What's new
  • Happy Birthday ICMag! Been 20 years since Gypsy Nirvana created the forum! We are celebrating with a 4/20 Giveaway and by launching a new Patreon tier called "420club". You can read more here.
  • Important notice: ICMag's T.O.U. has been updated. Please review it here. For your convenience, it is also available in the main forum menu, under 'Quick Links"!

America

Status
Not open for further replies.

Hermanthegerman

Know your rights
Veteran
picture.php
 

Mick

Member
Veteran
"U.S. Government Continues to Pay Out Millions to Victims Injured by the Flu Shot."

Interesting read. I think flu vaccines were discussed here.

"""""""""""The NVICP was started as a result of a law passed in 1986 that gave pharmaceutical companies total legal immunity from being sued due to injuries and deaths resulting from vaccines. Drug manufacturers in the vaccine market can now create as many new vaccines as they desire, with no risk of being sued if their product causes injury or death. '''''''''''''''

https://healthimpactnews.com/2018/u...-millions-to-victims-injured-by-the-flu-shot/
 

kickarse

Active member
Fabian Society....

Fabian Society, socialist society founded in 1884 in London, having as its goal the establishment of a democratic socialist state in Great Britain. The Fabians put their faith in evolutionary socialism rather than in revolution.



Fabian Socialism

As the anarcho-communists argued for a form of socialism so decentralized that it required the abolition of the state, a milder and markedly centralist version of socialism, Fabianism, emerged in Britain. Fabian Socialism was so called because the members of the Fabian Society…

The name of the society is derived from the Roman general Fabius Cunctator, whose patient and elusive tactics in avoiding pitched battles secured his ultimate victory over stronger forces. Its founding is attributed to Thomas Davidson, a Scottish philosopher, and its early members included George Bernard Shaw, Sidney Webb, Annie Besant, Edward Pease, and Graham Wallas. Shaw and Webb, later joined by Webb’s wife, Beatrice, were the outstanding leaders of the society for many years.

In 1889 the society published its best-known tract, Fabian Essays in Socialism, edited by Shaw. It was followed in 1952 by New Fabian Essays, edited by Richard H.S. Crossman.

The Fabians at first attempted to permeate the Liberal and Conservative parties with socialist ideas, but later they helped to organize the separate Labour Representation Committee, which became the Labour Party in 1906. The Fabian Society has since been affiliated with the Labour Party.

The national membership of the Fabian Society has never been very great (at its peak in 1946 it had only about 8,400 members), but the importance of the society has always been much greater than its size might suggest. Generally, a large number of Labour members of Parliament in the House of Commons, as well as many of the party leaders, are Fabians, and, in addition to the national society, there are scores of local Fabian societies.

The principal activities of the society consist in the furtherance of its goal of socialism through the education of the public along socialist lines by means of meetings, lectures, discussion groups, conferences, and summer schools; carrying out research into political, economic, and social problems; and publishing books, pamphlets, and periodicals.

In 1931 the New Fabian Research Bureau was established as an independent body. The bureau and the society amalgamated in 1938 to form a new and revitalized Fabian Society. In 1940 the Colonial Bureau of the Fabian Society was established, and it produced a continuous stream of discussion and writing on colonial questions.

The Fabian International Bureau was started in 1941 to cater to the growing concern of Fabians with foreign policy and the great issues of war and peace.

From the Encyclopedia Britannia

That's about the last place I would get me information from.
You underestimate the influence of the Fabians
they run the show, world wide, for the elite
the league of nations/UN who founded them ?


Rothschild's
Rockefellers
financed them
Do your own research, as they say in the share trading world
you might be surprised what you find out


https://digital.library.lse.ac.uk/collections/fabiansociety/tracts1884-1901
go's up to the year 2000,
 
Last edited:

Gypsy Nirvana

Recalcitrant Reprobate -
Administrator
Veteran
Yeah man......I know quite a few people that could use a HUGH can of 'Laugh It Off'....LMFAO!

*mind you, a nice fat spliff usually works for me.
 

igrowone

Well-known member
Veteran
an interesting point of view from one account of japan's strategy after 1942
1942 - after the battle of midway
the ruling elite knows japan has lost the war
so how do they proceed? make a crappy peace to spare the suffering of the masses?
100's of thousands dead and for what? is on everyone's lips
no, that will result in a furious population, they could foresee a former private walking up to an army general and spitting on him
and feel perfectly justified in doing so
the people might even want the dissolution of the imperial family
the only solution, the fight must go on until the blood flows so deep that the people cry out 'enough!'
and so the people have fought poorly and let the emperor down
the emperor, being moved by the suffering of his people will then negotiate a peace
from this point of view, the atomic bombs were a godsend, the perfect point to begin the peace
and it actually did work out well for the imperial family
 

Hermanthegerman

Know your rights
Veteran
Just saw a 45 Minute documentation about the black heart of the USA, west virginia, tough people, respect, 2 the coalminers. Working 6 days, 10-11 hrs, it´s clear with 5o roundabout, they get a black Lounge or pain in the bones. If you are in the Union u r out. A woman said,: Why are we so poor? The America was build with our coal?
Some hrs earlier, I saw a documentation about africa, where they search 4 Diamonds and the People asked,: Why are we poor? Since Generations, they collect Diamonds here. Nothing of the Money Comes 2 the People.
And I ask myself, why don´t americans haven´t the will to Change their bad Situation on work? Why are the unions so powerless. I don´t want to judge. Sad to say, I always come back to the same thought, it´s the green, the Money, the greed. The Dollar blinded everything. Maybe it´s worldwide the same but the capitalists exploit the People and the american workers are proud of the systhem that exploits them.

It´s funny, I am not a communist but as an european I see the world different as an american. Fom another point of view.
 

mean mr.mustard

I Pass Satellites
Veteran


Why do effects have to dictate causes?

Why can't we study gun control laws as a reaction to instead of a cause of increasing violent crimes?

It sends an absurd message to assume otherwise.... At least to me.

The Civil War would be a great example of more guns helping the affliction guns bring when you include conviction and blame with extreme prejudice.

That's why real men drink whiskey. I don't know any men who drink IPA beer regularly it's too expensive, we just trying to get drunk and fuck women. :biggrin:

And possible soy boy or not I think whiskey and beer are both attainable at home by the same standards we hold our grass to.

No reason to bring money into it.

That being said... I've grown my own hops and malted my own barley.

I've distilled my own whiskey and brewed plenty of beer.

That helps the expense infinitely.

That being said.... I'm drunk and I'm going to fuck my woman.

Keep growing!

:joint:
 

jimdc

Member
Why do effects have to dictate causes?

Why can't we study gun control laws as a reaction to instead of a cause of increasing violent crimes?

It sends an absurd message to assume otherwise.... At least to me.

The Civil War would be a great example of more guns helping the affliction guns bring when you include conviction and blame with extreme prejudice.

because the left blames gun violence on the nra and republicans any chance they get yet ignore the gun violence in their own cities. if democraps would stop shooting people, gun violence would drop by 95%. gun violence is high in democrap cities because law abiding citizens are not allowed to own guns and criminals know that. common sense escapes liberals.
 

mean mr.mustard

I Pass Satellites
Veteran
I admit common sense seems uncommon these days.

Again, why can't evidence that gun violence brings gun control be found?

I find your data to be just that.
 

Bwanabud

Active member
The diabolical madness that would encourage an individual to murder/slaughter countless people, whether in a church/school/gay bar/movie theater...certainly isn't party nor ideology driven or induced.

It's a sick mf'r that chooses to take innocent lives with him on the way out, whether a car/gun/bomb/poison/steak knife is used as the tool of destruction of pain/inhumanity.

Anyone choosing to point across the isle at political differences, as the motivating cause of such violent atrocities is on a tainted NRA Koolaide acid trip....the same babbling rhetoric that ensures complacency and halts change.
 

trichrider

Kiss My Ring
Veteran
uh... maybe because NRA advocates for self-protection against psychopaths as well as for sporting purposes.
guns don't kill, but are used by psychologically ill persons prompted by propagandists who desire to limit or destroy ones ability to protect themselves.
2nd amendment protects all others.
 

bigtacofarmer

Well-known member
Veteran
uh... maybe because NRA advocates for self-protection against psychopaths as well as for sporting purposes.
guns don't kill, but are used by psychologically ill persons prompted by propagandists who desire to limit or destroy ones ability to protect themselves.
2nd amendment protects all others.


Maybe they should start endorsing water guns with LSD.


Seriously though. Its about time.
 

Bwanabud

Active member
uh... maybe because NRA advocates for self-protection against psychopaths as well as for sporting purposes.
guns don't kill, but are used by psychologically ill persons prompted by propagandists who desire to limit or destroy ones ability to protect themselves.
2nd amendment protects all others.

Uh, I have no problem with protecting one self or property, nor the second amendment...but the NRA the propagandists/lobbyist that try to control the minds of weak individuals(watch NRA TV sometime for a good laugh), and dictate law for their own financial gain(yes we support teachers carrying guns in school, because they will need 50 million dollars in weapons/training to be certified) :tiphat:
 

Bud Green

I dig dirt
Veteran
Guns are used by psychopaths for sporting purposes.

Mr. Mustard; I am surprised that you got 4 thumbs up on your comment already...

I do agree with you that a few (very few) psychopaths do use guns for ill intent.
I don't believe that these psychopaths considered what they did to be "sport"... They just wanted to kill people..

I don't hunt, yet I do own a few guns.. 2 handguns (one small revolver and one semi-auto) and 2 long guns. (a .22 magnum and a 12 gauge, pump shotgun)

The 2 long guns are used to control varmints that get in my garden.
(I live way out in the woods)
But that shotgun is also in case some one decides to come to my house with bad intent..
(Thankfully, in the 35 years I've owned it, I've never needed it for that)
But for the $250 I paid for it, I consider to be "cheap insurance", for "just in case".

From reading other posts of yours, I get the impression that you don't like guns at all, and would just as soon pass a law making them all illegal.
But the bad guys don't pay attention to the laws that tell them not to rob me at my house.
I don't believe they would pay any more attention to the law that tells them they can't have a gun....

I have guns for "just in case" one of those kind of people decides to come to my house in the middle of the night and try to take what is mine, and hurt me, if need be, in the process..
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top