What's new
  • Happy Birthday ICMag! Been 20 years since Gypsy Nirvana created the forum! We are celebrating with a 4/20 Giveaway and by launching a new Patreon tier called "420club". You can read more here.
  • Important notice: ICMag's T.O.U. has been updated. Please review it here. For your convenience, it is also available in the main forum menu, under 'Quick Links"!

Is Pot lawful in australia?

Status
Not open for further replies.

isaih520

Member
[YOUTUBEIF]MB62md2KKjw[/YOUTUBEIF]

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MB62md2KKjw

Note they were trying to get her agreement.
And everytime they said 'youre under arrest" she said no.
And so they had to keep trying.
She shouldn'tve caved. It was a con job.
They needed her agreement and she eventually gave it.

She should've made them use violence. They damn well wouldve if the camera wasn't there.
queensland police is a foreign owned company. A business owned by people overseas. Thats treason.
These traitors have nothing to do with us or our commonwealth or our law.

And if Australian men had half the balls this woman has, traitors would find their reward at the end of a rope as per the crimes act 1914.

Her dopey boyfriend didnt know what day it was. He should've defended her rights.
Thats what men did in ye days of olde because that is the law.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
G

GeneralExecutor

Yes, she somehow bought into it, even though here conscious was telling her not to, her subconscious seemed to be in conflict merely by her actions in the end. Strange psychological dynamics at play when people are placed in such a spot.

When they arrived and after they refused to leave (early in the piece), she may have tried calling the Sheriff advising him that she is "a citizen (or an Australian national) of Australia-in-the-Comonwealth", accepting his Oath of Office and "calling" (ie, "I thereby call for you to...") him to FULFILL HIS fiduciary duty that he NOW has in the agency which she just established with him (by the said accepting of his Oath), asking him to immediately come over and arrest them and citing the reasons (which she was already aware of). If she did that, then it is his duty to do act on her demand (calling). We would wager that he would have acted properly if she did as said, if she knew exactly HOW to express herself in that manner properly. Had he NOT, it would have all been recorded as we saw, then he could have been made to stand down at a later time by applying proper administrative process to that effect. Once removed from office, he could have been treated as a normal person (ie, liened in the private for damages resulting from his inaction and dereliction of duty, and without any form of Court proceedings, all done by private admin process).

It's a thought, but then again, what would we know? Would not be the first time our words have fallen on deaf ears.



Just thought to link people here to Tammi Pepperman, quite interesting and well researched stuff:

Part 1:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gDER3-PwGMc&list=PL3A6A9DB1B887288D&index=33


Part 2:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ei29Jsysq40&list=PL3A6A9DB1B887288D&index=34


Those wanting to hear or learn more from tammi [hi GB] can have a look in her Youtube channel.
 

isaih520

Member
No what she should've done was sent her boyfriend to man school.
When the police are at the gate , he yells out the window ' you trespass , i'll shoot you.'

And if they tresspassed anyhow because they were so smug and arrogant?

Count your lucky stars . Its a fundamental common law right to defend the home with force. Declare pig season open at you place.
 

gaiusmarius

me
Veteran
No what she should've done was sent her boyfriend to man school.
When the police are at the gate , he yells out the window ' you trespass , i'll shoot you.'

And if they tresspassed anyhow because they were so smug and arrogant?

Count your lucky stars . Its a fundamental common law right to defend the home with force. Declare pig season open at you place.

sorry but wouldn't they just go waco on you if you took a shot at a cop for stepping on your property, even after a warning, won't they say he was doing his duty in assisting the lawful eviction process when you maliciously took a pot shot bla bla bla....? i don't see such a scenario ending very well . once you shoot one of them their brains go out the window and all they want to do is kill you.
 
G

GeneralExecutor

... When the police are at the gate , he yells out the window ' you trespass , i'll shoot you.'

Count your lucky stars . Its a fundamental common law right to defend the home with force. Declare pig season open at you place.

As gaiusmarius said... waco:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Er7gzj0BbSE

That fundamental common law right to defend the home with THAT type of force nowadays gives them the right under International law to declare WABBIT SEASON on you. And if they start something, they have the guns to finish it.

Under Biblical law, not sure where it states thoust shall kill to defend thy's home from corporate trespassers?

... but...

... then again, what would we know. Would not be the first time our words have fallen on deaf ears.

:dance013:
 

isaih520

Member
Its a matter of principle.
Why these guys are so smug is because men do not act upon principle anymore but expedience.
If we acted on principle at all times they would not be coming in our homes looking to enforce drug prohibition policy.
Traitors don't risk their lives for their masters.
So no they wouldn't go WACO. They're not men of character, they're cowards. Bullies.
They would get back in their cars and leave. And find someone they can bully.

Joining the police is the cheapest , easiest access to power a man can have. It attracts the sort that lack any character.
The rare individual that might join who does have some, would leave within the first year.
These men are all show. Front. They're actors.

Bear in mind these men have no judicial function whatsoever.
Which they're fully aware of but hoping we are all brainwashed by TV to think they're government.

They're soliciting business. The try to get you in front of a court through conning you that they have the authorty as government or some kind of public function.
Its all bullshit. Even prior to the corporate takeover of the commonwealth it was bullshit.

If the court has a dejure warrant they send the sherriff to your house.
And the sherriff only. Not the sherriff and the police. Or the police on their own.

Thats the law for gods sake. They know it believe me.
Thats why it took them 2 hours to get her out of her house.
Because she kept saying no , and it was on camera.

I would bet that they didnt bring a warrant because no judge had the balls to sign one because this woman knows what they're doing.
If they had a warrant they would've brought it.

Besides if you're scared of them going WACO, thats precisely the reason you should start standing up for your rights.
We are not too far from tyranny when that posssibility isnt far fetched.

Tyranny doesnt go away when you pander to it.
 

gaiusmarius

me
Veteran
so what did our friend in Waco do wrong? you are saying they won't go nuts, but when the occupants in waco stood their ground and took shots at the cops for trespassing, waco was exactly what happened. i'm sure they thought they were within their rights and they probably were, but the problem is the guys with the bigger guns and bigger numbers also thought they had the right, so the result was a horrific murder of woman and children including burning a bunch of them in their bunker. so i would be careful about standing your ground with these militarized nutters working as police today.
 

SilverSurfer_OG

Living Organic Soil...
ICMag Donor
Veteran
Australia doesnt have the $ invested in para-military police like USA. Also David Koresh upset the 'authorities' selling guns... but brutal murder it most defo was. They pumped in flammable gas with 2 bulldozer type tanks and made it go bang by dropping some kind of flashbang grenade behind them.

The vid didnt work for me btw but sounds interesting.
 

greenbeen

Member
what would some key points in law that we can use to escape out of this unjust "government"
what words should we know the meaning of if we were to represent our selves?
also we know that there are different levels of jurisdiction but how would one get to use international law in a private law system?
 

greenbeen

Member
so I just got the claims of rights from that Quebec which was $500 now I just really need to get my shit straight and I feel that this freeman movement or what ever you wanna call it has good intentions behind it but I think that even tho we would be free we should still try and improve the corporation and make it turn the world into a better place and I believe as a freeman it would be our obligation to clash heads with them and come to make THEM understand what the true needs of there people want and desire other than money since we were all made to make this world better its not use it for our own greedy self which money guides people to do so and that is why we are corrupted
 

High Country

Give me a Kenworth truck, an 18 speed box and I'll
Veteran
No what she should've done was sent her boyfriend to man school.
When the police are at the gate , he yells out the window ' you trespass , i'll shoot you.'

And if they tresspassed anyhow because they were so smug and arrogant?

Count your lucky stars . Its a fundamental common law right to defend the home with force. Declare pig season open at you place.

Since when was it a fundamental right to defend the home with force?

Taking a shot at a police officer?...are you freaking mad. That will get you killed or a very long time in jail on attempted murder or murder.

I wouldn't be talking about committing serious criminal offences like that on this website.

You are a fool...grow up.
 
I am yet to be convicited.

I walked out of court twice on the issue, and another time with that issue floating around.

Yes you didn't get convicted because you didn't turn up in court for the hearing and then fled the jurisdiction, did the bolt in other words.
 

greenbeen

Member
there is only one way to be safe and that is to send in your claim of rights telling your government that you want to be treated like a human being and explaining that you are being help in servitude if your a citizen who is a subject to her majesty which slavery and servitude shall no longer exist in any forms
 
If this defence worked then why don't the top QC's, who get paid a lot of money to get people off, why don't they use it?
With all their qualifications and learning, you think they would know about it, especially lawyers who specialize in constitutional law.
 

greenbeen

Member
im not to sure I sent the document that I have to a lawyer to see where to send it to I will post the results of that and see what they say but I have called around and no one knows what a claim of right is I think that the lower level people don't really get told about this or they don't know even if it exists or not but I am in the process of being recognized as a human being be for a citizen and I think that's the main point we have to do first before you can actually have no laws well very few that put restrictions on pot and what not, it basically says since im a human I have the right to medical stuff even none prescribed so mary jane :) but I will keep my health card for a good relationship with the government so I am not abandoning them im just saying hey I don't need this but I will have it for your benefit and mine since my parents made me a citizen of canada
 

gaiusmarius

me
Veteran
Yes you didn't get convicted because you didn't turn up in court for the hearing and then fled the jurisdiction, did the bolt in other words.

if you read what he says, thats not what happened.

If this defence worked then why don't the top QC's, who get paid a lot of money to get people off, why don't they use it?
With all their qualifications and learning, you think they would know about it, especially lawyers who specialize in constitutional law.

according to the freeman ideas, the lawyers are not your friends and have a primary duty to the court, before any duty to the client. so thats why they say you have to represent yourself. if you use a lawyer you are automatically under their jurisdiction as you are looked at as a juvenile who can't look after his own affairs and is asking the court to provide their services according to all the regulations and statutes as well as the criminal law. thats the freeman theory anyway.
 

rantan

Member
freeman ideas, bloody marvelous! ...
but i cant find anything in this thread that proves or even illustrates the title of this thread "pot is lawful in Australia"

yet ive seen mountains of evidence that pot IS prohibited by law within Australia
 

High Country

Give me a Kenworth truck, an 18 speed box and I'll
Veteran
freeman ideas, bloody marvelous! ...
but i cant find anything in this thread that proves or even illustrates the title of this thread "pot is lawful in Australia"

yet ive seen mountains of evidence that pot IS prohibited by law within Australia

You are not wrong there...this thread is going nowhere.

All of these religious mad rants mean nothing to the Crimes Act...whether you like it or not that is the way it goes.
 

Hempsmoke

Active member
Hey
i tried to take this seriously till i have read

"Well that's what's happened but what everyone knew in our grandfathers day, that very few know today is that the catholic church is trying to take over the protestant countries.
Australia is a protestant country.

Somehow in 2 generations that knowledge has been forgotten. And the reason people are oblivious is because the catholic church has taken control of education and the media to fool us into believing the opposite to , or be completely oblivious to our grandparents beliefs."

This made me LOL really hard mate.

You are talking about stuff the catholic church did about 400 years ago, concluding its still the same, and forgetting that this your religion vs. my religion shizzle was just a tool for the political leaders to make the people fight against each other in order to expand their influence range.

As our grandparents knew, democratic leaders, more ofteh than not, use their democratcially obtained power for their own purposes.
This shows us the "democratic church" is evil and we all have to switch to the "communist church" in order to maintain our freedom....oh, wait...
 

isaih520

Member
Peasants.
Yes of course its your right and duty to protect the home.
Your home is your castle.
Well not yours maybe.
But it is in the law.
Its a very big deal to come onto your private property uninvited.
Its a crime as a matter of fact.

Its also a crime to obey unlawful government.

>>>>>>>>>edited to abide by the terms of use re name calling<<<<<<<<<<<<

And if that applies to you, please dont address me or respond to me.

for the rest of you who have the self possession to know in your gut that you can grow any damn thing you like because you're nobody's cattle, I'm happy to share / debate.

`
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top