians here are referred to (somewhat accurately) as "pot-smoking Republicans". labels can be very deceiving/inaccurate.
 

Absolem

Active member
Ah, the old Tea Party. The people who cared about deficits until a republican was elected. Now they are just fervent Trump supporters complaining about the people who criticize him. The same people who got in people's faces at town halls and shouted down many town halls to the point the event was cancelled now bitch about how divisive society is.

picture.php
 

SIG

Member
They all have to appeal to some majority they really are a mirror or wierd representation or amalgamation of different groups fears etc. People large groups of America are so freaking easy to manipulate with a few slogans to fire them up. Look at the Russian stuff they injected into the election.

Black lives matter because a group fears them they are taking our guns and Obama never took one nobody does abortion fired up so many so hot its crazy. Nobody has any more attention span than a few slogans. Fear motivates people to vote.

As long as we are represented by ignorant flashy actors appealing to base fears frankly were fucked. I cant believe there isnt an exam to test how much someone knows about anything and we hand them the keys.

Are these the two smartest best people to lead us and not start wars or all the other really stupid shit they all do? Their personal beliefs shouldnt even be known they should be the best at evaluating whats best for the people now and years from now.

This is getting really scary. When every scientist in the world say climate change is an issue and our leader says no its not and changes shit accordingly something is wrong. Were going to hell in a hand basket.

We get the leaders we deserve and I'm afraid we deserve to to have the world collapse financially or war or all the shit we race toward with glee every day. Its sad. Humans are dumb as dirt. The future generations will judge us worse than those that killed the buffalo. They will be right. We ask for these leaders.
 

SIG

Member
Choosing between then really is like convict butt rape logic. You gotta pick one or get stucj with the other. But I say fk it the only way to win is not to play the game. There arn't enough to change the system because it reflects the masses fears or the politicians do. None of them give one iota about Truth.

The world will eventually implode and a few will start over and it might be good for a bit, probably not. Then it will start all over. There has never been a true agrarian civilization. If your not conquering your being conquered.

In Guns Germs and Steel it showed the reason we had all those buffalo is the systems were out of balance due to natives burning the forests to make meadows for bison. The whole plains of grass were trees that's why there were so many, naturally it wouldnt have happened.

Im named after a Cherokee chief ancestor guess what he had black slaves and did a bunch of nefarious shit. The conquistadors only won because so many neighboring tribes were sick of being killed. I think humans are just violent and stupid maybe. A peaceful civilization will just be wiped out and their shit stolen.

I think maybe the old LSD chemists had it right we need to completely evolve past all this shit or were through.

I tossed in about the ancestor name sake because I figured someone would comment about the bison thing. I'm native and in my opinion if we had guns first we would have done it too. Its in all our nature.

I started thinking about third world countries full of resources that always fail and thought I should develop a computer program to run those countries without a greedy human element. I mean its easy basic shit, dont steal all the money invest in infrastructure etc. You dont want an abortion don't have one dont let crazy people buy dozens of guns and cammo underwear, smoke pot or not dont hurt anyone leave others be...or it is THE FARM!
 

White Beard

Active member
Choosing between then really is like convict butt rape logic. You gotta pick one or get stucj with the other. But I say fk it the only way to win is not to play the game. There arn't enough to change the system because it reflects the masses fears or the politicians do. None of them give one iota about Truth.

The world will eventually implode and a few will start over and it might be good for a bit, probably not. Then it will start all over. There has never been a true agrarian civilization. If your not conquering your being conquered.

In Guns Germs and Steel it showed the reason we had all those buffalo is the systems were out of balance due to natives burning the forests to make meadows for bison. The whole plains of grass were trees that's why there were so many, naturally it wouldnt have happened.

Im named after a Cherokee chief ancestor guess what he had black slaves and did a bunch of nefarious shit. The conquistadors only won because so many neighboring tribes were sick of being killed. I think humans are just violent and stupid maybe. A peaceful civilization will just be wiped out and their shit stolen.

I think maybe the old LSD chemists had it right we need to completely evolve past all this shit or were through.

I tossed in about the ancestor name sake because I figured someone would comment about the bison thing. I'm native and in my opinion if we had guns first we would have done it too. Its in all our nature.

I started thinking about third world countries full of resources that always fail and thought I should develop a computer program to run those countries without a greedy human element. I mean its easy basic shit, dont steal all the money invest in infrastructure etc. You dont want an abortion don't have one dont let crazy people buy dozens of guns and cammo underwear, smoke pot or not dont hurt anyone leave others be...or it is THE FARM!

Unfortunately the problem is deeper and wider than a Matthew Broderick movie: consider the fact that half the eligible voters don’t vote - and that’s not ‘new’. “Not playing” is how we ended up in the mess we’re in...it’s *certainly* not going to get us out of it.

BTW - how long ago did the Great Forest become the Great Plains?
 

Cannavore

Well-known member
Veteran
Bernie wants the opposite of small government which is a must if your libertarian, he will never get my vote.
Repealing the war on drugs
Ending the foreign wars
Breaking up the banks
Ending tax breaks for fortune 500 companies and billionaires (taxpayer handouts)

Would do more for the "muh small govt" crowd than anything proposed by either party. The idea that the GOP are a small government party is pure fantasy.


With respect, libertarians aren’t anarchists, they’re social darwinists. They believe in government, they just believe it’s proper role is making sure no one interferes with them doing what they want...baby autocrats

American fascists hijacked the term. Libertarian used to mean anarchist and socialist before that.

Go back and look at the 1980 Koch libertarian presidential platform. It's fascism plain and simple.

bJxBkau.jpg


https://www.democracynow.org/2016/1/20/dark_money_jane_mayer_on_how
 
Top