What's new
  • Happy Birthday ICMag! Been 20 years since Gypsy Nirvana created the forum! We are celebrating with a 4/20 Giveaway and by launching a new Patreon tier called "420club". You can read more here.
  • Important notice: ICMag's T.O.U. has been updated. Please review it here. For your convenience, it is also available in the main forum menu, under 'Quick Links"!

Lockheed Martin Claims Fusion Breakthrough That Could Change World Forever

dddaver

Active member
Veteran
This really CHARGED me up. Pun intended. Theoretically everyone could easily power a 50,000 watt, air-conditioned grow room, the rest of the house, and even charge up your car with a PU bed ( nuts, they do say truck size, but I just want a small one :biggrin:) fusion unit? That makes NO waste? I want one. They do emphasize IF their build next year works.

Lockheed Martin Claims Fusion Breakthrough That Could Change World Forever

Comment Now Follow Comments



Lockheed Martin, the aerospace and defense conglomerate based in Bethesda, Md., is claiming to have made a major breakthrough in nuclear fusion, which could lead to development of reactors small enough to fit on the back of a truck within a decade.
In the simplest terms, nuclear fission breaks a single atom into two whereas nuclear fusion combines two atoms into one.
Fusion, the holy grail of nuclear power, creates three to four times as much energy as fission. More importantly, fusion’s key advantage over fission is that it does not produce cancer-causing radioactive waste.
Tom McGuire, who heads the project, told Reuters that his team had been working on fusion energy at Lockheed’s Skunk Works program for the past four years, but decided to go public with the news now to recruit additional partners in industry and government to support their work.
Last year, while speaking at Google’s Solve for X program, Charles Chase , a research scientist at Skunk Works, described Lockheed’s effort to build a trailer-sized fusion power plant that turns cheap and plentiful hydrogen (deuterium and tritium) into helium plus enough energy to power a small city.
“It’s safe, it’s clean, and Lockheed is promising an operational unit by 2017 with assembly line production to follow, enabling everything from unlimited fresh water to engines that take spacecraft to Mars in one month instead of six,” Evan Ackerman wrote in a post about Chase’s Google GOOGL -1.5% talk on Dvice.
The key breakthrough involves using a “magnetic bottle” to contain the vast amount of heat, which rises into the hundreds of millions of degrees, created by the nuclear reaction. Containing and controlling the staggering levels of heat and pressure involved has hampered countless previous efforts to use fusion for generating electricity. The challenges associated with controlling the heat and pressure created by nuclear fusion has been especially difficult at smaller scales, which makes Lockheed’s claimed breakthrough all the more impressive.
“By containing this reaction, we can release [the heat] in a controlled fashion to create energy we can use,” Lockheed said in a statement. “The heat energy created using this compact fusion reactor will drive turbine generators by replacing the combustion chambers with simple heat exchangers. In turn, the turbines will then generate electricity or the propulsive power for a number of applications.”
Lockheed said in a statement that it would build a pilot fusion reactor in the next year.
If it works, the world will be a different place.
But in the meantime the emphasis should remain on the word “if.”
 

igrowone

Well-known member
Veteran
there has been some progress lately, i believe one of the government fusion projects had a breakthrough of its own
and a few things are hyped, the clean is relative, there will be waste, maybe less than fission plants
but fusion is the cute fuzzy rabbit of nuke, it has better press
still, major corporation that will look bad if this falls flat, and big corps don't like to look bad
 

resinryder

Rubbing my glands together
Veteran
Power companies will buy the patent and it will disappear into the neither regions of a corporate file cabinet.
 

kakaman

Member
From what I gain after reading the Lockheed Martin website it makes a big deal out of how they were able to make fusion reactions happen on a smaller scale. It dose not mention if they were able to get more energy out of the fusion reaction than what they had to put in to it to make it happen. If you need to put more energy into the reaction than what you get out of it this would make their new reactor just a new way of storing and transporting energy NOT a new energy source.

one argument made against electric cars is the car may not produce co2 because it runs on electricity but in order to get the electricity for the car the energy would most likely come from a coal or oil power plat that produces co2.

If you have an energy medium rather than a source you would still be dependent on fossil flue to create the energy in the first place.
 

HempKat

Just A Simple Old Dirt Farmer
Veteran
From what I gain after reading the Lockheed Martin website it makes a big deal out of how they were able to make fusion reactions happen on a smaller scale. It dose not mention if they were able to get more energy out of the fusion reaction than what they had to put in to it to make it happen. If you need to put more energy into the reaction than what you get out of it this would make their new reactor just a new way of storing and transporting energy NOT a new energy source.

one argument made against electric cars is the car may not produce co2 because it runs on electricity but in order to get the electricity for the car the energy would most likely come from a coal or oil power plat that produces co2.

If you have an energy medium rather than a source you would still be dependent on fossil flue to create the energy in the first place.

Not necessarily, in my area there is an option to switch your electric service to one that is 100% generated thru solar, wind and other green energy sources. So it is a faulty assumption that an electric car would likely have to be charged by electricity coming from coal. The catch though, as there always is one, the green sources of energy tend to be more expensive.
 

kakaman

Member
It looks like this is just some pie in the sky bullshit put out to grab investors money like almost ever other past "breakthrough" in the field of nuclear fusion. In this article the sixth paragraph down says NO PROTOTYPE HAS BEEN BUILT OR TESTED YET!!!

http://www.theverge.com/2014/10/15/...unces-its-skunk-works-wants-to-build-a-fusion

They have announced a break through that they have not demonstrated to work in real life!! I on the other hand have found a way to take apart smoke detectors and use the radioactive stuff in them to mix with ice cubes and make cold nuclear fusion! I just need people to send me lots and lots of cash to further my revolutionary project.
 

Max Headroom

Well-known member
Veteran
since energy is the basic currency the world runs on, and since the powers that be have built their power structure upon the scarcity of energy, there will never be 'free' or 'cheap' energy since that would upset the whole apple cart.
 

bombadil.360

Andinismo Hierbatero
Veteran
if anyone can check-mate the power companies and oil, it is the private sector, and the Skunkworks is probably one of the most technologically advanced and economically powerful private company out there; so they won't sell patents to any government and much less power company.

these guys are on a different league all together. no university research unit even compares... there's probably only two or three more private companies in the whole world that compares to the Skunkworks...

I've been following this beta fusion reactor since I first read about it days after it was presented at the 'solve for x' last year, or was it the year before? anyway...

here's the presentation from the horse's mouth:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JAsRFVbcyUY

I really hope it works and is not just hype... I think they already have working prototypes and with the presentation they are testing the waters to see just how much opposition surfaces after the announcement...


peace
 

Max Headroom

Well-known member
Veteran
my only hope for 'free' or cheap energy are 3D printers. print your own generator. otherwise the distribution part of it can always be chocked off by those with money and vested interests.
 

DrFever

Active member
Veteran
Isn't lockheed martin the most corrupt company in the defense system ????
Lockheed Martin's role in starting wars, bribery, spying on Americans, and even failure to deliver benefits to wounded vets, is just the icing on the Cake, i wouldn't believe anything coming from these idiots IMO they must have something up there sleeve on this one

one just has to look at the F-35 scam of the century ??? its just 1.5 trillion dollar tax payord expense

124.8 for a F35A while costs are still going up F35B 156.8 million for one plane hahaha while
the US states this is the 5gen plane yet comparing the plane to lets say the typhoon Euro fighter
it gets its ass kicked
 

Mikell

Dipshit Know-Nothing
ICMag Donor
Veteran
^Do you smoke crack before you write this bullshit?
 
Last edited:

Max Headroom

Well-known member
Veteran
All defense contractors are most certainly corrupt.
war is an extremely profitable business. that's why there is so much of it.
 

Stoner4Life

Medicinal Advocate
ICMag Donor
Veteran
I think this is a couple of years old already.......

Kube.png





 

bombadil.360

Andinismo Hierbatero
Veteran
LOL @ mini nuclear generator :D

you know a nuclear power plant is based on really basic and old technology.

atomic energy heats up water really hot, turning it into vapor, the vapor then makes a turbine spin, and from the spin, electricity is produced.

so basically it is a vapor train engine that throws out tons of radioactive waste.

anyone who thought that mini-nuclear generator was for real, did not even have a basic understanding of how electricity is made.

peace!
 
Top