I'm no legal guru but...if fire, mould, abuse were / are the issues, then why can't the fact that HC didn't implement an inspection system be brought up in court?
As far as I know, this was part of the defense. I believe it was stated that if the government had done there part with inspections, electrical problems, environmental(mold & mildew) problems, and abuse would have been under control.
Ah I was hoping for some proper ass whooping for the Con guys mould and electrical wiring dangers will bring down gods furry on us all but the Liberal guy was too fast to hit the election button. The woman was on a roll but this was just a bs interview to get more viewer numbers instead of proper debate.
So all the gov has is mould, electrical problems and smell holly fuck how about you inspect any house that is 30 years old.
Now regarding "organized crime" doing grow rips. LoL 2012 had 30K break and enters in BC alone http://www.pssg.gov.bc.ca/policeservices/shareddocs/crime-statistics.pdf
So having a home is a danger to yourself from being robbed, raped or murdered.
If a safety pressident is set, then...
"AWAY WITH ALL THE OWNING OF HOUSES, FOR SAFETY REASONS ONLY BIG CORPORATION WILL BE ALLOWED TO OWN HOUSES"...this will make it safe for all concerned.
[This message has been paid for by the Conservative party of Canada.]
hahaha...what a backward way of thinking...
This(SAFETY) is the reason for inspections Mr. Harper.
Peace...B