What's new
  • Happy Birthday ICMag! Been 20 years since Gypsy Nirvana created the forum! We are celebrating with a 4/20 Giveaway and by launching a new Patreon tier called "420club". You can read more here.
  • Important notice: ICMag's T.O.U. has been updated. Please review it here. For your convenience, it is also available in the main forum menu, under 'Quick Links"!

The Day Aussie Freedom Died - David Icke Banned from the 'Land of Freedom'

T

Teddybrae

Hey ... I have this great ending for this thread if no one has more to say ... ?

A nice looking middle aged lady (or maybe she was only a woman) on ABC television said of our present Government that:


"They are so far to the right of the Electorate that they are talking to themselves." (Summers, ABC Television, 6th March 2019)
 

Mick

Member
Veteran
lol it pissed down here mick, even had some hail, you'll be right, it be cold as soon

Vote 1 for the UN world government, and you get a couple of immigrants to look after you in ya old age, fuck knows who looks after them in their old age, i'm sure the UN will have a plan.

Its probably called eugenics, socialist love that sort of shit

G'day Teddy:biglaugh:

We got a bit of rain but not much. The helicopters were going overhead until about 2 this morning, which is a first. From what I hear the fires are big but just running along the ground, like a big uncontrolled burn.
When my body gives out, I'm checking out.
Eugenics was practiced in the west for years and imo is still being practiced today. There's a sperm bank for beautiful people and there was one for high IQ's. Now we can select for sex, eye colour, etc. But then there's the opposite. Being more or less a compassionate society, we keep people alive with genetic diseases that would of in the past died, and then they go have children with the same genetic problems. Not difficult to see where this leads. It's putting the kibosh on natural selection and survival of the fittest, but there's no way around it.
 

armedoldhippy

Well-known member
Veteran
But then there's the opposite. Being more or less a compassionate society, we keep people alive with genetic diseases that would of in the past died, and then they go have children with the same genetic problems. Not difficult to see where this leads. It's putting the kibosh on natural selection and survival of the fittest, but there's no way around it.

you are spot on. homo sapiens is the only animal that puts forth any effort to keep inferior/defective members of the species alive. even our wonderful dogs will kill puppies if they detect something wrong with them. have seen this first-hand...Mother Nature can be a ringtailed bitch sometimes.
 

Tangwena

Well-known member
Veteran
Hey ... I have this great ending for this thread if no one has more to say ... ?

A nice looking middle aged lady (or maybe she was only a woman) on ABC television said of our present Government that:


"They are so far to the right of the Electorate that they are talking to themselves." (Summers, ABC Television, 6th March 2019)
So true its frightening I dont believe they have a clue what the people really want.
 

Mick

Member
Veteran
you are spot on. homo sapiens is the only animal that puts forth any effort to keep inferior/defective members of the species alive. even our wonderful dogs will kill puppies if they detect something wrong with them. have seen this first-hand...Mother Nature can be a ringtailed bitch sometimes.

Yeah, it's a curly one. It's seen as immoral to let someone die when they can be saved, and then pass their genetic flaws on to their kids, but it could be seen as equally immoral to have a sickly child born because of those parents genetic diseases. Maybe we need some kind of vetting or license system before we can become a breeder, and treat breeding as a privilege and not a right. Around here you need a license for just about everything else. At the end of the day our human moralities won't count for shit, as evolution has a way of sorting things out.
 

armedoldhippy

Well-known member
Veteran
Yeah, it's a curly one. It's seen as immoral to let someone die when they can be saved, and then pass their genetic flaws on to their kids, but it could be seen as equally immoral to have a sickly child born because of those parents genetic diseases. Maybe we need some kind of vetting or license system before we can become a breeder, and treat breeding as a privilege and not a right. Around here you need a license for just about everything else. At the end of the day our human moralities won't count for shit, as evolution has a way of sorting things out.

"you must pass some rep around blahblahblah... before giving Mick any more reputation, bozo." snarky computers, lol.:)
 
Top