What's new
  • Happy Birthday ICMag! Been 20 years since Gypsy Nirvana created the forum! We are celebrating with a 4/20 Giveaway and by launching a new Patreon tier called "420club". You can read more here.
  • Important notice: ICMag's T.O.U. has been updated. Please review it here. For your convenience, it is also available in the main forum menu, under 'Quick Links"!

Let's Stop Posturing

Let's Stop Posturing
August 27, 2007 at 07:20:07 PT
Editorial
Source: Times-Standard

California -- No doubt some residents of Humboldt County were shocked last week when the Board of Supervisors, on a 4-0 vote with one abstention, approved a letter to state and federal officials asking them to legalize and tax marijuana.

We weren't shocked -- merely amused at the posturing of our politicians. But isn't that in a politician's DNA?

It's posturing because the board knows very well that their letter (along with that from Mendocino County, which gave Humboldt's board the idea by sending their own missive earlier) will quickly find its way into circular files in Sacramento and Washington, D.C.

It's posturing because even if legalization were to miraculously occur, the “billion-dollar crop” claimed by 2nd District Supervisor Roger Rodoni will be grown in the agricultural flatlands of the state, not in Humboldt's forests. (In Mendocino, they're dreaming about $50 million in annual revenues from a $5 billion crop. No doubt they've been sampling some of the product.)

And it's posturing because the pro-pot proponents already have cast their lot with the medical marijuana argument, and are too far down the road to shift gears now. If anything about this issue is even close to being realistic, it's that efforts would be better spent convincing the federal government to accept the decision by 12 states -- including California -- to allow use of pot for patients with various illnesses.

Since the U.S. Supreme Court nodded its approval two years ago, the federal Drug Enforcement Administration has raided more than 20 state-legal dispensaries of medical cannabis. Efforts to block that interference have met with failure in Congress -- in particular, the Hinchey-Rohrabacher amendment, which was defeated in the House again this year, 262-165.

There is no doubt that the war on drugs (started in California in 1907, seven years before national prohibition) has been as miserable a failure as the prohibition on booze.

Before 1907, according to an article in the San Francisco Chronicle, our state's drug crime consisted of a few hundred opium den misdemeanors. Today, California records 400,000 drug arrests per year, 250,000 of them felonies. In 1906, drug felons did not exist; today, they account for 20 percent of the state's prison population -- 36,000 prisoners.

Against those numbers, it's obvious that the U.S. needs to rethink its drug laws. But let's stop posturing, be realistic, and put our efforts behind federal approval of medical marijuana.
 

Rufid

Member
Get all the ca dispensery owners to offer a piece of the action to dea and see what happens.Give the bastards a way to save face and they'll probably take it.
 

NorCalChron

Member
the dea is too busy with poppy in afghanistan to worry about cannabis..

they will bust up a few clubs here and there but its small time
 
dea makes WAY more with it illegal. Don't think they don't think about money first, citizen health last. Look at the schools and all the people without insurance.

Cryptofascist AMERIKKKA.
 

Germanator

Member
The DEA is not concerned with the poppy fields of Afghanistan because they are the only stabilizing factor in most regions.

The DEA is certainly focused on MMJ in CA as this is the stepping stone to a larger national movement. If it stops in CA it will end here.

Germ
 

Rufid

Member
If I'm wrong correct me,but I seem to remember a news report that stated the military was not going to eradicate any poppy fields because the economy was so devestaed by the US invasion in afganistan. This was when they were first invaded and haven't heard anything since.
 
P

Paco

You are correct, the U.S. military tried to give farmers an option to grow other "cash" crops, but in the end they resorted to allowing and in some cases facilitaing the production and distribution. the economy was surly devestated by the invasion, but during the first months of destroying the feilds the farmers shrugged US demands to grow somthing else.
If that does not sound likley check out what the U.S. gov and military did in Nicaragua and S cental LA during Regans tenure. And bush has turned out to be far worse than Reagan.
CA needs to strenghten pro 215 by amending it to the states constitution like colorado did.At any rate if the DEA wasnot so wraped up in selling coke and ice they wold very likely leave cannabis legislation alone, but we are talking about the guys who almost failed out of high school, and couldn't tell you how the constitution should be used or even whats in it for that matter!
hopfully america stops sliding toward facsism, but after so many years it seems unlikley.
paco
 
S

stonedeconomist

i disagree with you 420patient. the posturing may not mean very much and it certainly won't make legalization a reality any time soon but the more elected officials who go on the record as saying the current federal drug policy is bull the better. it at least gives some sort of official contradiction to all the elected and appointed government officials who constantly regurgitate the official party line that pot is the root of all evil.
 

tngreen

Active member
Veteran
stonedeconomist said:
i disagree with you 420patient. the posturing may not mean very much and it certainly won't make legalization a reality any time soon but the more elected officials who go on the record as saying the current federal drug policy is bull the better. it at least gives some sort of official contradiction to all the elected and appointed government officials who constantly regurgitate the official party line that pot is the root of all evil.

i completely agree! if we want things to change, it needs to be done in this manner. Since it is something that doesn't affect every citizen (although in a way it does) it will take longer and more diplomatic means will have to be used. For instance, getting a President in office like Ron Paul. Having a figure like him at the top is exactly what we need. He wouldn't get things changed overnight but he will definitely stop the raiding of patients.
 
Top