Register ICMag Forum Menu Features Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read
You are viewing our:
in:
Forums > Talk About It! > Hemp > McConnell will ease up on HEMP

Thread Title Search
Post Reply
McConnell will ease up on HEMP Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 03-26-2018, 08:41 PM #1
BOMBAYCAT
Senior Member

BOMBAYCAT's Avatar

Join Date: Feb 2010
Posts: 1,025
BOMBAYCAT is a glorious beacon of lightBOMBAYCAT is a glorious beacon of lightBOMBAYCAT is a glorious beacon of lightBOMBAYCAT is a glorious beacon of lightBOMBAYCAT is a glorious beacon of lightBOMBAYCAT is a glorious beacon of lightBOMBAYCAT is a glorious beacon of lightBOMBAYCAT is a glorious beacon of lightBOMBAYCAT is a glorious beacon of lightBOMBAYCAT is a glorious beacon of lightBOMBAYCAT is a glorious beacon of light
McConnell will ease up on HEMP

Politico.com
Mitch McConnell will introduce a bill to allow states to regulate their HEMP industries.

Go figure? Cannabis is essentially the same thing. So introduce a bill to allow states to regulate their own Cannabis industries.
BOMBAYCAT is offline Quote


Old 03-27-2018, 03:13 AM #2
PDX Dopesmoker
Senior Member

PDX Dopesmoker's Avatar

Join Date: Feb 2016
Location: In Portland, next to the pipe
Posts: 1,359
PDX Dopesmoker has much to be proud ofPDX Dopesmoker has much to be proud ofPDX Dopesmoker has much to be proud ofPDX Dopesmoker has much to be proud ofPDX Dopesmoker has much to be proud ofPDX Dopesmoker has much to be proud ofPDX Dopesmoker has much to be proud ofPDX Dopesmoker has much to be proud ofPDX Dopesmoker has much to be proud ofPDX Dopesmoker has much to be proud ofPDX Dopesmoker has much to be proud of
Here is a link to last year's hemp bill https://www.congress.gov/bill/115th-...bill/3530/text
They're saying this year's is similar, they're also saying maybe it's all just for show because this is an election year. Anyway last year's had this language in it
Quote:
Section 102 of the Controlled Substances Act (21 U.S.C. 802) is amended—

(1) in paragraph (16)—

(A) by striking “(16) The” and inserting “(16)(A) The”; and

(B) by adding at the end the following:


“(B) The term ‘marihuana’ does not include industrial hemp or research hemp.”; and

(2) by adding at the end the following:

“(57) The term ‘industrial hemp’ means the plant Cannabis sativa L. and any part or derivative of such plant (including viable seeds), whether growing or not—

“(A) no part of which has a delta-9 tetrahydrocannabinol concentration of more than 0.3 percent on a dry weight basis;
and that sounds relatively friendly, might even allow the possibility of high thc "research hemp", but last years bill didn't move much and there not much has changed since then. Maybe it was something the genuinely wanted to change last year and just didn't get around to it, seems doubtful.
PDX Dopesmoker is offline Quote


Post Reply

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off


All times are GMT +2. The time now is 07:27 AM.




This site is for educational and entertainment purposes only.
You must be of legal age to view ICmag and participate here.
All postings are the responsibility of their authors.
Powered by: vBulletin Copyright ©2000 - 2018, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.