Citizens Aux PD
Member
Personally, if I was going to be paying for 1200watts of anything, I would go with the HPS, depending on the space and ability to get rid of the hot air. A watt is a watt, and 1200 watts of HPS is going to give you far better results than 1200watts of CFL, again depending on your ability to keep the enviroment under control with the heat the lamps bring.
Another thing to consider is that any HPS light, uses roughly 10% more than its rating to power the ballast, so a 600watt lamp actually uses roughly 660watts.
EDIT
I see it's a closet grow. What are the dimensions of the closet?
Ed Rosenthal says "[FONT=Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif]Although fluorescents produce only about 75% of the light per watt that the HPS does, the amount of light usable by the plant is equal or probably higher with the fluorescents."
[/FONT]
[FONT=Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif][FONT=Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif]"Although the 150 watt HPS is a bit more efficient that the CFLs in total output, watt for watt the fluorescents provide as much useful light as the HPS lamp. Heat is another consideration. The HPS runs much hotter and emits more heat than the fluorescents."
[/FONT]He says it in this thread: [/FONT]https://www.icmag.com/ic/showthread.php?t=112217