Mr Celsius said:????
80% load is optimal, right? I'm sure we agree.
Magnetic 1000's take 4.9 amps
Digi 1000's take 4.1 amps
80% of 30 is 24 amps, IE 5 magnetics or 6 digis... not 4, either way.
Mr Celsius said:Scrog... well thats just dumb on a commercial scale, simply because the work vs profit sucks. Do a SOG. Not saying its not doable, just saying its pointless and time wasting.
00420 said:your right my bad........ 5
the reason i dont do more then 4 is i run a 110 off each line to run my pump's & fan's
Mr Celsius said:or just put the screen up and let them grow into it? \
Mr Celsius said:I
For light movers, Look at Stoney's SOG grow, where he pulls 4lbs off of each 4x8 with only 2 - 600's on light movers.
outlawed420 said:Its "you're" not your.
An educated opinion is seemingly impossible to find on the forums these days. There are actually a few people who know what they're talking about, you're not one of them though. Please, do yourself a favor and get your G.E.D and go to college!
Considering you're a full time daddy, you should actually make an effort to support your child in a responsible manner and set a good example.
Mr Celsius said:Without those lightmovers, his yields would not be possible.
ogatec said:pico-very much respect! i would love to see a thread dedicated to your training techniques.
I agree his yields may be a tad higher with three 600's (not on a mover), but the question u gotta ask is, IS IT ENOUGH TO ACTUALLY SPEND THE MONEY AND USE THE EXESS ELECTRIC FOR THAT LITTLE BIT MORE? Heres my theory... Plants photon receptors catch the light and then take it to be synthesized. But while they are busy, that specific spot (very small) on the plant cant use the photons(very small amt. of time, but still) that are falling onto the surface, and if you have stationary lights, then the same spots on the plants are always being fed the light, therefore, some areas of the plant never recieve the intense light that they need while the other parts have so much that some is getting wasted. If you use movers, then a lot more of the plant is being subjected to higher intensities of light than it would get from a stationary setup. So intstead of beaming light down on the same area all the time (and shedding photons that wont get used by receptors while they carry out their duty), it would seem that if you used a mover and lit up all areas of the plant, that the photons would be more usable. So IMO i think three 600's (not on a mover) would yield more, but it would not be significant enough to go get an extra hood,bulb,ballast and and then deal with the added heat and elctricity consumption. If he can pull 4lbs from 2 600's on a mover, then i would only imagine that if he took down the mover and added and extra light, then his yield would only increase by somewhere around a pound which would reduce his original 2lb per light average when using a mover.ogatec said:i dont really think you can make that assumption, i bet his yields would be even better with 3 lights per table. i know for a fact his buds would be of a higher quality with a greater watt/sqft.(less popcorn, denser fatter nuggs)
solid advice my fine friend.REZDOG said:Or, you can set up,on independent circuits,220v multi-light relay boxes on independent timers.
When you use those,you can run flip,or any time you like,safely.
I always try to run lights at night,it's always cooler and more efficient that way,I've found.
The boxes run about $225USD each,and have to be hardwired in by a pro. They're made by Green Air and many others,I've used them for years and had a box of them converted for use where I'm now based.
They're very safe,but impossible to uninstall in any hurry,take note.
My .02