[Itsgotatail]

Yeah those are certainly some sexy, streamlined setups. I see they have a 60L also. I'm thinking of a way I could split the stream coming out of my material column to go into 2 separate 12x12" columns for collection, since I already have most of those parts. I suppose it wouldn't be too difficult...just a valve to flip when the first gets close to full and I'd be recovering from both all the time. And I'd need another shatter platter. My (1200W) heater that warms the shatter platter bath can probably keep up with two of them at once. I'm guessing this dual collection pot method would be the fastest and cheapest way to run 4 trs21's and a 6x48" column at once. Doh! But then I'd have to upgrade my recovery tank again...I can currently only hold 48lb. Maybe I could do a 6x36" material column That would still hold more than my current 4x48" and 48lb might cut it but it would definitely still require more than just one 12x12"+shatter platter for collection.

[Gray Wolf]

Originally Posted by HashoftheTitans

Purge Labs makes a 600L jacketed collection pot with a bottom drain for collection.

Are they certified to ASME?

[HashoftheTitans]

Originally Posted by Gray Wolf

Are they certified to ASME?

They have ASME and non. The former is obviously more pricey.

My quotes a few months ago:

Size/non-ASME$/ASME$:
100L/15000/25000
200L/27000/45000
600L/52500/65000

[HashoftheTitans]

Originally Posted by HashoftheTitans

They have ASME and non. The former is obviously more pricey.

My quotes a few months ago:

Size/non-ASME$/ASME$:
100L/15000/25000
200L/27000/45000
600L/52500/65000

Those are pre-order prices BTW. Stocked ASME are 40k/65k/100k

[Gray Wolf]

Originally Posted by HashoftheTitans

They have ASME and non. The former is obviously more pricey.

My quotes a few months ago:

Size/non-ASME$/ASME$:
100L/15000/25000
200L/27000/45000
600L/52500/65000

Sooo, you got me curious and I took a look. It appears they've designed their "reactor" around a couple dished heads and a short wrapper, and gotten around the force on a full lid that size, by installing a smaller lid in the top head.

That begs the question of how they are finishing the concentrate, because if they remove all the LPG in the reactor vessel, how will they remove the concentrate, or subsequently maintain a food/pharma quality equipment cleaning standard?

More process data needed.................

The bottom tap suggests that they are using the vessel for gross removal, but draining it off the bottom while it still flows well enough to do so.

[HashoftheTitans]

Originally Posted by Gray Wolf

Sooo, you got me curious and I took a look. It appears they've designed their "reactor" around a couple dished heads and a short wrapper, and gotten around the force on a full lid that size, by installing a smaller lid in the top head.

That begs the question of how they are finishing the concentrate, because if they remove all the LPG in the reactor vessel, how will they remove the concentrate, or subsequently maintain a food/pharma quality equipment cleaning standard?

More process data needed.................

The bottom tap suggests that they are using the vessel for gross removal, but draining it off the bottom while it still flows well enough to do so.

I've seen guys on IG bump the heat and pressurize the chamber with nitrogen and fill 5 gallon buckets with crude. I imagine with that much material, recovering down to -10ish will still leave enough solvent in the material to flow.