DAMN I just saw a small flying drone on TV used by cops

[grozzef]

man this is just the tip of the iceburg. everything in msm movies is specifically placed and most of the crazy hollywood tech/effects are just ways to hide things out in the open and discredit potential witness's before they even speak about shit. Just fuckin imagine trying to go up to some random ass at mcdonalds and telling them the gov is multiple generations ahead of us has spaceships, and works alongside et's lol. built in security, who here hasn't seen some kind of alien propaganda movie. i just don't get how people can't do the simple math to get that theres something way bigger going on than what the tv is telling them. Sorry don't mean to rant, been hittin the oil too hard this mornin.

 

[Max Headroom]

Seriously when are they going to stop all this shit and get on to the real business of saving the planet that they have fucked up so well.

"Unfortunately, catastrophes or scandalous disclosures always have to happen before humanity realizes that it is only its own mistakes that have led it into misfortune. these are all the more difficult to rectify, because in the main they have been made by the authorities, who will not commit suicide themselves, but in order to save their own skins, they would rather that all life should perish before they acknowledge their errors."
--Viktor Schauberger, 1934

 

[wiesseweed]

the next step is video cameras inside your car while you drive. they will do this under the guise of ensuring that you pay your tolls.

 

[headband 707]

Fuck em. I'm ready...

Holy shit I laughed when I saw this one lol too funny .. yeah your ready lol peace out Headband 707

 

[MJBadger]

My friend had a drone over his manor for around 3wk . Wing span about 4ft & flying round 100ft high . It was doing a box circuit 2 time then moved 10ft or so over on the next circuit . We were in his garden looking at all his plants in the border next to the fence when it flew over & i`m bloody sure i could just make out a camera on it`s belly . Some where nearby was a van with POPO in it controlling it by a laptop .
I told him what is was but he seemed convinced it was just some survey or mapping being done . 2mth later a bunch of heavy popo are banging on his door at 6 in the morn .
There were around another dozen or so people in his manor to get busted all within a short period . A lot of the busts were indoor growers a few outdoor so i`m sure the drone was equipped with infa red heat seeking equitment as well as camera .

I reckon a helicopter gunship is the only way of getting rid of them .

 

[dddaver]

So cool. I'm gonna invest in a high powered potato gun. Fun and functional augment our hobbies.

 

[mrcreosote]

Relax guys,

I pretty much control The New World Order from my garage.

We don't want you or your children...
We need time for the GMO corn to do it's work on your grand-kids.

Then once we get the nano-bots in their brain, it's a done deal.

Chuck Norris will produce 'The Real Housewives of FEMA Camp 5'.
We even got Bono to lead the sing-a-long at next years Bohemian Grove retreat.

 

[SuperConductor]

the next step is video cameras inside your car while you drive. they will do this under the guise of ensuring that you pay your tolls.

Mate they already have that planned/underway in case you fall asleep at the wheel. It'll be directly connected to emergency services via your satnav so they can find you easily lol

Don't know about the US but most of UK motorway network is covered by automatic numberplate recognition and police cars have it too. They don't even need to target you it just tells them they need to stop you and tell you to renew your insurance etc

Good to know these things so we know what not to do in order to stay free but there's no point getting paranoid

 

[downtoearth]

LMAO

LMAO

Right. I promise if I saw anything like this over my property, I would shoot it down without even hesitating. It's against privacy rights. Imagine the fallout if somebody's wife was nude sunbathing or fucking his old lady in the back yard on the patio. Read this article. There are numerous legal reasons why this isn't and never will be legal. http://www.pressdemocrat.com/article/20110623/articles/110629728

Yes, I'm sure they will try it until we fight back with law and then it will end. They push the envelope and often get away with dumb shit like this. But only for a while. So, don't worry all. Just shoot it. I imagine they will get pissed off at having to replace them. I want them to try on my property because I appreciate "fruit from the poisonous tree" laws. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fruit_of_the_poisonous_tree

 

[headband 707]

Right. I promise if I saw anything like this over my property, I would shoot it down without even hesitating. It's against privacy rights. Imagine the fallout if somebody's wife was nude sunbathing or fucking his old lady in the back yard on the patio. Read this article. There are numerous legal reasons why this isn't and never will be legal. http://www.pressdemocrat.com/article/20110623/articles/110629728

Yes, I'm sure they will try it until we fight back with law and then it will end. They push the envelope and often get away with dumb shit like this. But only for a while. So, don't worry all. Just shoot it. I imagine they will get pissed off at having to replace them. I want them to try on my property because I appreciate "fruit from the poisonous tree" laws. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fruit_of_the_poisonous_tree

This would be a very interesting thing to look into but I bet your bottom dollar you would lose lol
They would make up some bullshit that they have the right to defend the territory and on and on. I think the best move is some type of descrambler if that is at all possible. Headband707

 

[AOD2012]

This would be a very interesting thing to look into but I bet your bottom dollar you would lose lol
They would make up some bullshit that they have the right to defend the terriory and on and on. I think the best move is some type of descrambler if that is at all possible. Headband707

Yea headband you got it right. The government is going to continue bending every law they make in order to get what they want. And as soon as other people catch on to it, they make another law, and fuck you even harder.



aod

 

[NiteTiger]

Right. I promise if I saw anything like this over my property, I would shoot it down without even hesitating. It's against privacy rights. Imagine the fallout if somebody's wife was nude sunbathing or fucking his old lady in the back yard on the patio. Read this article. There are numerous legal reasons why this isn't and never will be legal. http://www.pressdemocrat.com/article/20110623/articles/110629728

Yes, I'm sure they will try it until we fight back with law and then it will end. They push the envelope and often get away with dumb shit like this. But only for a while. So, don't worry all. Just shoot it. I imagine they will get pissed off at having to replace them. I want them to try on my property because I appreciate "fruit from the poisonous tree" laws. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fruit_of_the_poisonous_tree

Just so you know, all of that means nothing in regards to an overflight of any kind.

You only have rights to about ~500 ft. (variable, in some places it is as low as 150ft) of airspace over your property. Anything over that is public, and therefore, no warrant is needed to be in that airspace. That's why they can use choppers to hunt gardens from the air without a warrant. Choppers or planes, dirigibles or drones, all legal in the air above your property.

Since they do legally have a right to be there, then anything they see from that vantage point is legally admissible, and is NOT the fruit of a poisonous tree. In fact, it's the seed of a VERY usable tree.

For your links to apply, the craft would need to be under ~500 ft, and if they're under 500 ft @ your house, they're landing, not taking pictures

Oh, and nowhere in the Constitution or Bill of Rights does it list a right to Privacy.

 

[dddaver]

"Gee, my potato hit your remote controlled plane? I'm sorry. What were you doing there anyway? WHAT? Spying on US citizens on US soil?...Wait a minute..."

 

[headband 707]

They have already proven that locking ppl up for cannabis doesn't work

They have already proven that locking ppl up for cannabis doesn't work

Not sure if anyone gets these shows called the "Boarder Wars" Holy Shit what bullshit that is.. What a waste of taxpayers cash going after cannabis. How much money does our Gov spend on that little baby?... The people that get caught up in these dragnets as mulls and get sent to prison for the rest of there lives.. Old ladies and old men and kids they can't see they are being threatened with their lives ? Geez these boarder guys really need to get a grip here...Realize that cannabis is just that and all the jail in the world is not going to stop people from doing it and no one is going to make money locking people up. They have already proved that locking people up for cannbis doesn't work.. This is why the law will not pass in Canada ,,So why make people suffer needlessly? peace out Headband707

 

[Max Headroom]

this is on topic:

America’s Secret Empire of Drone Bases: Its Full Extent Revealed for the First Time
A ground-breaking investigation examines the most secret aspect of America's shadowy drone wars and maps out a world of hidden bases dotting the globe.
http://www.alternet.org/world/15275...ent_revealed_for_the_first_time_/?page=entire

apparently the USSA already has 60+ drone bases around the world...

makes you all warm and fuzzy inside, don't it...

especially when you read spine-chilling shit like:

"...the next step toward a future in which drones will “hunt, identify, and kill the enemy based on calculations made by software, not decisions made by humans.”

i know the ol' SKYNET comparision is getting tiresome, but what the hell - this IS fucking skynet! once the "software" is told that "enemies" aren't just 3rd world civilians but also protesters, pot-farmers, etc...

they'll probably call the operation #OccupyMassGraves


fuck, somebody needs to pull the plug on this batshit crazy empire...

 

[Guest 16149]

Hmm they might have their own issues

U.S. drones under attack from virus
13Comments.more +EmailPrintAdd to FavoritesDel.icio.usDiggHacker NewsLinkedInRedditTechnorati..By Kara Reeder
October 17, 2011, 8:38 AM PDT
Takeaway: Kara Reeder reports on the virus threat to the U.S. drone fleet. Find out what the Air Force and security experts are saying about it.

According to WIRED News, America’s fleet of Predator and Reaper drones have been hit by a computer virus that logs pilots’ every keystroke. While a source familiar with the infection, which was discovered several weeks ago, says the virus is considered “benign,” network security specialists can’t seem to wipe it from the computers at Creech Air Force Base in Nevada.

It is unclear exactly how the keylogger came to reside on the drones’ systems, whether it was intentional or accidental. There is the possibility that it’s just a common piece of malware that “just happened” to find its way into the systems. Wired blogger Noah Shachtman says the virus is believed to have spread through removable drives, which Predator and Reaper crews use to load map updates and transport mission videos from one computer to another. Regardless, it has been resistant to numerous attempts to remove it.

It also is unclear just how far the virus has spread, although it is certain that it has infiltrated both classified and unclassified machines at Creech, raising the possibility that secret data may have been captured and leaked to someone outside the military chain of command. However, the virus is not keeping the drones grounded, reports Reuters, as they continue to fly remote missions overseas.

Unsurprisingly, the Air Force is remaining tight-lipped about the incident, releasing this statement posted by msnbc.com:

We do not discuss specific vulnerabilities, threats, or responses to our computer networks, since that helps people looking to exploit or attack our systems to refine their approach. We invest a lot in protecting and monitoring our systems to counter threats and ensure security, which includes a comprehensive response to viruses, worms, and other malware we discover.

That response isn’t likely to quell the concerns of some security experts like Richard Stiennon, chief research analyst with IT-Harvest in Birmingham, Mich. Stiennon told PCWorld.com:

This is bad in so many ways. It indicates that the military is using completely insecure operating systems and practices for the critical function of controlling drones …These are deadly weapons that must work as required and only when required. To have their command and control corrupted by apparently common malware is inexcusable.

.Get IT Tips, news, and reviews delivered directly to your inbox by subscribing to TechRepublic’s free newsletters.

 

[downtoearth]

And when they are picking up the small fragments of what is left of their little drone, I'll tell them "oopsie" I didn't bring out my tape measure to get the exact feet in which it was flying. I thought I was under attack by aliens, lol

 

[downtoearth]

lol

lol

Just so you know, all of that means nothing in regards to an overflight of any kind.

You only have rights to about ~500 ft. (variable, in some places it is as low as 150ft) of airspace over your property. Anything over that is public, and therefore, no warrant is needed to be in that airspace. That's why they can use choppers to hunt gardens from the air without a warrant. Choppers or planes, dirigibles or drones, all legal in the air above your property.

Since they do legally have a right to be there, then anything they see from that vantage point is legally admissible, and is NOT the fruit of a poisonous tree. In fact, it's the seed of a VERY usable tree.

For your links to apply, the craft would need to be under ~500 ft, and if they're under 500 ft @ your house, they're landing, not taking pictures

Oh, and nowhere in the Constitution or Bill of Rights does it list a right to Privacy.

Good Read: http://www.rbs2.com/privacy.htm
http://law2.umkc.edu/faculty/projects/ftrials/conlaw/rightofprivacy.html

 

[WarrenBuffet]

Fuckin' Pigs

 

[NiteTiger]

Good Read: http://www.rbs2.com/privacy.htm
http://law2.umkc.edu/faculty/projects/ftrials/conlaw/rightofprivacy.html

You're right, it is an EXCELLENT read! A nice article, and nothing more. Don't confuse that thesis with any kind of actual court ruling or legal argument. It's a term paper, a well researched article, or a personal letter, whatever you want to call it.

And it still says that nothing in public view is considered private.

The thing you're having an issue with is thinking in the third dimension. 500 ft over your property is a public park. That's what you're not getting.

If I'm in that park, and can see you and what you're doing, then what you are doing is not being done in private.

You do NOT own the sky!