What's new
  • Happy Birthday ICMag! Been 20 years since Gypsy Nirvana created the forum! We are celebrating with a 4/20 Giveaway and by launching a new Patreon tier called "420club". You can read more here.
  • Important notice: ICMag's T.O.U. has been updated. Please review it here. For your convenience, it is also available in the main forum menu, under 'Quick Links"!

Inhale: Marijuana initiatives should keep Senate Democratic

RetroGrow

Active member
Veteran
Dems need to get a clue, but Harry Reid is a Mormon:

"When it comes to supporting the national push to legalize marijuana in several states, Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid and his Democratic colleagues should just inhale. It might save their jobs.

Armed with powerful statistics, Brookings Institution expert John Hudak said that having pro-marijuana initiatives on the fall ballot should draw younger, passionate Democrats to the polls and help Reid keep his leadership position and the Senate in Democratic hands.

“The presence of those initiatives will likely drive younger and more liberal voters to the polls,” said Hudak in his report titled “Harry Reid should love marijuana: How legalization could help keep the Senate blue.”

Marijuana legalization is on the Alaska and Oregon ballots, two states the GOP hopes to pick up in its bid to take control of the chamber.

His science is simple and proven out over past elections. For example, he found that 2012 marijuana initiatives in Colorado and Washington drew younger, liberal voters.

But he also showed how Republicans used their own hot-button issue — gay marriage — to draw their partisans to the polls. In those elections, voters passionate about gay marriage shucked their apathy and stormed the polls to vote it down. And while in the voting booth, they pulled the switch for GOP candidates.

Hudak said that Democrats are missing out on bigger gains by not getting behind legalization initiatives, like the GOP did on same-sex marriage bans.

“Democrats have missed a real opportunity to make electoral gains — or limit losses — by pushing legalization initiatives. Some credit President Bush’s reelection in 2004 to the push for same sex marriage initiatives on statewide ballots by spurring social conservative turnout. Democrats could have received a similar boost by pushing legalization initiatives that would alter the electorate in a year when Democrats need it for structural and political reasons,” he wrote in a report posted on the Brookings blog.
Inhale: Marijuana initiatives should keep Senate Democratic
By Paul Bedard | August 25, 2014 | 11:53 am
Topics: Washington Secrets Gay Marriage Harry Reid Alaska Oregon 2014 Elections 2016 Elections Campaigns George W. Bush Marijuana Law
Photo - AP Photo AP Photo

When it comes to supporting the national push to legalize marijuana in several states, Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid and his Democratic colleagues should just inhale. It might save their jobs.

Armed with powerful statistics, Brookings Institution expert John Hudak said that having pro-marijuana initiatives on the fall ballot should draw younger, passionate Democrats to the polls and help Reid keep his leadership position and the Senate in Democratic hands.

“The presence of those initiatives will likely drive younger and more liberal voters to the polls,” said Hudak in his report titled “Harry Reid should love marijuana: How legalization could help keep the Senate blue.”

Marijuana legalization is on the Alaska and Oregon ballots, two states the GOP hopes to pick up in its bid to take control of the chamber.

His science is simple and proven out over past elections. For example, he found that 2012 marijuana initiatives in Colorado and Washington drew younger, liberal voters.

But he also showed how Republicans used their own hot-button issue — gay marriage — to draw their partisans to the polls. In those elections, voters passionate about gay marriage shucked their apathy and stormed the polls to vote it down. And while in the voting booth, they pulled the switch for GOP candidates.

Hudak said that Democrats are missing out on bigger gains by not getting behind legalization initiatives, like the GOP did on same-sex marriage bans.

“Democrats have missed a real opportunity to make electoral gains — or limit losses — by pushing legalization initiatives. Some credit President Bush’s reelection in 2004 to the push for same sex marriage initiatives on statewide ballots by spurring social conservative turnout. Democrats could have received a similar boost by pushing legalization initiatives that would alter the electorate in a year when Democrats need it for structural and political reasons,” he wrote in a report posted on the Brookings blog.

But he also suggested that Democrats might consider saving a big marijuana push for the 2016 presidential election, when younger voters will be called upon to give their side a win.

“Legalization supporters would be wise to wait until 2016 and capitalize on a dual effect. A presidential election year will bring out voters more sympathetic to legalization, and legalization will bring out even more young, liberal voters than normal,” wrote Hudak."

http://washingtonexaminer.com/inhal...should-keep-senate-democratic/article/2552401
 

armedoldhippy

Well-known member
Veteran
if they wait till 2016, they might get another Democrat elected president, but whoever that is may be hamstrung by a GOP controlled Senate. if they toss us under the bus this year planning to capitalize on us in two more years, I will not go out and vote for them. I want to see something positive from them THIS FUCKING year...THIS year, not two years from now.:rant:
 

RetroGrow

Active member
Veteran
They would throw us under the bus if they could without thinking twice about it.
I think there will be a tremendous backlash vote against the Democrats, after this disaster that has been the Obama administration. Never has there been a worse Presidency. Blunder after blunder after blunder. Trading weapons to the cartel. Criminals and terrorists pouring over our southern border. Middle East in flames.
CNSNews.com) - President Barack Obama sent no White House representative to the memorial Mass held yesterday in Rochester, New Hampshire, for James Foley, the American journalist beheaded by the Islamic State in Iraq and al-Sham (ISIS) terrorists.

President Obama, however, did send three White House aides to Monday’s funeral for Michael Brown, an 18-year-old African American fatally shot in an encounter with a white police officer in Ferguson, Mo.
This illustrates the pathological racism of our President, and how low the current administration has sunken.
The choices for president are not good. I could not stand to see another Clinton in the White House, yet I feel the same way about Romney.
What's a voter to do, if they continue to nominate the same ole same ole?
 

bigAl25

Active member
Veteran
Sometimes I think too many people have not lived long enough, or voted in enough elections to view our current political situation in the proper light. If you think the Obama administration is a disaster, then you have not lived through the Nixon years, Regan's war on drugs(blacks and Hispanics) and a 6800 dow created by George W. Bush. If your memories are that short, or you haven't lived long enough to be impacted by these previous screw-ups, then start to study our political history and become a more educated American. Colorado and Washington legal deals would not prosper under a Republican administration.
 

m314

Active member
ICMag Donor
Veteran
Legalization would have done well under a Ron Paul administration. The raids on medical dispensaries would have ended overnight. It would have been worse if Romney or Santorum had won, obviously.
 

rives

Inveterate Tinkerer
Mentor
ICMag Donor
Veteran
Sometimes I think too many people have not lived long enough, or voted in enough elections to view our current political situation in the proper light. If you think the Obama administration is a disaster, then you have not lived through the Nixon years, Regan's war on drugs(blacks and Hispanics) and a 6800 dow created by George W. Bush. If your memories are that short, or you haven't lived long enough to be impacted by these previous screw-ups, then start to study our political history and become a more educated American. Colorado and Washington legal deals would not prosper under a Republican administration.

I lived through all of that. While there have been some phenomenal fuck-ups, Obama is a very serious contender for the big prize and still has 2-1/2 years to go.
 

Skinny Leaf

Well-known member
Veteran
If your memories are that short, or you haven't lived long enough to be impacted by these previous screw-ups, then start to study our political history and become a more educated American.


When does class begin? Will there be a test at the end?
 

NEGT1

Member
They would throw us under the bus if they could without thinking twice about it.
I think there will be a tremendous backlash vote against the Democrats, after this disaster that has been the Obama administration. Never has there been a worse Presidency. Blunder after blunder after blunder. Trading weapons to the cartel. Criminals and terrorists pouring over our southern border. Middle East in flames.
CNSNews.com) - President Barack Obama sent no White House representative to the memorial Mass held yesterday in Rochester, New Hampshire, for James Foley, the American journalist beheaded by the Islamic State in Iraq and al-Sham (ISIS) terrorists.

President Obama, however, did send three White House aides to Monday’s funeral for Michael Brown, an 18-year-old African American fatally shot in an encounter with a white police officer in Ferguson, Mo.
This illustrates the pathological racism of our President, and how low the current administration has sunken.
The choices for president are not good. I could not stand to see another Clinton in the White House, yet I feel the same way about Romney.
What's a voter to do, if they continue to nominate the same ole same ole?


Well this is interesting. I agree, and disagree with points you have made but I have to say, America is changing, it's not the country it was even 20 years ago. Progression is tough, but an important aspect of true happiness.
 

Slim Pickens

Well-known member
Veteran
Does anyone here think that we would have any legal states at all if this were a Romney administration?I don't think so...

Obama is a poor excuse for a president...almost as poor as Romney would have been,but that doesn't change the truth.Obama decided to take the GOP plank,and let the states decide....while Romney would have brought down the hammer.
 

gaiusmarius

me
Veteran
i have to laugh at folks comparing administrations and presidents, if you are color blind it's very easy to see that each president has gotten progressively worse. it really doesn't matter if you vote red or blue, when it comes to foreign policy, war on drugs, NSA and co, black ops in other countries, the next guy will probably be even worse.
 

Latest posts

Latest posts

Top