Could the "males" just be individuals showing the same severe intersexual traits as the mom?
In my opinion there are no males from feminised seeds
In my opinion there are no males from feminised seeds
-
Happy Birthday ICMag! Been 20 years since Gypsy Nirvana created the forum! We are celebrating with a 4/20 Giveaway and by launching a new Patreon tier called "420club". You can read more here.
-
Important notice: ICMag's T.O.U. has been updated. Please review it here. For your convenience, it is also available in the main forum menu, under 'Quick Links"!
Mack's Chem Project.
- Thread starter mack 10
- Start date
crazyfool*
Member
nice one Mack..... I´m looking forward to see what you´ll get!
@ Backyard Farmer, possible.
Technically the male (from a selfed female) is not male at all but a female that show's male traits. What I find interesting is that the seeds that are produced can often be a male and female population but if tested they should have no Y (male) gene?
Should future generations be clearly labelled as such?
and how are other breeders labelling them?
@ Crazyfool* Thanks man
Technically the male (from a selfed female) is not male at all but a female that show's male traits. What I find interesting is that the seeds that are produced can often be a male and female population but if tested they should have no Y (male) gene?
Should future generations be clearly labelled as such?
and how are other breeders labelling them?
@ Crazyfool* Thanks man
At a certain point, it fails to matter the scholarly particulars if the plants being produced are fire to smoke on, imo.
In theory - there should be no "Y" present, correct...even in the future filial generations.
I've been reading and studying; trying to understand the complexity of this happening since the first seeds produce by this "male" showed "m" / f offspring...
I really wish I could afford to have it tested out. I do know that Medicinal Genomics is capable (and willing) of doing such tests.
dank.Frank
In theory - there should be no "Y" present, correct...even in the future filial generations.
I've been reading and studying; trying to understand the complexity of this happening since the first seeds produce by this "male" showed "m" / f offspring...
I really wish I could afford to have it tested out. I do know that Medicinal Genomics is capable (and willing) of doing such tests.
dank.Frank
I'm riding with ya Mack!! Good luck! !!!
Heard of it a few times in situations like this where the she/he actually throws off M/F progeny. Def weird, but does happen.
But are they real Ms or severe intersex ? I'm really curious because if they're real males I'd look through some chem s1
I don't know why there's a thumbs down at the top of the post...
I don't know why there's a thumbs down at the top of the post...
This entire topic has already been discussed pretty in depth in a different Chem '91 thread...
The conclusion there, was that they are likely 100% female plants showing 100% intersex as males. However, the next generation of males don't show any signs of pistils, etc - just behave like a normal male. So they are as messed up as messed up could be...
The only thing to do is get the genetics tested for markers and see if there is in fact no male chromosome....which was already stated in this thread.
Otherwise, you just have to go with the known facts - and that is a plant that is XX can not contribute a Y magically from no where....so it is fair to say they are all XX "males".
dank.Frank
The conclusion there, was that they are likely 100% female plants showing 100% intersex as males. However, the next generation of males don't show any signs of pistils, etc - just behave like a normal male. So they are as messed up as messed up could be...
The only thing to do is get the genetics tested for markers and see if there is in fact no male chromosome....which was already stated in this thread.
Otherwise, you just have to go with the known facts - and that is a plant that is XX can not contribute a Y magically from no where....so it is fair to say they are all XX "males".
dank.Frank
Last edited:
I grew out 5 Triangle Kush x '91 and ended up with 3 males and 2 fems. I didnt know how special these males were at the time so i chucked them, but i still have 5 tri91s and 10 D91s. The tri91 came out decent herb, the denser one was better and smells really limey in flower. Ends up with a skunky funky limey bud. Im running my last tri91 #1 plant out and may pop some more in the future after i get thru some other stuff i just received.
The pheno i have id say is a good solid 7/10. I never dialed her in tho, and im sure somewhere in these beans is something 9/10ish.
Here's some from the last run i did, this is a few days into drying, still needed more time.
some nugs
Pheno #1 9 weeks
cont...(pheno2)
The pheno i have id say is a good solid 7/10. I never dialed her in tho, and im sure somewhere in these beans is something 9/10ish.
Here's some from the last run i did, this is a few days into drying, still needed more time.
some nugs
Pheno #1 9 weeks
cont...(pheno2)
Pheno 2 Triangle Kush x 91
less dense, great plant but nothing stand out-ish
dried, sorry for the shitty focus....
- SubN
less dense, great plant but nothing stand out-ish
dried, sorry for the shitty focus....
- SubN
Im sorry Mack10 for the slight hijacking of your thread. I didnt mean to take focus off of your grow! I just wanted to throw in my 2c about the male and what its capable of. It did produce 3 males that were very obvious and, if i remember correctly, very nice and rigid looking.
Cheers!
- SubN
Cheers!
- SubN
Thanks for sharing your experience and some honest feedback! 
dank.Frank
dank.Frank
taggin in, hope ya find some real winners Mack.
G
gotsohigh
Which chem 91 mack skunk va or ??pathy one?
I was actually gettin' the skunk va from over the pond when delaying sh*t happened 'n' i got "leary" with the bigbutton phone
---dam thing called 'em itself!
Last edited:
