HG23
Member
It looks like the Trommel is setup as a WFE and not a molecular still because of the external main condenser.
I have been lead to believe that the path in this type of system is long enough to allow molecular collisions that would hamper the system's ability to reach true high vacuum (.001 torr) that in turn allows distillation at the lowest possible temps. WFE's have been suggested to me as replacements for stripping ethanol but not for distilling cannabis oil. That advice was, however, coming from a still manufacturing company so it was taken with a grain of salt as molecular still equipment is more expensive.
GW the Trommel runs at 200C, right? It seems like you took the specs from your research with the Kuge and worked off those for the Trommel.
Breakover, I'm confused, why do you run your Pope at 100mtorr? Your listed temp of 132C is nice and low, but shouldn't the vacuum reading be closer to the high vacuum range of 1mtorr or less? I got some quotes from Pope and it looks like they only supply a sliding vane Edwards with the still (medium vacuum range), no diffusion booster. Did you happen to question them on that? I'm suspecting maybe it's not necassary.
I have also been lead to believe that the molecular stills can be run at parameters to collect a clear, useful terpene fraction that is not an automatic throw away given the right starting material. Does the fact that the Trommel is a WFE setup hamper its ability to run at a low enough temperature to not thermally degrade the terpene fraction?
Honestly, collecting the terpene fraction isn't important to me. The oil I would use to feed the still isn't highly pleasant. But if that's the only difference between the capabilities of a WFE and a molecular still the decision of which system to go with will be easy.
I have been lead to believe that the path in this type of system is long enough to allow molecular collisions that would hamper the system's ability to reach true high vacuum (.001 torr) that in turn allows distillation at the lowest possible temps. WFE's have been suggested to me as replacements for stripping ethanol but not for distilling cannabis oil. That advice was, however, coming from a still manufacturing company so it was taken with a grain of salt as molecular still equipment is more expensive.
GW the Trommel runs at 200C, right? It seems like you took the specs from your research with the Kuge and worked off those for the Trommel.
Breakover, I'm confused, why do you run your Pope at 100mtorr? Your listed temp of 132C is nice and low, but shouldn't the vacuum reading be closer to the high vacuum range of 1mtorr or less? I got some quotes from Pope and it looks like they only supply a sliding vane Edwards with the still (medium vacuum range), no diffusion booster. Did you happen to question them on that? I'm suspecting maybe it's not necassary.
I have also been lead to believe that the molecular stills can be run at parameters to collect a clear, useful terpene fraction that is not an automatic throw away given the right starting material. Does the fact that the Trommel is a WFE setup hamper its ability to run at a low enough temperature to not thermally degrade the terpene fraction?
Honestly, collecting the terpene fraction isn't important to me. The oil I would use to feed the still isn't highly pleasant. But if that's the only difference between the capabilities of a WFE and a molecular still the decision of which system to go with will be easy.