-
Happy Birthday ICMag! Been 20 years since Gypsy Nirvana created the forum! We are celebrating with a 4/20 Giveaway and by launching a new Patreon tier called "420club". You can read more here.
-
Important notice: ICMag's T.O.U. has been updated. Please review it here. For your convenience, it is also available in the main forum menu, under 'Quick Links"!
SRM/GEOENGINEERING
- Thread starter trichrider
- Start date
They cant hide it much longer,the shills have been exposed. The damage done cannot be fixed. I dont know what to say anymore..I have personally collected and examined enviromental fiber falling from the sky. People must be held accountable for this crime against our planet.
peace,
juggo
peace,
juggo
Last edited:
Atmospheric controls on northeast Pacific temperature variability and change, 1900–2012
James A. Johnstonea,1 and
Nathan J. Mantuaa,b
Edited by Ping Chang, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX, and accepted by the Editorial Board August 19, 2014 (received for review October 4, 2013)
Significance
Northeast Pacific coastal warming since 1900 is often ascribed to anthropogenic greenhouse forcing, whereas multidecadal temperature changes are widely interpreted in the framework of the Pacific Decadal Oscillation (PDO), which responds to regional atmospheric dynamics. This study uses several independent data sources to demonstrate that century-long warming around the northeast Pacific margins, like multidecadal variability, can be primarily attributed to changes in atmospheric circulation. It presents a significant reinterpretation of the region’s recent climate change origins, showing that atmospheric conditions have changed substantially over the last century, that these changes are not likely related to historical anthropogenic and natural radiative forcing, and that dynamical mechanisms of interannual and multidecadal temperature variability can also apply to observed century-long trends.
Abstract
Over the last century, northeast Pacific coastal sea surface temperatures (SSTs) and land-based surface air temperatures (SATs) display multidecadal variations associated with the Pacific Decadal Oscillation, in addition to a warming trend of ∼0.5–1 °C. Using independent records of sea-level pressure (SLP), SST, and SAT, this study investigates northeast (NE) Pacific coupled atmosphere–ocean variability from 1900 to 2012, with emphasis on the coastal areas around North America. We use a linear stochastic time series model to show that the SST evolution around the NE Pacific coast can be explained by a combination of regional atmospheric forcing and ocean persistence, accounting for 63% of nonseasonal monthly SST variance (r = 0.79) and 73% of variance in annual means (r = 0.86). We show that SLP reductions and related atmospheric forcing led to century-long warming around the NE Pacific margins, with the strongest trends observed from 1910–1920 to 1940. NE Pacific circulation changes are estimated to account for more than 80% of the 1900–2012 linear warming in coastal NE Pacific SST and US Pacific northwest (Washington, Oregon, and northern California) SAT. An ensemble of climate model simulations run under the same historical radiative forcings fails to reproduce the observed regional circulation trends. These results suggest that natural internally generated changes in atmospheric circulation were the primary cause of coastal NE Pacific warming from 1900 to 2012 and demonstrate more generally that regional mechanisms of interannual and multidecadal temperature variability can also extend to century time scales.
http://www.pnas.org/content/early/2014/09/16/1318371111.abstract
James A. Johnstonea,1 and
Nathan J. Mantuaa,b
Edited by Ping Chang, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX, and accepted by the Editorial Board August 19, 2014 (received for review October 4, 2013)
Significance
Northeast Pacific coastal warming since 1900 is often ascribed to anthropogenic greenhouse forcing, whereas multidecadal temperature changes are widely interpreted in the framework of the Pacific Decadal Oscillation (PDO), which responds to regional atmospheric dynamics. This study uses several independent data sources to demonstrate that century-long warming around the northeast Pacific margins, like multidecadal variability, can be primarily attributed to changes in atmospheric circulation. It presents a significant reinterpretation of the region’s recent climate change origins, showing that atmospheric conditions have changed substantially over the last century, that these changes are not likely related to historical anthropogenic and natural radiative forcing, and that dynamical mechanisms of interannual and multidecadal temperature variability can also apply to observed century-long trends.
Abstract
Over the last century, northeast Pacific coastal sea surface temperatures (SSTs) and land-based surface air temperatures (SATs) display multidecadal variations associated with the Pacific Decadal Oscillation, in addition to a warming trend of ∼0.5–1 °C. Using independent records of sea-level pressure (SLP), SST, and SAT, this study investigates northeast (NE) Pacific coupled atmosphere–ocean variability from 1900 to 2012, with emphasis on the coastal areas around North America. We use a linear stochastic time series model to show that the SST evolution around the NE Pacific coast can be explained by a combination of regional atmospheric forcing and ocean persistence, accounting for 63% of nonseasonal monthly SST variance (r = 0.79) and 73% of variance in annual means (r = 0.86). We show that SLP reductions and related atmospheric forcing led to century-long warming around the NE Pacific margins, with the strongest trends observed from 1910–1920 to 1940. NE Pacific circulation changes are estimated to account for more than 80% of the 1900–2012 linear warming in coastal NE Pacific SST and US Pacific northwest (Washington, Oregon, and northern California) SAT. An ensemble of climate model simulations run under the same historical radiative forcings fails to reproduce the observed regional circulation trends. These results suggest that natural internally generated changes in atmospheric circulation were the primary cause of coastal NE Pacific warming from 1900 to 2012 and demonstrate more generally that regional mechanisms of interannual and multidecadal temperature variability can also extend to century time scales.
http://www.pnas.org/content/early/2014/09/16/1318371111.abstract
how is foolmar gonna dismiss this? http://topinfopost.com/2014/09/17/t...es-chemtrails-100-proof-we-are-being-poisoned
I really thought an increase in whale farts had something to do with it. Who would of thunk something like atmospheric circulation could be causing all of our problems?
For weeks now. I thought it was from the African dust that blew over back in late July I believe. My ears are plugged again this morning. I am not a big allergy sufferer either.
I been ok but I noticed a few people ill, but could just be time of year and fact most people dont have good immune systems. I take tangy tangerine, frankincense, nascent iodine and colloidal silver every day so I dont usually get ill. Aint been ill in any sense not even a cold since 2008
The cause of solar dimming and brightening at the Earth's surface during the last half century: Evidence from measurements of sunshine duration
Abstract
Analysis of the Angstrom-Prescott relationship between normalized values of global radiation and sunshine duration measured during the last 50 years made at five sites with a wide range of climate and aerosol emissions showed few significant differences in atmospheric transmissivity under clear or cloud-covered skies between years when global dimming occurred and years when global brightening was measured, nor in most cases were there any significant changes in the parameters or in their relationships to annual rates of fossil fuel combustion in the surrounding 1° cells. It is concluded that at the sites studied changes in cloud cover rather than anthropogenic aerosols emissions played the major role in determining solar dimming and brightening during the last half century and that there are reasons to suppose that these findings may have wider relevance.
http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/2013JD021308/abstract#.VCb1qxAAy4M.twitter
Abstract
Analysis of the Angstrom-Prescott relationship between normalized values of global radiation and sunshine duration measured during the last 50 years made at five sites with a wide range of climate and aerosol emissions showed few significant differences in atmospheric transmissivity under clear or cloud-covered skies between years when global dimming occurred and years when global brightening was measured, nor in most cases were there any significant changes in the parameters or in their relationships to annual rates of fossil fuel combustion in the surrounding 1° cells. It is concluded that at the sites studied changes in cloud cover rather than anthropogenic aerosols emissions played the major role in determining solar dimming and brightening during the last half century and that there are reasons to suppose that these findings may have wider relevance.
http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/2013JD021308/abstract#.VCb1qxAAy4M.twitter
A lot of people coldish around here too, dunno if its to do with chemtrails as that seems to be less of an issue in Europe. But I am sure our immune systems are taking big hits from roundup in our vegs and fruits, antibiotics and gmo/roundup fed to our cattle and in general unhealthy preservatives in any produced food.
Healthy food is a luxury many can't afford and to 99% a complete illusion. An apple a day keeps the doctor away, ha.
Healthy food is a luxury many can't afford and to 99% a complete illusion. An apple a day keeps the doctor away, ha.
less of an issue? south east uk is one of most heavily sprayed regions of the world.
as for healthy food being unaffordable - i think this is a myth.
very easy to eat healthily cheaply, just unfortunate so many people are lazy, uneducated an uncreative when it comes to food and cooking.
i do however believe these days you must pay to avoid carcinogens, so admittedly an organic underarm deodorant is a about 6 times more expensive than an aluminium loaded poison
but what price your health?
as for healthy food being unaffordable - i think this is a myth.
very easy to eat healthily cheaply, just unfortunate so many people are lazy, uneducated an uncreative when it comes to food and cooking.
i do however believe these days you must pay to avoid carcinogens, so admittedly an organic underarm deodorant is a about 6 times more expensive than an aluminium loaded poison
but what price your health?
I am not able to afford a full organic food diet, besides most organic food isnt what i would consider organic anyway. I grow a lot of vegs myself but a complete selfsustaining farm would be a fulltime job and then there would still be bills to pay. Our system is build in such a way you cant get a legitimate business going without big investments and a crippling loan from a bank. And then a small organic farm is unlikely to support those costs. So unless you have rich family or funds saved up through less than legitimate business, no way.
Besides that how healthy can anything be if air and rain are becoming toxic themselves.
If you have other ideas of eating healthy while not going broke do share...
fresh vegetables, fruit, pulses, beans and spices cost fuck all, organic or not
rice, pasta, cous cous - also not expensive.
certain fish are also inexpensive
bulk buy dried foods
meat might be expensive but i dont eat it
rice, pasta, cous cous - also not expensive.
certain fish are also inexpensive
bulk buy dried foods
meat might be expensive but i dont eat it
http://articles.*******.com/sites/articles/archive/2013/11/26/corn-based-ethanol.aspx
well that was a bust. sorry.
well that was a bust. sorry.
