Trump victory thread!

Amynamous said:

The south florida hispanic votes were primarily from Cuban Americans.
Cuban Americans receive very special treatment in the US and their opinions/attitudes are not necessarily indicative of other hispanic communities.

Click to expand...

eugenegreen said:

... wow, this is precisely the type of filth
that got trump voted out....

find peace in your life... and a conscience.

Click to expand...

Badfishy1 said:

I have plenty of peace in my life. Pretty amazing how you went straight to bootyhurt when you were called out on you liberal elitist simp narrative. Same people crying muh social distance yet live in a building with 1000 other people. The big city flex is laughable. In some way you consider yourself ‘woke’ while having to step over piles of human shit. City dwellers are a net drain on society.

Click to expand...

Amynamous said:

The south florida hispanic votes were primarily from Cuban Americans.
Cuban Americans receive very special treatment in the US and their opinions/attitudes are not necessarily indicative of other hispanic communities.

Click to expand...

Badfishy1 said:

I have plenty of peace in my life. Pretty amazing how you went straight to bootyhurt when you were called out on you liberal elitist simp narrative. Same people crying muh social distance yet live in a building with 1000 other people. The big city flex is laughable. In some way you consider yourself ‘woke’ while having to step over piles of human shit. City dwellers are a net drain on society.

Click to expand...

bigtacofarmer said:

Do us a favor. Quit using any products manufactured in a city.

Go ahead. Imagine a life where you make everything you need. Cars, computers, plastic.

Click to expand...

Badfishy1 said:

When you finish your soy latte, go ahead and eat the piles of shit in front of your overpriced 800^2 ft apartment. Your landlord would appreciate you cleaning up your community. Also your manufacturing factories were sold to China during Hussein era.

Click to expand...

bigtacofarmer said:

Do us a favor. Quit using any products manufactured in a city.

Go ahead. Imagine a life where you make everything you need. Cars, computers, plastic.

Click to expand...

Badfishy1 said:

I have plenty of peace in my life. Pretty amazing how you went straight to bootyhurt when you were called out on you liberal elitist simp narrative. Same people crying muh social distance yet live in a building with 1000 other people. The big city flex is laughable. In some way you consider yourself ‘woke’ while having to step over piles of human shit. City dwellers are a net drain on society.

Click to expand...

“Agreement among the States to Elect the President by National Popular Vote”February 13, 2020The National Popular Vote bill will guarantee the Presidency to the candidate who receives the most popular votes in all 50 states and the District of Columbia. Since 2006, the National Popular Vote bill has been enacted by 15 states and the District of Columbia (together possessing 196electoral votes), including 4small states (DE, HI, RI, VT), 8medium-sized states (CO, CT, MD, MA, NJ, NM, OR, WA), and 3bigstates (CA,IL, NY). The bill will take effect when enacted by states with 74more electoral votes(for a total of 270). The bill has passed at least one legislative chamber in 9additional states with 88electoral votes(AR, AZ, ME, MI,MN,NC, NV, OK, VA), including the Republican-controlled Arizona House and Oklahoma Senate.3,471state legislators have endorsed it.The U.S. Constitution (Article II) gives states exclusive control over awarding their electoral votes:“Each State shall appoint, in such Manner as the Legislature thereof may direct, a Number of Electors....” The shortcomings of the current system stem from state“winner-take-all” laws that award all of a state’s electoral votes to the candidate receiving the most popular votes in each state. The winner-take-all method of awarding electoral votes is not in the U.S. Constitution. It was not debated at the 1787 Constitutional Convention. It was not mentioned in the Federalist Papers. It was used by only three states in the first presidential election in 1789 (and all three repealed it by 1800). Because of these state winner-take-all laws, presidential candidates ignore states where they are safely ahead or hopelessly behind. In 2012, all of the general-election campaign events (and virtually all campaign expenditures)were concentrated in the 12 states where Romney’s support was between 45% and 51%. Two-thirds of the events were in four states (OH, FL, VA, IA). Thirty-eight states were ignored, including 12 of the 13 smallest states and almost all rural, agricultural, Southern, Western,and Northeastern states. Similarly, in 2016, virtually all campaign events (94%) were in the 12 states where Trump’s support was between 43% and 51%. Two-thirds of the events (273 of 399) were in just 6 states (OH, FL, VA, NC, PA, MI). A similar pattern prevailed in 2000, 2004, 2008, and is expected in 2020. State winner-take-all laws have enabled5of our 45 Presidents to come into office without winning the most popular votes nationwide. The national popular vote winner also would have been defeated by a shift of 59,393 popular votes in Ohio in 2004 (despite President Bush’s nationwide lead of 3 million votes); 9,246 votes in 1976; 77,726 in 1968; 9,212 in 1960; 20,360 in 1948; and 1,711 votes in 1916. The National Popular Vote interstate compact will go into effect when enacted by states with a majority of the presidential electors—that is, 270 of 538. After the compact comes into effect, every voter in all 50 states and DC will acquire a direct vote in the choice of all of the presidential electors from all of the states that enacted the compact. The presidential candidate supported by the most voters in all 50 states and DC will thereby win a majority of the presidential electors in the Electoral College(at least 270), and therefore become President. Under the current state-by-state winner-take-all system, the individual voter influences only the choice of the limited number of presidential electors from their own state. Under National Popular Vote, every voter in all 50 states and DC will have a direct vote in choosing 270 (or more) presidential electors.The National Popular Vote compact would make every person’s vote equal throughout the U.S. It would ensure that every vote, in every state, will matter in every presidential election.The National Popular Vote compact is a state-based approach that retains the power of the states to control how the President is elected, retains state control of elections, and retains the Electoral College. For additional information, see our book Every Vote Equal: A State-Based Plan for Electing the President by National Popular Vote(downloadable for free at www.NationalPopularVote.com). Answers to131myths are atwww.nationalpopularvote.com/answering-myths

Click to expand...

Badfishy1 said:

Don’t tell me how my neighbors voted and the reason for it. You know nothing about the plight of Cuban Americans. Also the polls of higher Hispanic turnout are across the board, not just Miami Cubans. Take your bullshit narrative back to the Biden circle jerk. Also beginning to think this is cannavores sock puppet account. Weird bombastic claims talking total bullshit. Got a mama jones article to back your bullshit up?

Click to expand...

Badfishy1 said:

LEGAL hispanic immigrants make my life easier prove me wrong

Click to expand...

imiubu said:

LOL... pot to kettle... pot to kettle.

Hey folks... as a friendly reminder; the word of the week is...

Sanctimonious.

Click to expand...