What's new
  • Happy Birthday ICMag! Been 20 years since Gypsy Nirvana created the forum! We are celebrating with a 4/20 Giveaway and by launching a new Patreon tier called "420club". You can read more here.
  • Important notice: ICMag's T.O.U. has been updated. Please review it here. For your convenience, it is also available in the main forum menu, under 'Quick Links"!

Does your emotional state symbiotic with the feeling people get using your product?

Does your emotional state symbiotic with the feeling people get using your product?


  • Total voters
    40

Aeroguerilla

I’m God’s solider, devil’s apostle
Veteran
hahaha i am laughing at the fact that you guys disrespect one of the greatest growers in the game. piff master weird i bet grows 10x better herb then all you shit talkin pole smokers. so get off weirds dick and grow your own
 

Stoner4Life

Medicinal Advocate
ICMag Donor
Veteran
That's a fair question so I will respond.

I know people in real life who are as delusional as WEIRD and believe in this witchcraft mysticism bs.

Just put this out as a thermometer on how many crazies we have around here....thus the poll. :)

scoffing @ mysticism and such???

thas some bad juju dude.......
 

Weird

3rd-Eye Jedi
Veteran
So you get to dictate how many adjectives I require to disagree with you? I notice you ignored my question about how I "attacked your person", isn't that convenient?:dance013:

[FONT=Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif]You are evidently convinced that you can ascertain more about a person by looking at their herb than I could in a single session of psychoanalysis, which irks me due to it's arrogance. One or two of the assumptions you listed could be accurate, but you can't know for sure! Unscientific hippy bullshit, sorry![/FONT]

im arrogant and talking unscientific hippy bullshit because I see a reflection of a persons being in their work and in what they choose as medicine?

Prove my logic wrong with a new set of logic, simply say you disagree or prove your point with science. Calling me arrogant and hippy dippy cause I have an opinion is offensive


Thank you for that entirely unnecessary explanation. I find it interesting that you perceive this to be infighting/argument and I consider this to be a debate, possibly the reason you are perceiving personal attacks and I'm seeing only logical discrepancies.:tiphat:

This is getting off topic, I'll happily continue to run circles around you in this poor excuse for a debate via PM if you'd like, or you could stop flogging a dead horse:deadhorse (It's odd, I've had to use that metaphor twice in the last few days) and let others share their opinions on the topic rather than jumping down the throat of the masses who are unwilling to accept yours:tumbleweed:

id prefer you run circles around the logic i presented originally and it would be an economy of verbiage at this point.

So many of my "fans" take so much time talking about everything BUT the logic i present

lol
 

macdiesel

Member
hahaha i am laughing at the fact that you guys disrespect one of the greatest growers in the game. piff master weird i bet grows 10x better herb then all you shit talkin pole smokers. so get off weirds dick and grow your own

Keep laughing. If you find the time, please respond to my PM I sent you a few months ago.

scoffing @ mysticism and such???

thas some bad juju dude.......

I believe in spiritualism and the spiritual world.

It is much stronger than I and not to be trifled with.

Feel the love in my energy. :ying:
 

MildeStoner

Active member
Veteran
Okay, this is going nowhere, I feel as if I have presented numerous logical arguments that are in disagreement with your original hypothesis (as have others in this thread), you just seem unwilling to accept them for some reason.

I'm not saying that you can't see a reflection of someone in their work, but I am saying that what you assume from a situation like this could not be considered factual or scientific data, these so called observations are not the (psychic) truths you are dressing them up as.

I called you arrogant because you claim to be able to ascertain more about a grower from perusing a sample of his/her work than many trained psychologists can in a full hour of interaction with clients. Thinking you can understand what motivates or drives someone like this, to me, is preposterous.

Anyway, I'm wasting my finger energy, you are evidently so convinced you're right that anything I say washes right away, water off a weird duck's back...

piff master weird i bet grows 10x better herb then all you shit talkin pole smokers. so get off weirds dick and grow your own
Personal insults coupled with homosexual/sexist slurs. Lovely.
I don't care if he grows good herb, that's got nothing to do with the topic at hand.
I'm not afraid to tell a baker I disagree with his opinion about the accuracy of assumtions, even is he makes better cakes than me, dig?

Even highly skilled individuals are wrong sometimes.
 

macdiesel

Member
Personal insults coupled with homosexual/sexist slurs. Lovely.
I don't care if he grows good herb, that's got nothing to do with the topic at hand.
I'm not afraid to tell a baker I disagree with his opinion about the accuracy of assumtions, even is he makes better cakes than me, dig?

Even highly skilled individuals are wrong sometimes.

Not to mention being bat-shit crazy and a good grower isn't mutually exclusive. ;)
 

Weird

3rd-Eye Jedi
Veteran
Okay, this is going nowhere, I feel as if I have presented numerous logical arguments that are in disagreement with your original hypothesis (as have others in this thread), you just seem unwilling to accept them for some reason.

you feel as you have but you simply laughed off everything i stated, you didn't cite even anecdotal evidence of why you feel the way you do.

it is o.k. to have varying opinion but its egotistic to think your opinion is more personally relevant to me than my own.

I'm not saying that you can't see a reflection of someone in their work, but I am saying that what you assume from a situation like this could not be considered factual or scientific data, these so called observations are not the (psychic) truths you are dressing them up as.
First I did not make a case for it being science anywhere here, it was purely experiential observation. Sounds like your manufacturing my stance and attacking me based on your own delusional observations.

I called you arrogant because you claim to be able to ascertain more about a grower from perusing a sample of his/her work than many trained psychologists can in a full hour of interaction with clients. Thinking you can understand what motivates or drives someone like this, to me, is preposterous.
Once again your fail miserably at reading comprehension

I said what you can understand about a person from a sample of their work is profound, what kind of troll are you to make it more than that?

Yeah I understand a person's motivations in regards to how they grow why they grow and the type of person they are relative to growing

I never made it bigger than that, your inexperience coupled with your imagination did


Anyway, I'm wasting my finger energy, you are evidently so convinced you're right that anything I say washes right away, water off a weird duck's back...
no dude your just another troll with very little real life experience dealing with other growers and their work who is so sure of how things work in your world that it applies to everyone

lots of that small minded shit going on here
 

MildeStoner

Active member
Veteran
Another post fraught with assumptions, no longer surprised to be honest.

very little real life experience dealing with other growers and their work
It literally makes me laugh out loud that after all this, you are still willing to jump to the most random conclusions about me and my life hahahahah

no dude your just another troll who is so sure of how things work in your world that it applies to everyone
I removed the assumptions from your statement about me and was left with exactly how I feel about you. We're not that different, aside from that one, huge factor. Oh, more irony, joy! (And I tend to be a little more eloquent when I present my opinion:D).

First I did not make a case for it being science anywhere here
Then why get upset when people say it's pseudoscience? (or hippy bullshit, as I like to call it:))

Once again your fail miserably at reading comprehension

I said what you can understand about a person from a sample of their work is profound, what kind of troll are you to make it more than that?
Your post number #37 in this thread is what made me feel the need to call bullshit, I think that it is unrealistic to think one can ascertain that much information about someone's motivations and personality types, etc from looking at marijuana.
But I've said all of this before..

I feel as I'm banging my head against a wall now, we are not going to see eye to eye on this, that seems certain.

Perhaps you just don't follow my logic, or see the arguments that I feel I have presented in contrary to your original hypothesis.

But no matter,
I grow tired of this.

Let us agree to disagree and move on...

All the best,
Milde
 

Galactic

Member
if the psychologists spend their hours as 'learned' as you... they wouldn't discern shit in that hour either

be well too
 

mrcreosote

Active member
Veteran
Lol,
looks at nug in a bag...Hmmm...Botswana Ballsac...

smells...Ah, yes...Peruvian bat guano...'08...maybe '09...

puff...Ah, yes...Blonde....5'8"...has hammertoes and some severe mother issues.

...and his girlfriend is making it with the mailman.

Lest you think I'm being overly tough on you, Wierd:

"How you grow, how you treat your plants, why you grow, the pride you take, the selections you make, your motivations for all the things you do all bias the equation and it also says alot about you as a human being

more profoundly than most people can imagine thus the incapacity to understand them"
__________________

That to me, with other comments, say this is not conjecture on your part but a demonstrable fact followed by a condescending statement that anyone who dare disagree suffers from a diminished intellect or...ahem, sensitivity.

I mean, I have every right in the world to claim that I am the *best* world's fattest ballerina but not to say that anyone who disagrees just doesn't know a damn thing about ballet.

But for a positive note, I'll say it's a wise man who knows himself and you definitely are Wierd.
 
Last edited:

TPIMP

Member
i think there def is a connection between grower and plant, the way the plant was grown reflects the energy that was put into it. so smoking its nugs passes this energy onto the smoker. i don't know if there is something on a higher level than this like transferring emotions from grower to plant to nug, but i dont find it impossible honestly.
i like to see things as how they are but i know there will always be something that cannot be explained by science.
For now, as we exist, in our existence, I don't think people can have such a level of spirituality to be able to grow weed that is that good, that could transfer the growers essence and emotions to the smoker.
 

Latest posts

Latest posts

Top