This just in.... kids die in 5-gal buckets.... make more guns.... film at 11
Maybe we could put loaded guns beside those bucket and...
Maybe we could put loaded guns beside those bucket and...
Has anyone invented this yet?
- Thread starter med_breeder
- Start date
R
ran outta love
Why is it important to you that other people can shoot your gun?
The only reason I would ever see myself getting a gun is for hunting, and there's really no value for something like this in a hunting gun as it's not like a deer is going to grab your gun and shoot you. So I doubt they would be ever added to them.
But if the gun might be used in close combat situations, say if I was a cop or a robber, I would see value in a feature like this for sure.
As a general safety measure it's a horrible idea. Unless they make the entire gun computer controlled removing the safety will be child's play, literally, and therefore leaving the gun around kids would still be a recipe for disaster. Store guns in a locked closet and teach the kids to respect them.
now you are talkin!!! if ya kept a pistol right next to one,and you saw baby upside down in the bucket...BAM just pop a hole in the bucket,save a life...good idea Disco
R
ran outta love
Haha. Reminds me of the Simpsons episode where Homer gets a gun.
I think I saw that..did they not have a problem with the ring placement not allowing the weapon to fire ???
The best way to stop kids accidentally killing themselves with guns is to not have them, failing that, it doesnt take a genius to realise that a secure metal cabinet or even a safe is essential.
500 kids a year die due to firearm accidents.
2,542 kids die each year in auto accidents.
Half of those automobile deaths could be prevented with seat belts and or proper restraints.
How about you invent a way to stop stupid people from letting their kids ride in a car without using seat belts?
2,542 kids die each year in auto accidents.
Half of those automobile deaths could be prevented with seat belts and or proper restraints.
How about you invent a way to stop stupid people from letting their kids ride in a car without using seat belts?
med_breeder
Active member
I was simply asking if a safety device was invented or not.
I have no political slant.
I was just curious.
Feel free to use this thread to discuss other inventions.
I am sure there are alot of creative people here.
So please let there be peace in this thread.
I was just asking about a special type of biometric lock.
Peace.
I have no political slant.
I was just curious.
Feel free to use this thread to discuss other inventions.
I am sure there are alot of creative people here.
So please let there be peace in this thread.
I was just asking about a special type of biometric lock.
Peace.
high_hopes
Member
If there's a way to make it, there's a way to break it.
high_hopes
Member
Totally off topic dude.
unless the modification was foolproof i would never own one. just one more thing to go wrong when you need it most
R
ran outta love
Good point.
My words in your sig... dont know, good or bad but I'm flattered.
It iwas sarcasm at its' highes degree but appropriate for the govt we have in place. Ron Paul.
"becasue, my twin" <what dat?
Judge Dredd.. yes they had that type gun.
You are worried about 500 deaths, I am worried about 2,500 deaths.
Sorry for partying.
The cost added to each firearm would be prohibitive.
I imagine that this device would be battery operated. That right there is a problem. My gun sits untouched for sometimes longer than a year. I can't call a timeout to put in new batteries if something happens. I wouldn't want a very reliable .357 magnum to be disabled by a malfunctioning safety device or a bad battery.
I recently read an article that advocated putting a safety device on saws to stop people from cutting their fingers off.
http://www.businessweek.com/magazine/content/11_25/b4233032712156.htm (this is not the op-ed I read, it is a different article)
4,000 people a year lose fingers to table saws.
I do not see why I should have to pay $100 for a safety feature added to a tool that cost me about $100.
I understand there are inherent risks associated with using a table saw. I understand that a table saw could potentially kill me.
I can live with that, or pay someone else to cut wood for me.
I would not like to see something mandated that would add so much cost and make weapons unreliable.
I could see it used in some situations, but would hate to see something like this mandated.
It might also cause people to become even less safe with firearms. If you only had experienced a firearm that wouldn't fire when you tried to touch it off, you might fire an unsecured weapon accidentally.
Sorry for partying.
The cost added to each firearm would be prohibitive.
I imagine that this device would be battery operated. That right there is a problem. My gun sits untouched for sometimes longer than a year. I can't call a timeout to put in new batteries if something happens. I wouldn't want a very reliable .357 magnum to be disabled by a malfunctioning safety device or a bad battery.
I recently read an article that advocated putting a safety device on saws to stop people from cutting their fingers off.
http://www.businessweek.com/magazine/content/11_25/b4233032712156.htm (this is not the op-ed I read, it is a different article)
4,000 people a year lose fingers to table saws.
I do not see why I should have to pay $100 for a safety feature added to a tool that cost me about $100.
I understand there are inherent risks associated with using a table saw. I understand that a table saw could potentially kill me.
I can live with that, or pay someone else to cut wood for me.
I would not like to see something mandated that would add so much cost and make weapons unreliable.
I could see it used in some situations, but would hate to see something like this mandated.
It might also cause people to become even less safe with firearms. If you only had experienced a firearm that wouldn't fire when you tried to touch it off, you might fire an unsecured weapon accidentally.
for the OP
http://www.wired.com/science/discoveries/news/2004/04/63066
old news link using RFID tags for operator verification
http://www.wired.com/science/discoveries/news/2004/04/63066
old news link using RFID tags for operator verification
G
Guest 88950
just because an idea is unique enough to warrant a new patent dosent mean it is a good idea or maketable and just b/c an idea is good dosent mean it will be profitable or accepted by the target market.
when allen breed invented the actuator / ignitor for airbags he was ignored by the automotive industry b/c they felt that the consumers werent worried about the potential benefits of air bags in cars. now it would be hard to imagine a new car w/o airbags.
OP, feel free to pm me with any questions regarding your question and patents related to what your describing.
and for those who disagree.......continue with the neg rep. i guess i shouldnt assume you possess the ability articulate anything.
when allen breed invented the actuator / ignitor for airbags he was ignored by the automotive industry b/c they felt that the consumers werent worried about the potential benefits of air bags in cars. now it would be hard to imagine a new car w/o airbags.
OP, feel free to pm me with any questions regarding your question and patents related to what your describing.
and for those who disagree.......continue with the neg rep. i guess i shouldnt assume you possess the ability articulate anything.
I'm sure that somebody has already mentioned that there are biometric and fingerprint locks available. And they aren't really very expensive either, as far as safe's and locks go.
http://www.amazon.com/LockSafe-PBS-...9C2K/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&qid=1323283906&sr=8-1
http://www.amazon.com/LockSafe-PBS-...9C2K/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&qid=1323283906&sr=8-1
invent a gun that will not commit a crime!
this is a parody.
for all intents and purposes (not directed at anyone, hehe) a gun that must have input before being able to be discharged. fill out a form, fire up the generator, input data, verify data, arm, aim, discharge...
or a smart bullet, only injures/kills if danger exists...
or fires five gallon buckets...
or marshmallows.
this is a parody.
for all intents and purposes (not directed at anyone, hehe) a gun that must have input before being able to be discharged. fill out a form, fire up the generator, input data, verify data, arm, aim, discharge...
or a smart bullet, only injures/kills if danger exists...
or fires five gallon buckets...
or marshmallows.
G
Guest 88950
the person commits the crime.......the gun is the instrument of fear.
lol......i vote for the marshmallow gun.
