Register ICMag Forum Menu Features Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read
You are viewing our:
in:
Forums > Marijuana Growing > Cannabis Botany and Advanced Growing Science > Slownickel lounge, pull up a chair. CEC interpretation

Thread Title Search
Thread Closed
Slownickel lounge, pull up a chair. CEC interpretation Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 02-20-2018, 10:59 AM #3951
Arnold.
Member

Arnold.'s Avatar

Join Date: May 2013
Location: 52N
Posts: 96
Arnold. will become famous soon enough
That would be greatly appreciated growingcrazy.
I've been pondering this question a few days now.
I would think that I misinterpret the ppm values of the lab. But then, how can you misinterpret parts per million? It is just 1/1.000.000...

I also thought about multiplying with the molecular weight of the element. But that would make for pretty large numbers.

So I'm clueless
Arnold. is offline


Old 02-20-2018, 12:08 PM #3952
h.h.
Senior Member

h.h.'s Avatar

Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: desert
Posts: 2,008
h.h. is a glorious beacon of lighth.h. is a glorious beacon of lighth.h. is a glorious beacon of lighth.h. is a glorious beacon of lighth.h. is a glorious beacon of lighth.h. is a glorious beacon of lighth.h. is a glorious beacon of lighth.h. is a glorious beacon of lighth.h. is a glorious beacon of lighth.h. is a glorious beacon of lighth.h. is a glorious beacon of light
Quote:
Originally Posted by Arnold. View Post
Guys,

Could you look at my reasoning here beneath?
My calculations says I need to use only this little gypsum to the potting soil. But I’m doubtful if I can trust them.

View Image

I tried to calculate how many gypsum (and TSP) I would need to add to my potting soil which I got tested. These calculations says to use about 17g of gypsum on 5 gallons of potting soil. This seems a lot less than I would have imagined after reading this thread
I’ve seen Slow mentioning 300g of gypsum for 7 gal. Or 1 cup for 5gal.

My reasoning (with fault??):
I want to add 1845ppm of Ca to this potting soil. With gypsum being 22% of Ca in weight I have to add 8380ppm of gypsum.
Since the K3 procedure measures ppm in weight. This means I have to add 0.008380g of gypsum for each g of dried and sieved soil (just like the sample I sent in).
Then I weighed a sample volume of soil, oven dried and sieved it before weighing again. This way I could calculate the conversion factor from the dry, sifted soil to the wetter soil straight out the bag.
5 gallons of soil would weigh 2kg, thus needing 16.7g of gypsum.

Am I overthinking this and does this soil indeed only needs a dust of gypsum?

View Image

Follow the recommendations that come with your test. Don't get confused by this thread.
__________________


Quote:
it’s mighty sad when average health has declined to the point that people become fatally ill from exposure to a little animal shit.
Solomon, Steve; Reinheimer, Erica (2012-12-04). The Intelligent Gardener: Growing Nutrient Dense Food (p. 271). New Society Publishers. Kindle Edition.
h.h. is online now


2 members found this post helpful.
Old 02-20-2018, 03:54 PM #3953
led05
Member

Join Date: May 2015
Location: Upstate - Northeast
Posts: 632
led05 is just really niceled05 is just really niceled05 is just really niceled05 is just really niceled05 is just really niceled05 is just really niceled05 is just really niceled05 is just really nice
Quote:
Originally Posted by paradoxlost View Post
So the way the CEC test works is this:

You flood the CEC sites with NH4+. Than you take a solution with a known concentration of K+ with a volume greater than the volume of the soil porosity. Than you flood the soil with a solvent and measure the concentration of K+ that were held on cation exchange sites. This concentration will tell you the amount of cations held per unit volume of soil.

This is the basic jist of the ammonia CEC determination. Obviously there is a little more too it, it's been a while since I have done this technique.

The limitations of this are with alkaline soils and saline soils, as salts will start to form ionic bonds which have the same effect as CEC, but are technically not part of CEC. Maybe the spectroscopy technique might have an accuracy issue. If you're running Atomic Adsorption Spectroscopy, versus something like an Induced Couple Plasma.

Idk what spectrum does btw as far as spectroscopy. But probably Atomic Adsorption. That is the most cost effective, and accurate enough for agriculture's purpose.
Thanks for reply, I do understand how the test works. My point was more about the quality of the people & processes along the way. How you take that soil sample, where, how many spots, how it's sifted, mixed and so on. The person in the lab, how detailed are they, how detailed is the labs process, how much pride do the people take in their jobs doing that work etc etc etc... Samples are also taken at a point in time - I was more trying to say it's has endless limitations but also offers invaluable detail.

My native around here in spots is > 12% OM, 40% is certainly a lot for OM but not unheard of.

reading this thread it just feels at times that some think their going to become a great farmer if only they get that perfect soil test result - I can't stress how wrong this is and IMO, leads many down the wrong rabbit hole...

Understanding is King, test results are simply one piece to that puzzle
__________________
Pleasure for One hour; a bottle of wine.
Pleasure for one year, a marriage; but pleasure for a lifetime, a Garden - Chinese Proverb
led05 is offline


2 members found this post helpful.
Old 02-20-2018, 07:12 PM #3954
paradoxlost
Member

Join Date: Jan 2017
Posts: 352
paradoxlost has a spectacular aura aboutparadoxlost has a spectacular aura aboutparadoxlost has a spectacular aura aboutparadoxlost has a spectacular aura aboutparadoxlost has a spectacular aura about
Quote:
Originally Posted by led05 View Post
Thanks for reply, I do understand how the test works. My point was more about the quality of the people & processes along the way. How you take that soil sample, where, how many spots, how it's sifted, mixed and so on. The person in the lab, how detailed are they, how detailed is the labs process, how much pride do the people take in their jobs doing that work etc etc etc... Samples are also taken at a point in time - I was more trying to say it's has endless limitations but also offers invaluable detail.

My native around here in spots is > 12% OM, 40% is certainly a lot for OM but not unheard of.

reading this thread it just feels at times that some think their going to become a great farmer if only they get that perfect soil test result - I can't stress how wrong this is and IMO, leads many down the wrong rabbit hole...

Understanding is King, test results are simply one piece to that puzzle
Having a thick O horizon doesn't count towards the consideration of total OM for a soil. Obviously this is a point of contention with some taxonimists, but the general idea is pedogenesis is not occuring, simply decomposition. A soil pedon is to bedrock, and I can assure you those 40% soils you're testing is probably only accurate to the Ap horizon than in the B (or E, if your soil is leeched) it drops down below 1%. The C horizon most assuredly does not have above 12% OM, unless you are in a bog or swamp.

To determine if it's a histosol (or mollisol) you gotta take samples from each horizon than average it. That's how that works for taxonomy. Trust me you're not getting native soil 40% OM unless you're in an alpine situation or a peat bog.

But yeah you gotta clean the instruments before use. But normally soils people are weirdly obsessed with soil.
paradoxlost is offline


Old 02-20-2018, 08:02 PM #3955
jidoka
Senior Member

Join Date: Jul 2016
Posts: 1,491
jidoka is a glorious beacon of lightjidoka is a glorious beacon of lightjidoka is a glorious beacon of lightjidoka is a glorious beacon of lightjidoka is a glorious beacon of lightjidoka is a glorious beacon of lightjidoka is a glorious beacon of lightjidoka is a glorious beacon of lightjidoka is a glorious beacon of lightjidoka is a glorious beacon of lightjidoka is a glorious beacon of light
Here is an example. I checked Nectar for the Gods #4 soil with a Logan test. The ingredients are Sphagnum peat moss, perlite, coir fiber, pumice, mycorrhizal fungi, yucca meal, kelp meal, bone meal, diatomaceous earth, clay, basalt, oyster shell (for pH adjustment), humus and lime (for pH adjustment).

In a video I watched they claimed 2 lbs of bone meal in a 1.5 cubic ft bag or the equivalent of 36 lbs per yard (if you recall that Tom Hill mix he used 33)

tcec 15.49
media weight 27.48 (% of a 2,000,000 lb per acre field soil)
pH 6.8
organic material 28,47
sulfur 14 ppm
m3 P2O5 466 ppm
Ca 2480 ppm or 80.06%
Mg 133 or 7.16%
K 175 or 2.9%
Na 81 or 3%
and a lot of Fe but pretty much no other micros

And the truth is you are gonna have to feed this probably before veg ends for an outdoor grow. And you can bet your ass you need gypsum in this even though it is at 80%

With field soil weight if you hit 250 lbs on Mg and K my experience is you don't have to feed either one of those to get biggish plants

It just does not all add up (at least in my brain) with these low weight, high organic soils

My thinking is this...you would need 4 acres of this stuff to get 133 lbs of Mg (weight is basically 1/4 field soil). Then basically double that to get to 250 lbs needed to grow the crop

in other words I would need 8 yds of this vs 1 yard of heavy soil to grow the same weight of crop. Or I would need to feed a fuckton of nutes to the light soil

And then you could start factoring in oxygen in the root zone...big advantage to light mix. So maybe not 8.

Whole lot more to it than the numbers.

You can see how Slow's plan works though. Especially if you maintain proper ratios in your feed, including micros
__________________
The salt shaker
jidoka is offline


8 members found this post helpful.
Old 02-20-2018, 09:21 PM #3956
paradoxlost
Member

Join Date: Jan 2017
Posts: 352
paradoxlost has a spectacular aura aboutparadoxlost has a spectacular aura aboutparadoxlost has a spectacular aura aboutparadoxlost has a spectacular aura aboutparadoxlost has a spectacular aura about
Hmm I kinda see where your confusion is at...

Maybe a ratio of CEC vs porosity would be a good metric to look at.

Also oxygen levels play a huge role as well. EC is a function not of nutrient levels buy oxidative state of the ions in solution. In a light mix more of the Mg is in an ionic form, or complexed with chelators. In natural soils a lot of times they get tied up in a mineral portion.

I don't know the answer to the problem specifically just spiralling ideas
paradoxlost is offline


4 members found this post helpful.
Old 02-20-2018, 11:06 PM #3957
jidoka
Senior Member

Join Date: Jul 2016
Posts: 1,491
jidoka is a glorious beacon of lightjidoka is a glorious beacon of lightjidoka is a glorious beacon of lightjidoka is a glorious beacon of lightjidoka is a glorious beacon of lightjidoka is a glorious beacon of lightjidoka is a glorious beacon of lightjidoka is a glorious beacon of lightjidoka is a glorious beacon of lightjidoka is a glorious beacon of lightjidoka is a glorious beacon of light
That 36 lbs/yd is the equivalent of 29,000 lbs per acre. That ain’t a recommendation you are gonna see everyday in farming
__________________
The salt shaker
jidoka is offline


1 members found this post helpful.
Old 02-21-2018, 12:26 AM #3958
led05
Member

Join Date: May 2015
Location: Upstate - Northeast
Posts: 632
led05 is just really niceled05 is just really niceled05 is just really niceled05 is just really niceled05 is just really niceled05 is just really niceled05 is just really niceled05 is just really nice
Quote:
Originally Posted by paradoxlost View Post
Having a thick O horizon doesn't count towards the consideration of total OM for a soil. Obviously this is a point of contention with some taxonimists, but the general idea is pedogenesis is not occuring, simply decomposition. A soil pedon is to bedrock, and I can assure you those 40% soils you're testing is probably only accurate to the Ap horizon than in the B (or E, if your soil is leeched) it drops down below 1%. The C horizon most assuredly does not have above 12% OM, unless you are in a bog or swamp.

To determine if it's a histosol (or mollisol) you gotta take samples from each horizon than average it. That's how that works for taxonomy. Trust me you're not getting native soil 40% OM unless you're in an alpine situation or a peat bog.

But yeah you gotta clean the instruments before use. But normally soils people are weirdly obsessed with soil.
the 12% was some native around here, very much real, same rates that Fed studies show around these parts via Geo surveys etc... 40% was OM % for medium people make up which is what I believe you originally mentioned, I simply referenced some native areas around here which have a lot of OM for native soils IME, I didn't mean to say it was >40% OM in native. I'm sure there are spots with that much OM though, there just not being farmed for good reason(s).

40% OM native, agreed, bog... lots of clays and bogs around these parts though, where you at isn't everywhere, > 12% OM is by no means unusual in many places around these great lakes
__________________
Pleasure for One hour; a bottle of wine.
Pleasure for one year, a marriage; but pleasure for a lifetime, a Garden - Chinese Proverb
led05 is offline


Old 02-21-2018, 12:45 AM #3959
led05
Member

Join Date: May 2015
Location: Upstate - Northeast
Posts: 632
led05 is just really niceled05 is just really niceled05 is just really niceled05 is just really niceled05 is just really niceled05 is just really niceled05 is just really niceled05 is just really nice
Quote:
Originally Posted by paradoxlost View Post
Hmm I kinda see where your confusion is at...

Maybe a ratio of CEC vs porosity would be a good metric to look at.

Also oxygen levels play a huge role as well. EC is a function not of nutrient levels buy oxidative state of the ions in solution. In a light mix more of the Mg is in an ionic form, or complexed with chelators. In natural soils a lot of times they get tied up in a mineral portion.

I don't know the answer to the problem specifically just spiralling ideas
The answer is......... ALL tests have their limitations, period

I mixed some indoor medium early today for more spring starts, it's great on the arms, feels nice, almost like stretching...

Then I went outside and dug in native (lots of clay, OM & currently, h20) about 100' long by 1' wide and 8-10" deep trench to put some stone in to aid in drainage. That wasn't like stretching at all, my back and neck hurt now :(

The point, unless you think somehow the "test" accounts perfectly for the hugely different "dirt" I was playing with all day, well we all know the answer......

Jidokas intuitions are spot on and so is paradoxlosts science - both are right
__________________
Pleasure for One hour; a bottle of wine.
Pleasure for one year, a marriage; but pleasure for a lifetime, a Garden - Chinese Proverb
led05 is offline


Old 02-21-2018, 03:58 AM #3960
WMICoastal
Newbie

Join Date: Feb 2016
Posts: 32
WMICoastal will become famous soon enough
so funny organic buds is still here getting made a fool of. some things never change lmao.
WMICoastal is offline


Thread Closed

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off


All times are GMT +2. The time now is 02:30 AM.




This site is for educational and entertainment purposes only.
You must be of legal age to view ICmag and participate here.
All postings are the responsibility of their authors.
Powered by: vBulletin Copyright ©2000 - 2018, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.