What's new
  • Happy Birthday ICMag! Been 20 years since Gypsy Nirvana created the forum! We are celebrating with a 4/20 Giveaway and by launching a new Patreon tier called "420club". You can read more here.
  • Important notice: ICMag's T.O.U. has been updated. Please review it here. For your convenience, it is also available in the main forum menu, under 'Quick Links"!

Researchers Find Cannabis Now Six Billion Times Stronger than Previous

G

Guest 26753

Researchers Find Cannabis Now Six Billion Times Stronger than Previous

CHRISTCHURCH - Analysis made of the public speeches given by police officers over the past 50 years have concluded that the THC content of cannabis is now close to six billion times higher than it was in 1963.

The study, led by University of Canterbury psycholinguist Dr. Viktor Nilsson, searched over 20,000 police statements and documents for hard data about how much stronger cannabis was at time of writing when compared to a short number of years ago.

"Cannabis growers, being filthy, lying, cheating, murderous enemies of humanity, do not keep accurate year-on-year records of chemical analyses of their product, so we need to use other methods to estimate the current strength of cannabis," Dr. Nilsson explains.

"One of our team noticed that the police often point out how much stronger cannabis is now than it used to be. We figured that since the Police would probably have access to a greater variety of cannabis strains than anyone else in the country as well as the chemistry labs in which to perform accurate testing, they would be the ones to trust.

"So we looked at statements made by police officers in which they mention how much stronger cannabis is now than it was a given number of years ago.

"For example, a police sergeant in 1972 said that cannabis was now ten times stronger than it was in 1967 - that is, five years previously - because of new strains coming in from Asia. In 1978 a detective said that selective breeding techniques had made cannabis eight times stronger than it was five years ago. So that's eighty times stronger than it was in 1967.

"The next decade saw a similar increase and if you add them all up it means modern cannabis is around six billion times stronger than what we had in the early sixties. In fact, it seems that, on average, the strength of cannabis increases by around fifty percent every year."

The findings were so surprising that Dr. Nilsson had to enlist the help of a theoretical physicist, Professor John Hardie, to interpret them.

"There is now so much THC in the average strain of the cannabis sativa plant that only a tenth of one percent of it is even visible in the physical dimension. This plant is a thousand times bigger, a thousand times more massive, than it appears."

Hardie concedes that some of his fellows have expressed some cynicism about his theory: "Which rather implies that the police might have got their figures wrong, or exaggerated them for some reason."

Hardie points out that the theory that the cannabis plant is replicating itself into hundreds of metaphysical dimensions opens up new avenues for research. "At the current rate of THC increase, we can confidently predict that by the year 2100, simply lighting a joint anywhere on the Earth's surface will release so much THC that the entire world will be stoned for a week. Even if they don't inhale.

"Already by next decade it should be at the point where your getting stoned also makes a hundred thousand versions of you in parallel universes stoned. So perhaps anyone smoking a joint should not only be at risk for cannabis possession, but also supply, kidnapping, criminal mass stupefaction and a host of other offences."

Dr. Nilsson said that the findings demanded a certain level of caution around future approaches to cannabis policy.

"We know that the Police estimate that every kilogram of cannabis does $10,000 worth of social harm to New Zealand. Well, if this modern superskunk is a billion times stronger than even pure THC, a few kilograms of it could cause New Zealand itself to sink into the sea."

When asked what he thought of the research, local Senior Sergeant Greg Smithers said that anyone doubting the veracity of the Police's figures "ought to think of the children," and not ask questions that might undermine the morale of drug squad officers.

- See more at: http://www.alcp.org.nz/vote2014/node/262#sthash.2yCkNbgs.dpuf
 
G

Guest 26753

Great article from the Aotearoa Legalise Cannabis Party (ALCP) - a political party, registered with the Electoral Commission to contest Parliamentary Elections in New Zealand.
 

unregistered190

Senior
Veteran
I will have to google "exponential function". Sounds about the same. If scientists could only increase the nutritional value of plants like that......the world would be set?
 
S

Sat X RB

Thankyou Moose for a humourous interlude in the Theatre of the War on Drugs!

I note the central researcher is a something-or-other Linguist ... which allows me to point to the indisputable fact that Language is the Vehicle of Culture. change a society's Language and you change its Culture.

so in a nutshell the Researcher is saying: whether consciously or not Authority is trying to change Culture to it's own anti-cannabis viewpoint. (my bet is UNCONSCIOUS!)

cheers, Cobber!
 

HOPS5K

Lover of Life
Veteran
Hardie concedes that some of his fellows have expressed some cynicism about his theory: "Which rather implies that the police might have got their figures wrong, or exaggerated them for some reason."

Oh, really?
 
G

Guest 26753

I note the central researcher is a something-or-other Linguist ... which allows me to point to the indisputable fact that Language is the Vehicle of Culture. change a society's Language and you change its Culture.

Actually, he is a cunnilinguist :)
 

rabid

Member
Smoking Moose, you're a dirty boy :laughing:

I was going to keep it a bit cleaner and say "cunning linguist" but you (and James Bond) beat me to it :biggrin:
 
G

Guest 26753

Bring it on!!

RStongue.jpg
 
S

Slip Kid

Wow, I hope NZ doesn't sink!! I'm too busy murdering and raping people to worry though...:)Wow I can hardly believe somebody had the audacity to put that info anywhere.Boggles the mind, the ways of politics.One kilogram of a politician is enough to sink a continent I guess.:tiphat:
 

BOMBAYCAT

Well-known member
Veteran
So where can I get some of that stuff? Don't they have something better to do than make up things?
 

resinryder

Rubbing my glands together
Veteran
When asked what he thought of the research, local Senior Sergeant Greg Smithers said that anyone doubting the veracity of the Police's figures "ought to think of the children," and not ask questions that might undermine the morale of drug squad officers.


I do think of the children. Every time a bust goes down and they remove the children to put into social service I think they should be with their parents. When the come in and shoot a parent I think of the children. Every time they incarcerate a parent I think about the children. Every time some cocksuckin cop says that an op with 40 plants is a million dollar a year op I feel sorry for his children cause they have a fucking dumbass for a dad.
 

Latest posts

Latest posts

Top