What's new
  • Happy Birthday ICMag! Been 20 years since Gypsy Nirvana created the forum! We are celebrating with a 4/20 Giveaway and by launching a new Patreon tier called "420club". You can read more here.
  • Important notice: ICMag's T.O.U. has been updated. Please review it here. For your convenience, it is also available in the main forum menu, under 'Quick Links"!

Syria, chem weapons, assad or al qaida?

Status
Not open for further replies.

Storm Shadow

Well-known member
Veteran
Anybody who says Assad is a bad guys is an uneducated Moron who shouldn't comment on Middle Eastern Politics ...

Wait till the U.N General Assembly .. Putin is bringing all the proof that the Nutt job Sunni USA/Israel backed Rebels used the Sarin....

Syria has found paperwork from over 28 different nationals of Jihadist in their country...

American population by far is the most uneducated as a whole compared to the rest of the world... I guess it doesn't help when your country is dominated by a Zionist Agenda..

Funny a guy who speaks Spanish and Hebrew is going to tell me I don't understand Simple Farsi... And I guess everyone else must be lying because Israel is so honest... please don't make me yack all over myself

How easy the sheep forget
http://www.foreignpolicyjournal.com...-white-phosphorus-during-operation-cast-lead/

Israel’s Illegal Use of White Phosphorus During ‘Operation Cast Lead’
And How the U.S. Media Tries to Cover Up Israeli War Crimes

You cannot justify the Crimes Israel commits and all the turmoil they cause in order to get big brother to clean up their mess...

Israel shits in her pants when she sees 11 Warships in her backyard... Russians aren't playing games... Israel makes the wrong move and Putin will wipe that Parasitic regime off the map
 

Crusader Rabbit

Active member
Veteran
Whoa, speaking of layers of deception;
By Mitchell Prothero | McClatchy Foreign Staff

BEIRUT — A freelance contributor to the Associated Press whose byline appeared on a controversial story that alleged Syrian rebels had gassed themselves in an accident told McClatchy on Saturday that she did not write the article and has been seeking to have her name removed from it since it was published by a small Minnesota-based website.

Dale Gavlak, a long time contributor from the Middle East to for AP, released an email statement to McClatchy and several blogs denying any role in reporting the story, which was published Aug. 29 by Mint Press News, which describes itself with the phrase “independent advocacy journalism.” The article carried her byline along with that of Yahya Ababneh, a Jordanian Arab-language journalist.

The story likely would have gone unnoticed in pre-Internet days. But thanks to social media such as Twitter and Facebook, it’s become a crucial piece of evidence for those arguing that the rebels, not the government of Syrian President Bashar Assad, were most likely responsible for an Aug. 21 chemical attack in the Damascus suburbs.

Within hours of the story’s release, Mint Press’s website crashed from excessive traffic, and the story continues to be cited by conspiracy-minded websites and supporters of the embattled Assad government in the wake of a U.N. investigation whose findings, many say, implicate the Syrian military.

In a phone conversation on Saturday, Gavlak, whose AP connection is often held up as evidence of the reliability of the Mint Press story, confirmed the statement and described a timeline in which she had been trying for weeks to get Mint Press to remove her name from the story. Gavlak referenced her emailed statement in the interview, saying she could not go much beyond it for legal reasons.

"Mint Press News incorrectly used my byline for an article it published on August 29, 2013, alleging chemical weapons usage by Syrian rebels,” the statement reads. “Despite my repeated requests, made directly and through legal counsel, they have not been willing to issue a retraction stating that I was not the author.”

“Yahya Ababneh is the sole reporter and author of the Mint Press News piece,” the statement added. “I did not travel to Syria, have any discussions with Syrian rebels, or do any other reporting on which the article is based. The article is not based on my personal observations and should not be given credence based on my journalistic reputation.”

Because of the incident, Gavlak and at least one other contributor to Mint News have ended their relationships with the website, which was founded nearly two years ago by Mnar Muhawesh, who is in her mid 20s.

Muhawesh, who was described in a January 2012 story on the MinnPost website as the daughter of Palestinian immigrants who graduated from college with a degree in journalism, did not respond to requests for comment left on her cell phone and sent to her Twitter and email accounts.

However, she later released a statement in which she said Gavlak and Ababneh had both come under pressure to disavow the story.

“We are aware of the tremendous pressure that Dale and some of our other journalists are facing as a result of this story, and we are under the same pressure as a result to discredit the story,” the statement said. “We are unwilling to succumb to those pressures for MintPress holds itself to the highest journalistic ethics and reporting standards.”

Gavlak produced a series of emails detailing her unsuccessful attempt to have Mint News either clarify the article’s background or remove it from the site. The emails begin almost immediately after publication of the story on Aug. 29th and continued through the weekend until Sept. 2.

The initial email detailing the filing of the story – Gavlak admits to helping Ababneh convert his Arabic reporting into English – reads “Pls find the Syria story I mentioned uploaded on Google Docs. This should go under Yahya Ababneh’s byline. I helped him write up his story but he should get all the credit for this.”

After seeing the story published under her name and the amount of interest it was generating – in large part because of the credibility lent to it by her relationship with AP, which bills itself as the “world’s oldest and largest newsgathering organization” – Gavlak demanded her name be removed. Muhawesh refused.

"We will not be removing your name from the byline as this is an existential issue for MintPress and an issue of credibility as this will appear as though we are lying," Gavlak said Muhawesh responded.

The story remains on the website with a note that Gavlak “researched and wrote” the story.

Gavlak implied that the nearly three-week delay in her public repudiation of the claim that was due to legal advice and pressure from the AP to let the controversy over the story die down since the story, which was thinly sourced, was not picked up by any major media outlets.

In a statement to McClatchy, Paul Colford, AP’s director of media relations, declined to discuss details of AP’s internal discussions or with Gavlak about the story. But he said it was “obviously of paramount importance… that this was not seen as assigned, edited or distributed in anyway [by the Associated Press.] AP had absolutely nothing to do with it.”

Read more here: http://www.mcclatchydc.com/2013/09/21/202832/ap-freelancer-says-report-of-rebel.html#storylink=cpy
 

Storm Shadow

Well-known member
Veteran
Syria already has Advanced S-400 Air Defense System in place... They shot down a F-22 Raptor and knocked out a few Tomahawk Missiles.. Why do you think the Britts got so scared and backed off quick...you think they care about what their people think?

Those S-400 are capable of Turning Tel-Aviv into a parking lot if Israel is stupid enough to attack Syria again...which they already bombed what like 2-3 times this year alone?

China even has a Warship with Hundreds of Special Forces watching Everything in the Backyard of Syria... The Chinese will also back the Russians in any led attack
 

gaiusmarius

me
Veteran
the whole muslim world accepts that Ahmadinejad was mistranslated by the west on purpose, to further demonize him and Iran. if anyone should know. it be them. Iran has not attacked anyone for a very long time, they are no danger to anyone. they know it would be suicidal to attack Israel and Israel knows this too. but they like the idea of a weakened Iran, just like they were happy to have Iraq in a chaotic state and are supporting the destruction of the Syrian state. no one really gives a shit about chemical weapons, it's geo strategic. Assad is too independent, he was on their list of regimes to be toppled for quite a while now. just think back to the axis of evil speech spouted by the war criminal Bush. Syria was on his list even back then, so give me a break about chemical weapons.

the only parties that win by attacking Syria, is the military industrial complex and those invested in it. for the rest of humanity it just means more innocent lives lost, more mayhem and more chance of real terror attacks as revenge.

but even worse it will mean a state ruled by alkaida, woman will be back in the stone ages, schools, hospitals, fire stations police stations will all be a pile of rubble. meanwhile the bearded fanatics will be hunting anyone down who's dick isn't circumcised the right way or some equally absurd reason like what sect or god forbid other religion they belong to. it's gonna be so great, just like the free democratic paradise the US created in Libya, oh and Iraq of course, both first world nations turned into shit by democratic missiles and bombs of freedom.
 

Crusader Rabbit

Active member
Veteran
Syria already has Advanced S-400 Air Defense System in place...

Those S-400 are capable of Turning Tel-Aviv into a parking lot if Israel is stupid enough to attack Syria again...

So are these missiles ground to air defense missiles or ground to ground attack missiles? They can't be both.

Just from memory, isn't the air defense system S-300? And I thought Russia had a cargo ship on it's way to give Syria the components they needed to complete their system?
 

Storm Shadow

Well-known member
Veteran
http://www.army-technology.com/projects/s-400-triumph-air-defence-missile-system/

S-400 Triumph Air Defence Missile System, Russian Federation

The S-400 Triumph (NATO reporting name: SA-21 Growler) is an air defence missile system developed by Almaz Central Design Bureau of Russia. The new system replaced the S-300P and S-200 air defence systems of the Russian Army.
The S-400 was developed as an upgrade of the S-300 series of surface-to-air missile systems. The system entered service in April 2007 and the first S-400 was deployed in combat in August 2007. Russia set up four S-400 regiments defending national airspace in the Moscow region, the Baltic exclave of Kaliningrad, and the Eastern Military District.
The air defence units of Southern Military District are expected to be rearmed with advanced S-400 Triumph by the end of 2012. Over 20 battalions of S-400 Triumph will be delivered to the Russian armed forces by 2015. Russia plans to induct 56 S-400 battalions by 2020.
Russia intends to supply export versions of the S-400 Triumph system to the armed forces of China. Turkey also expressed interest in purchasing S-400 air defence systems during the IDEF 2009 exhibition.
S-400 Triumph features

"The system can engage all types of aerial targets including aircraft, unmanned aerial vehicles (UAV), and ballistic and cruise missiles within the range of 400km, at an altitude of up to 30km."
The S-400 Triumph air defence system integrates a multifunction radar, autonomous detection and targeting systems, anti-aircraft missile systems, launchers, and command and control centre. It is capable of firing three types of missiles to create a layered defence.
The system can engage all types of aerial targets including aircraft, unmanned aerial vehicles (UAV), and ballistic and cruise missiles within the range of 400km, at an altitude of up to 30km. The system can simultaneously engage 36 targets.
The S-400 is two-times more effective than previous Russian air defence systems and can be deployed within five minutes. It can also be integrated into the existing and future air defence units of the Air Force, Army, and the Navy.

S-400 Triumph missiles

The S-400 air defence missile system uses four new missile types in addition to the missiles of the S-300PMU system. The first missile inducted for the system was the 48N6DM (48N6E3). It is an improved variant of the 48N6M with powerful propulsion system. The missile can destroy airborne targets within the range of 250km.
The 40N6 missile of the S-400 has a claimed range of 400km and uses active radar homing to intercept air targets at great distances. It can be launched against AWACS, J-STARS, EA-6B support jammers and other high-value targets.

The S-400 Triumph also launches 9M96E and 9M96E2 medium range ground-to-air missiles. Designed for direct impact, the missiles can strike fast moving targets such as fighter aircraft with a high hit probability. The maximum range of the 9M96 missile is 120km.
Command and control

The 55K6E command and control system of the S-400 Triumph is based on the Ural-532301 mobile command post vehicle. The command post is equipped with LCD consoles to process the air space surveillance data of the individual batteries. It controls and monitors long-range surveillance radar, tracks airborne threats, prioritises the threats, and coordinates other batteries.
The system is also capable of exchanging data with other defence systems such as SA-12, SA-23, and S-300.
Radars

"The S-400 is two-times more effective than previous Russian air defence systems and can be deployed within five minutes."
The fire control and target tracking radar of the S-400 is the 92N6E (NATO Codename: Gravestone). The radar is based on the MZKT-7930 8x8 vehicle. The 96L6 Cheese Board 3D surveillance and tracking radar is optionally carried by the same vehicle when the S-400 battery is deployed autonomously.
The 91N6E Big Bird acquisition and battle management radar of the S-400 is based on the 8x8 trailer. The radar can detect and track aircraft, rotorcraft, cruise missiles, guided missiles, drones and ballistic rockets within the distance of 600km. It can simultaneously track up to 300 targets.
Launch vehicle

The SP85TE2 launchers are based on the BAZ-64022 6x6 tractor truck or MAZ-79100 series Transporter-Erector-Launcher (TEL) vehicle. The TEL vehicle can carry up to four launch tubes holding a mix of missiles.
 

Storm Shadow

Well-known member
Veteran
http://beforeitsnews.com/war-and-co...above-the-sky-of-northern-jordan-2448162.html

U.S. F-22 Raptor Jet Crashed Above the Sky of northern Jordan.

According to the Oklahoman newspaper Post, citing U.S. military sources that the F-22 Raptor crashed in the north of Jordan, sources tell about the possibility of shoot down the F-22 Raptor aircraft by a Syrian missile Syrian everything and happened near the Syrian border, while a military expert John Blu Reed told the newspaper that the shoot down of the F-22 Raptor confirmation that Syria has a defense system updated the S-300, S 400 missiles or rockets, l ‘U.S. expert also stated that U.S. relations – Russia will be even more strained if it is confirmed that Russia has provided to Syria missiles S 400.

On the other hand according to reports from the United States, according to the Los Angeles Times of America, the Syrian defense forces have shot down four missiles launched by the Americans type Tomahawk, sources tell us that it was the defense systems (Bentsr 1) anti-aircraft missiles that have made that American missiles struck, and centered in the middle, the sources of Washington state that four missiles were launched to test the degree of defense of the Syrian forces, the sources have also confirmed that one of the main reasons in stopping aggression against Syria is the overthrow of the American F-22 Raptor crashed yesterday in the north of Jordan, also also deal with the part of the Syrian air defense missiles to the four Tomahawk, remember that Jordan is still home to its territory five F-22, and this was one of the main reasons to postpone the trial of aggression against Syria.
 

Crusader Rabbit

Active member
Veteran
The way Wikipedia articles are written is a lot like posting on this website.

That Axis Of Evil speech was written by David Frum, the same cretin who recently wrote an anti cannabis article for CNN. The Cheney administration wanted to gin up support for an invasion of Iraq but thought that over-the-top demonizing of Iraq would show their hand. So Frum came up with the bright idea to include North Korea and Iran in the speech with Iraq as the Axis Of Evil to hide their true intentions.

What a noble move. Iranian youth had been moving towards wanting more openness and rapprochement with the west. They wanted more openness and freedom within their society. Iran really was on the verge of a great transition. Then GW Bush, leader of the world's greatest military power, the country that contrived and sponsored a 1953 coup which deposed Iran's democratically elected president and installed a Shaw who initiated a reign of internal terror and torture, called Iran The Axis Of Evil. Of course the people of Iran rallied around their leaders to defend their country and society from this threat. That speech set back the movement for social freedom in Iran in a big way.
 

Wiggs Dannyboy

Last Laugh Foundation
ICMag Donor
Veteran
To Storm Shadow's above post:

Your link: http://beforeitsnews.com/war-and-co...above-the-sky-of-northern-jordan-2448162.html, starts off with this little gem:

"Thanks to Doreid Mohamad for this post
(translated from arab to italian and then from italian to english, sorry if there are errors)"

That right there is reason for dismissal...any story that is apologizing for possible errors before even starting the story is worthless gobble-dee-gook. Any person who gives a shit about finding truth knows to avoid this kind of reporting. And its very obvious that you sir don't know to avoid this kind of reporting.
 

Storm Shadow

Well-known member
Veteran
To Storm Shadow's above post:

Your link: http://beforeitsnews.com/war-and-co...above-the-sky-of-northern-jordan-2448162.html, starts off with this little gem:

"Thanks to Doreid Mohamad for this post
(translated from arab to italian and then from italian to english, sorry if there are errors)"

That right there is reason for dismissal...any story that is apologizing for possible errors before even starting the story is worthless gobble-dee-gook. Any person who gives a shit about finding truth knows to avoid this kind of reporting. And its very obvious that you sir don't know to avoid this kind of reporting.
TxkSR3D.jpg



You like English better ? You can try hard Wiggz.... Truth hurts.. Your views put you on the Sheep side of the Fence friend

How many different languages can you speak? Translations don't always read as desired...but the point is made... I bet you speak only 1
 

Crusader Rabbit

Active member
Veteran
it wasn't bush it was wesley clark who recently leaked the 7 countries in 5 years plan.


There are several You Tube videos that have retired General Clark explaining this story. Clark visited the Pentagon soon after 9/11 (the 2001 9-11) and a distressed former associate showed him the document.
 

Storm Shadow

Well-known member
Veteran
http://americanfreepress.net/?p=7373

Petraeus Set Up By Israel

The establishment media tells a tangled tale about the scandal that forced the resignation of David H. Petraeus as Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) director. However, there are important details that shed new light on the matter compared to what the mainstream media has been reporting.

Many believe the scandal was a set-up designed to bring down the general precisely because he was a highly-placed figure standing in opposition to the push by Israel’s current rulers to engage the United States in a war against Iran.

Although previously a favorite of neoconservative supporters of Israel, Petraeus ended up on Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu’s ‘destroy’ list after the general testified before Congress on March 16, 2010, that U.S. interests and Israeli interests are not identical; Israel is a strategic burden, not an asset, to the United States; and Israeli policies endanger the lives of our troops.

The reaction to the candid remarks by Petraeus provides a revealing list of his critics. House Majority Leader Eric Cantor (R-Va.)—a personal friend of Netanyahu and a leading supporter of Israel—was outraged. Foreign Policy, a magazine of the Foreign Policy Association, whined that Petraeus was “hardening” U.S. policy toward Israel. Abe Foxman, national director of the Anti-Defamation League, issued a statement condemning Petraeus.
The web that entangled Petraeus also features a similar cast of interconnected individuals and institutions. When Petraeus took command of the troops in Iraq, the Jebsen Center for Counter-Terrorism at Tufts University—an incubator for counter-terrorist strategies—was cooperating closely with pro-Israeli policy groups such as the Hudson Institute, the American Israel Public Affairs Committee and the Project for the New American Century. The “other woman” in the Petraeus affair—Paula Broadwell (née Kranz)—just happens to have been deputy director of Jebsen. A West Point graduate, Mrs. Broadwell—a specialist in ‘black ops’—had participated in a summer cadet exchange program in Israel and even lived in a kibbutz. Notorious for his interest in younger women, Petraeus was a perfect target for a ‘honeypot’ operation. Broadwell insinuated herself into the general’s world by writing a bragging account of his extremely successful career. The scandal—it seems—was supposed to be unveiled before the election, perhaps intended to prevent President Barack Obama’s reelection, but backstage maneuvering prevented that from happening. However, the result has been that high-level opposition in Washington to Israel’s agenda has certainly been crippled with Petraeus’s ouster
 

Red Fang

Active member
Veteran
I did not read much, but I think we should have bombed the hell out of that P.O.S. Assad when he first started slaughtering his own people. I am not normally for war, in fact I don't think the US should have gotten involved in any of the wars it did. Except Syria, Libya, and Rwanda. He is disrupting the whole region forcing refuges to flee all over the place, radicals got a foothold because of him not in spite of him, and so his ticket to hell should have been punched a long time ago. I don't know how anyone can say we shouldn't get involved when he killed 110,000 people and probably would kill 3/4 of the population just to stay in power. I'd like to make a torch out of that piece of shit!
 

Wiggs Dannyboy

Last Laugh Foundation
ICMag Donor
Veteran
View Image


You like English better ? You can try hard Wiggz.... Truth hurts.. Your views put you on the Sheep side of the Fence friend

How many different languages can you speak? Translations don't always read as desired...but the point is made... I bet you speak only 1

No...I like facts better. And as hard as it is to find objective reporting on events, striving to find information that is as truthful as can be expected when dealing with opinionated humans, there are certain strategies one can employ to weed out the most likely bullshit. Avoiding BS reporting from less than respected internet "news" sites is one of the first strategies to use, and avoiding reporting that states from the get-go that there could be errors due to translation problems is another well advised strategy.

The number of languages that I speak is meaningless. My ability to discern bullshit information is important though. Now, I'm guessing by your post that you speak more than one language. Big frickin deal, your inability to weed out the BS information just means that you can be lied to in more than one language.

One important thing to look for when considering information and whether it is solid is to see what the source is, and whether they have something to lose or gain by lying. That's why journalism in the US is considered the "fourth estate," as in being the fourth branch of our government after the executive, legislative and judicial...journalists, although they are definitely prone to subjective reporting, are much less likely to spread lies like politicians and other more opnionated folks. Politicians and other folks with an agenda are much more likely to lie about this stuff.

I don't have a horse in this race at all. I can see both sides of the issue, and can see where both sides of the arab/israeli conflict have done bad and stupid shit. You, on the other hand, do have a horse in the race. For some reason, you find it important to support the rotten Syrian dictator. This causes you to accept information you find without putting it to the bullshit test, and causes you to call people names.

You sure do call people a lot of nasty names.
 

gaiusmarius

me
Veteran
I did not read much, but I think we should have bombed the hell out of that P.O.S. Assad when he first started slaughtering his own people. I am not normally for war, in fact I don't think the US should have gotten involved in any of the wars it did. Except Syria, Libya, and Rwanda. He is disrupting the whole region forcing refuges to flee all over the place, radicals got a foothold because of him not in spite of him, and so his ticket to hell should have been punched a long time ago. I don't know how anyone can say we shouldn't get involved when he killed 110,000 people and probably would kill 3/4 of the population just to stay in power. I'd like to make a torch out of that piece of shit!

maybe read a bit more then it might broaden your views. no government on earth will let it's self be deposed by armed insurrection, think the US would act any different if a bunch of patriots started saying they were gonna topple the gov and took shots at the riot squad sent to disperse them?

Assad would have stopped the rebels inside 2 weeks if the west and arab countries were not sending money and weapons to the rebels. saudi even sent a bunch of convicted criminals over there to fight assad promising them pardons for their crimes if they engaged Assad. this is not an internal revolution, it steered and supported from out side Syria.

bombing the hell out of him would have done nothing but kill a bunch more people then have already died so far. the only way to stop this war going further is for a total weapon embargo on both sides and both sides forced to go and talk in geneva. no more foreign fighters are sent in from the west and no more weapons for Assad from the russians. cut both parties off from their funding and weapons and they will be talking before you know it. Assad has clearly stated he is ready to allow opposition parties to be formed and stand against him in elections. thats all anyone can ask, let Syrians vote on who they want leading them.
 

Crusader Rabbit

Active member
Veteran
Storm Shadow, those two articles you posted were really interesting. I understand that the beforeitsnews operation is a low budget, minimally staffed operation that ran articles through a computer translator.

I did read a news report about a joint U.S., Israel missile test out in the Mediterranean Sea. I also read a comment somewhere that the U.S. had launched some missiles from Spain towards Syria which were shot down, and the U.S. pressured Israel to go along with the cover story of a Mediterranean Sea missile test to save face. The articles you've posted support this story, and also help explain why the U.S. diplomatic situation with Syria has appeared so haphazard, with threats of military strikes then sudden turn about and accommodation with Russian desires. For me, the picture seems to have come together here.

I discovered the website, Global Research just recently while looking into the Syria situation and investigating the possibility of false flag operations, and need to read more of what they have to say. This is very interesting. It would be a big embarrassment to the U.S. to launch a hundred cruise missiles at Syria and have Russia and Syria shoot them all down. Russia did send another missile cruiser to join its Mediterranean fleet. This has been very illuminating.


edit; Just thinking out loud here while I'm on a paranoid false flag kick; The Libyan Benghazi clusterfuck smeared both Hillary Clinton and Petraeus who headed the State Dept and CIA respectively. Supposedly the Benghazi compound was really a CIA facility and the State Dept and CIA were trying to assign blame upon each other for the mess. Just wondering what the real motivation and sponsorship of the attack was. Funny how the search for the perpetrators seems to have gone cold after announcing that they had good leads. Just thinking here. Spooky times.

.edit; remember that funky movie trailer about the life of Mohammed that was supposed to be for an actual movie that was never released? The movie that was produced with money connected to Israelis and supposedly inspired the protests that led to the Benghazi incident? The movie that actually wasn't but was produced by a guy who knew nothing about film making and got out of jail by having his court fines paid off by a mystery donor? The movie in which the actors were told they were filming scenes and dialogue that turned out to be for another purpose and the actors spoke out in protest afterwards? Guess I'm all spooked up here, but I'm liking the Likud Party less and less.

.
 
Last edited:

Green lung

Active member
Veteran
View Image


You like English better ? You can try hard Wiggz.... Truth hurts.. Your views put you on the Sheep side of the Fence friend

How many different languages can you speak? Translations don't always read as desired...but the point is made... I bet you speak only 1
.

That isn't even a real paper you half-wit lol no f-22 was shot down over syria.

Anybody actually read the story lol.




.



.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Latest posts

Latest posts

Top