[Bwanabud]

I'm not giving up my semi pistols or rifles, they are mine...I paid for them legally.

"this is my rifle, this is my gun"

[MrBungle]

Originally Posted by brookie

Long time hunter and gun owner here. There is no need for all the war weaponry out there.
Rifles- bolt,pump,single shot,double barrel, lever action. Those are your choices. If you are a hunter that is all you need. All semi auto rifles illegal.

shotguns - single,double,pump,bolt. No semi's learn how to shoot !

handguns- single,double,revolver. no semi's.

This would solve most of Amerikkka's problems with guns.

Speak for yourself... If that's how you feel, then defend yourself how you see fit.... Don't encroach on me, and what I choose to defend myself with....

Edit: I wish Jerry's finger was not on the trigger in that picture

[G.O. Joe]

Originally Posted by packerfan79

I am at the point that I would be ok, with letting the blue states leave the union.

Are the blue states asking for this or should the red states kick out the blue states or what exactly? You'd find the country less black and white or blue and red in the first place with a less extreme measure too, if one-sided for-profit and special interests political propaganda spin doctoring left the airwaves. God help us now with the internet.

Another old law someone should consider bringing back the old assault weapons ban. Instead of taking hissyfit positions on both sides. You can still have your Gatling gun if you go through the process anyways.

[igrowone]

emotions run strong on this, but i don't see bloody revolution in the cards(yet)
take NY and its SAFE act
some semis are deemed assault and must be registered, you can't buy new ones
was there blood in the streets? none that i've seen
and this is how it works, other states are aware of how things played out and use this info in future decisions

[packerfan79]

Originally Posted by igrowone

emotions run strong on this, but i don't see bloody revolution in the cards(yet)
take NY and its SAFE act
some semis are deemed assault and must be registered, you can't buy new ones
was there blood in the streets? none that i've seen
and this is how it works, other states are aware of how things played out and use this info in future decisions

Their is a resistance to the safe act. Only 3% of owners of assault rifles in NY state have registered their guns.97% have refused to abide by the law. The law enforcement community is not showing much ambition to try and enforce the law. I would call that a significant resistance.

Let me be clear I am not advocating for armed resistance. Just stating my thoughts on likely situations. I am advocating for the rights of law abiding citizens, so these potential situations don't have to happen.

[igrowone]

Originally Posted by packerfan79

Their is a resistance to the safe act. Only 3% of owners of assault rifles in NY state have registered their guns.97% have refused to abide by the law. The law enforcement community is not showing much ambition to try and enforce the law. I would call that a significant resistance.

Let me be clear I am not advocating for armed resistance. Just stating my thoughts on likely situations. I am advocating for the rights of law abiding citizens, so these potential situations don't have to happen.

i'd agree with that assessment
resistance yes, armed defiance not so much
it's how it starts - slow and cautious

[BurnOne]

The best way to stop a bad guy with a gun is five good guys with five guns. You can never have enough good guys with guns.

(RNN) – One school district in Pennsylvania has sidestepped the debate over arming teachers with firearms by arming teachers, instead, with buckets of rocks.
“If an armed intruder attempts to gain entrance into any of our classrooms, they will face a classroom full of students armed with rocks and they will be stoned,” he said.

Somebody is fucking stoned.
Damn, how fucking stupid can people get!
Burn1

[trichrider]

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-FDsM57v8Nc

IMPORTANT NOTICE: No media files are hosted on these forums. By clicking the link below you agree to view content from an external website. We can not be held responsible for the suitability or legality of this material. If the video does not play, wait a minute or try again later.

I AGREE

[BurnOne]

^^^ Yeah that.

[Bwanabud]

This thread has taken a twisted turn in the road, no legal gun owners are breaking any weapons laws today as we speak...if restrictions or change is implemented then some may be on the wrong side of the law.

Many don't own guns, many don't want to own guns, many don't participate in in sporting/outdoor activities involving guns, many are afraid of guns, many don't understand guns,,,,be that as it may, law stands today on the side of legal gun ownership. To debate the moral ramifications and social "injustice" of gun ownership, is akin to what we as a community have fought against in relation to unfair weed laws.

Personally I have no problem with "common sense" gun laws, but fear it won't stop there. We will give an inch, lose a mile...then wonder why we compromised on our rights. Gun ownership is an individual choice, one you can participate in or not...but a throng of children that don't vote, won't sway my beliefs...especially when 1 of the leaders has a Cuban flag on her arm, probably funded by a leftist group of bunny huggers.

Change may be coming, restrictions might be stiffened, future generations may strive for a different world...but it's legal now, I needn't defend my right to own guns nor my intended use.