Anne_Fetamine
Member
I've been obsessed with this topic for weeks now. Basically, there are a ton of old heads who swear the stuff from the '70s blew today's pot out of the water, which is...hard to believe based on pictures of the stuff. A lot of it resembled literal grass or hay streaked with dog doo. I know looks aren't everything but it was also full of seeds without a trichome anywhere in sight.
Have any of you folks tried smoking the classic 1970s landraces? I'm talking: Columbian Gold, Thai stick, Guerrero, Panama Red, Hawaiian, Malawi Gold, Afghan Kush, Mazar I Sharif, Santa Marta Gold, Kaua'i Electric, Acapulco Gold or any of the other popular strains from the "Golden Years" of pot.
Which is your favorite & why? I notice most are Sativas--were they all anxiety-producing like Green Crack, or were some of them chill & enjoyable? Can you describe the effects & help me explain why someone would think them better than today's strains? This isn't a debate about whether they ARE better or not; I'm just curious as heck about what these strains were like before pot became all about potency & was imported from exotic locations around the world. I don't live in a legal state & thus can't pick any of them up at a dispensary, unfortunately.
That's another thing--do these same strains grown to today's standards have the same groovy feeling as the ones from the olden days? Are there any of the old landraces you frequently choose over the newer strains at a dispensary?
So many questions.
Have any of you folks tried smoking the classic 1970s landraces? I'm talking: Columbian Gold, Thai stick, Guerrero, Panama Red, Hawaiian, Malawi Gold, Afghan Kush, Mazar I Sharif, Santa Marta Gold, Kaua'i Electric, Acapulco Gold or any of the other popular strains from the "Golden Years" of pot.
Which is your favorite & why? I notice most are Sativas--were they all anxiety-producing like Green Crack, or were some of them chill & enjoyable? Can you describe the effects & help me explain why someone would think them better than today's strains? This isn't a debate about whether they ARE better or not; I'm just curious as heck about what these strains were like before pot became all about potency & was imported from exotic locations around the world. I don't live in a legal state & thus can't pick any of them up at a dispensary, unfortunately.
That's another thing--do these same strains grown to today's standards have the same groovy feeling as the ones from the olden days? Are there any of the old landraces you frequently choose over the newer strains at a dispensary?
So many questions.