What's new
  • Please note members who been with us for more than 10 years have been upgraded to "Veteran" status and will receive exclusive benefits. If you wish to find out more about this or support IcMag and get same benefits, check this thread here.
  • Important notice: ICMag's T.O.U. has been updated. Please review it here. For your convenience, it is also available in the main forum menu, under 'Quick Links"!

Jeff Sessions has Anti Legalization Meeting

rolandomota

Well-known member
j sessions is fantasizing about locking up all the evil potheads Because good people dont smoke marijuana.
 

mushroombrew

Active member
Veteran
He got lots of campaign money from private prisons.

But I am sure that's totally unrelated to him wanting to lock people up(extreme sarcasm)
 

Gypsy Nirvana

Recalcitrant Reprobate -
Administrator
Veteran
U.S. Attorney General Jeff Sessions held a meeting on Friday to discuss marijuana and drug policy with a group of activists working to defeat legalization efforts.

“I think it’s a big issue for America, for the country, and I’m of the general view that this is not a healthy substance,” Sessions said at the beginning of the gathering. “I think that’s pretty clear. And then have the policy response that we and the federal government needs to be prepared to take and do so appropriately and with good sense.”

In attendance, according to video of the opening introductions captured by a pool photographer and posted by C-SPAN, were:

Edwin Meese III, U.S. attorney general under the Reagan administration
Kevin Sabet, president and CEO of Smart Approaches to Marijuana
Bertha Madras, a former Office of National Drug Control Policy staffer and a member of President Trump’s Commission on Combating Drug Addiction and the Opioid Crisis
Robert DuPont, former director of the National Institute on Drug Abuse
David Evans, executive director of the Drug Free Schools Coalition

All are longtime opponents of legalizing marijuana.

“I appreciate the opportunity to hear your analysis on marijuana and some of the related issues,” Sessions told the group. “I do believe, and I’m afraid, that the public is not properly educated on some of the issues related to marijuana. And that would be a matter that we could, all of us together, maybe be helpful in working on and that would allow better policy to actually be enacted.”

It is not clear if Sessions has taken the time to meet with any pro-legalization advocates since being confirmed as attorney general in February.

Also attending the Friday meeting was an official from Johns Hopkins Hospital and a Heritage Foundation intern, along with a handful of others who could not immediately be identified.

A screen shot of a meeting agenda that Sessions was carrying upon entering the room appeared to show that one topic of discussion was, “The effect of marijuana on drugged driving.”

The group’s roundtable discussion itself was closed to the press.

The gathering comes as the Justice Department’s overall position on marijuana policy remains uncertain. Sessions has in recent weeks sent mixed signals about his plans for federal marijuana enforcement under the Trump administration.

Last month, he testified before Congress that an Obama-era Justice Department memo that generally allows states to implement their own marijuana laws without interference remains in effect. But last week he told reporters at a briefing that his department is actively conducting talks about potential changes to the policy.

This is a developing story and may be updated.


*The link is in the first post of this thread.
 

mushroombrew

Active member
Veteran
What do you think Gypsy. Is Federal enforcement possible? I don't know if they have enough resources. But huge revenues would be gleaned from raids. So they would pay for themselves?

The US is less and less attractive to me. Might be time to get back to Europe where you at least know where you stand.

Here you have:-

Federal Law
State Law
County Law
City Law

And a county can decide at any time to change laws and put you out of business.
https://kobi5.com/news/new-cannabis-ordinance-josephine-county-66762/
 
"Sessions told the group. “I do believe, and I’m afraid, that the public is not properly educated on some of the issues related to marijuana."

properly educated aka brainwashed into believing their horseshit lies.
 

Gypsy Nirvana

Recalcitrant Reprobate -
Administrator
Veteran
What do you think Gypsy. Is Federal enforcement possible? I don't know if they have enough resources. But huge revenues would be gleaned from raids. So they would pay for themselves?

The US is less and less attractive to me. Might be time to get back to Europe where you at least know where you stand.

Here you have:-

Federal Law
State Law
County Law
City Law

And a county can decide at any time to change laws and put you out of business.
https://kobi5.com/news/new-cannabis-ordinance-josephine-county-66762/

Quite honestly, I wouldn't dismiss federal enforcement over state laws on cannabis beyond the capabilities of the current US administration, it is a very clear and present danger that they could enact federal schedule one narcotics laws on anyone, as they have been trying to do on me for the past 4-5 years, but so far unsuccessfully and I am not even a US citizen living in the USA!

You are correct in stating that US laws are VERY confusing and complicated with some federal, state, county, and city laws constantly contradicting each other, but you must keep in mind that federal law SUPERCEDES any of the others, and there is the problem.
 

944s2

Well-known member
ICMag Donor
Veteran
I think the " Horse has bolted the stable",,its too late,,far too much tax dollars and
powerful people have so much $$$$ invested that Sessions will need to tread very carefully,,,,this meeting doesnt seem to mean anything,,opinions like ass----- and all that,,,,,,,,,s2
 

stoney917

i Am SoFaKiNg WeTod DiD
Veteran
I hope he brings it back 10 yrs takes the legalization out n prosecutes these rich fucks the way they did us all the yrs.., FUK LEGAL WEED, FUK LEGAL GROWS , FUK EVERYONE WHO THOUGHT THIS WAS A GOOD IDEA... YALL GOT WHAT YA WANTED... HOPEFULLY THEY CAN BACK TRACK BUT IMO ITS WAY TO LATE... THE BEST WE CAN HOPE FOR IS OTHER COUNTRIES LEARN N DONT VOTE YES....
 

Emperortaima

Namekian resident/farmer
He can do what he wants with legalization let's get together and light a fire under his ass with a decriminalization movement and succeed it that'll have him burying himself alive as he should be right now that damn pos sessions
 

Gypsy Nirvana

Recalcitrant Reprobate -
Administrator
Veteran
Jeff Sessions Wants to Crack Down on Legal Weed -- Will Congress Let Him?
Friday, December 08, 2017
By Amanda Marcotte,
.
UPDATE: Congress gave the Rohrabacher-Blumenauer amendment a temporary reprieve after this piece was originally published, extending protections until Dec. 22. Rep. Earl Blumenauer, D-OR, responded by saying, "Two weeks is not enough certainty," and adding, "Congress must act to put an end to the cycle of uncertainty and permanently protect state medical marijuana programs -- and adult use -- from federal interference."


In all the budget and tax negotiations frantically being hammered out on Capitol Hill, one small amendment that might get lost in the shuffle could have huge ramifications. The Rohrabacher-Blumenauer amendment was originally set to expire on Friday (see update above), which would open the door for Attorney General Jeff Sessions to do what he's been hinting he wants to: Launch a federal war on states that have partly or completely legalized marijuana use.

The Rohrabacher-Blumenauer amendment, originally passed as the the Rohrabacher-Farr amendment in 2014, bars the Department of Justice from using federal funds to prosecute people buying or selling medical marijuana in states that have legalized it. It's a popular bipartisan amendment that protects 46 states, but there have been concerns about whether it will be renewed after Sessions exerted pressure in May on Congress to let the amendment die.

Sessions argued that the DOJ's hands need to be untied when it comes to prosecuting marijuana dispensaries, "particularly in the midst of an historic drug epidemic and potentially long-term uptick in violent crime." There is, of course, no evidence that marijuana use is contributing to the opioid crisis and, in fact, there's a significant link between legalized medical marijuana and a decrease in opioid overdoses.

The amendment survived, despite Sessions' pressure, through a couple rounds of budget debate in Congress this year, but as Ames Grawert of the Brennan Center for Justice told Salon, "Every time, there’s sort of a dance around whether it will actually get cut this time or not." It’s reasonable to be at least "a little concerned," Grawert said, that Sessions' pressure will eventually convince congressional Republicans to dump the amendment.

This will-they-or-won't-they game is why Rep. Dana Rohrabacher, a California Republican, and a bipartisan group of 24 other lawmakers have introduced the Respect State Marijuana Laws Act of 2017, which would prevent the federal government from prosecuting any marijuana users, growers or distributors who are in compliance with state laws.

“You have booming economies in several states, some of whom allow the recreational use of marijuana but many also just for medical purposes, and no real data linking that to a public safety problem," Grawert said, noting that the Brennan Center objects to using federal resources to prosecute people or break up thriving economies without any data to show that doing so would improve public safety.

In March, Sessions argued that marijuana use is "only slightly less awful" than heroin addiction, making it clear that his priority was to aggressively prosecute marijuana users and distributors. He's been stymied by both the Rohrabacher-Blumenauer amendment and a memo issued by then-Deputy Attorney General James Cole that discouraged the Justice Department from prosecuting people who were following state-level marijuana laws. The obvious concern here, however, is that Sessions would seize upon the first political opening available to reinvigorate the federal war on pot.

As Sadie Gurman of the AP reported in August, Sessions tried to create such an opportunity by convening a Task Force on Crime Reduction and Public Safety that he reportedly expected would give him legal cover to reverse the Cole memo. Instead, as Gurman reports, they came up "with no new policy recommendations to advance the attorney general's aggressively anti-marijuana views."

Sessions clearly hasn't given up hope of creating a pretense for a crackdown on legal weed, however. As BuzzFeed's Dominic Holden reported on Twitter, Sessions is holding a roundtable discussion on drug policy at the hyper-conservative Heritage Foundation. No press will be allowed to ask questions. Heritage has been aggressively fighting back against the bipartisan efforts to relax marijuana laws, falsely claiming that pot is more addictive and dangerous than alcohol. In fact, the opposite is true: Marijuana is less addictive than booze and significantly less dangerous.

In November, Sessions was hauled in front of the House Judiciary Committee to answer questions about the Donald Trump-Russia scandal, but as is typical with these sorts of hearings, a lot of congressmen wedged in to ask some off-topic questions. Rep. Steve Chabot, a Republican from Ohio, asked Sessions about the DOJ's marijuana policies.

"Our policy is the same, really, fundamentally as the Holder-Lynch policy, which is that the federal law remains in effect and a state can legalize marijuana for its law enforcement purposes but it still remains illegal with regard to federal purposes," Sessions said.

If that sounds comforting, it shouldn't. The DOJ approach to marijuana under the Obama administration was all over the place. On one hand, the Cole memo helped dial back federal prosecutions of marijuana. On the other, Justice under Attorney General Eric Holder did what it could to ignore the Rohrabacher-Farr amendment, prosecuting marijuana dispensaries in at least one prominent case that was overturned in court. The fact of the matter is Obama's administration was pretty bad for a long time on marijuana, a fact that Sessions is now eager to use as political cover to do more of the same.

Ultimately, the legal limbo around this question has to end. There's already a surprising amount of bipartisan support for medical marijuana in Congress. A recent CBS poll shows that 61 percent of Americans believe recreational marijuana should be legal, while 88 percent support legalized medical marijuana. Seven out of 10 Americans believe the federal government should not interfere with marijuana sales in states where it's legal. Ideally, Congress should simply pass a bill removing marijuana from the controlled substances list. In lieu of that, a bill compelling the Department of Justice to respect state marijuana laws will finally clarify the murky legal status of people who sell or use pot in states where getting high is not a crime.

This piece was reprinted by Truthout with permission or license. It may not be reproduced in any form without permission or license from the source.
AMANDA MARCOTTE

http://www.truth-out.org/news/item/...rack-down-on-legal-weed-will-congress-let-him

*Cuz Dave posted this link earlier in this thread.... THANKS CUZ!
 

Gry

Well-known member
Deck stacking and politics ...
Can recall nixon buying imperial guard uniforms for the white house.
 

Green Squall

Active member
At the beginning I was worried about Session's, but watching the first year of this administration, it's doubtful he will be able to do any irreparable harm. Cats out of the bag and most polls Ive read say that over 50% of Americans think pot should be legal. I won't be surprised when Session's "resigns" and I doubt Trump will even finish his term.
 
M

moose eater

The Fed's method for recruiting foot-soldiers sufficient in # to carry forth their War On (*Some) Drugs has, for a LONG time, been via mandates, followed by memorandums of agreement with lesser governments (state and local), with lots of federal grant dollars/blood money offered to the states and localities who will accept the official bribes.

And once they're sucking down the federal $, and their budgets are bolstered, they can't even remember what the 9th and 10th Amendments were about.

The nature of quasi-mercenary politics.

Fuck Sessions and the red-neck, aggressively evangelical tent he rode in under. He's a dinosaur that didn't notice or take heed when the majority of his ilk drowned in the tar sands a kazillion years ago.

I wish him a painful demise, following an abrupt and thorough re-education. :peacock:
 

Emperortaima

Namekian resident/farmer
At the beginning I was worried about Session's, but watching the first year of this administration, it's doubtful he will be able to do any irreparable harm. Cats out of the bag and most polls Ive read say that over 50% of Americans think pot should be legal. I won't be surprised when Session's "resigns" and I doubt Trump will even finish his term.

I pray to mother universe that you are right brother
 

mushroombrew

Active member
Veteran
Sessions has his own agenda. And it ignores the peoples wishes. Trump is doing zero to reign Sessions in. How could he. Zero political knowledge.

Do you think a man who calls a propaganda meeting like this is backing down? Seems like ramping up to me.

I think he is just waiting for CA. Snoop, Khalifa etc. Rich, Black weed business owners?

Haha Jeff must be boiling!

Congress can prevent medical raids. But unless they de-schedule it the DOJ has cart blanche with Rec.
 
I’m so tired of even looking at this fuckin dude on tv. I can’t stand him and his whole way of thinking...90% of that generations thinking. It’s been legal in enough states for long enough now to see the data of what’s really going on. Facts don’t lie and they’re plain and simple, right out in the open for anyone to see. Cannabis isn’t close to as dangerous as alcohol, and especially fuckin heroin. That comment from that little fucker pissed me off so bad. I know plenty of people that have kicked the opies with the help of bud. I’m one of them. Would still be a full blown junkie to this day if I didn’t have cannabis...lots and lots of dabs through that whole withdraw period...but it saved my life. Hey Sessions...the country is tired of your fuckin methadone bro.
 
Top