I thought there were only two topics at hand....animal cruelty and rape. Here's a third...if you were looking for one....animal rape.
The fact is, that both are wrong, evil and self serving. None are beneficial in any way, shape or form. Which is worse? It depends on who is asking....an old lady who had her home invaded and was raped or the dog that someone hadn't fed in a long time or hadn't cleaned up after them or given them needed medication...whatever. The rape victim was violated. Her person was violated, her security, her privacy, her sense of comfort in her home her faith in humanity was violated....everything she holds dear is now in question. If she lives through it, the memories and feelings will be with her to the grave. The dog on the other hand will not carry this kind of emotional burden. Once the dog is nursed back to health, cared for and loved it will resume a normal doggie life. The question is kind of odd to me.....where one instance is toward a human and the other to an animal.
Two completely different actions. Both deserve to spend long amounts of time in prison sitting and staring at a wall, knowing that karma, and a big mutha named bubba, will take care of them.
who cares which is worse and why in whos opinion,, both are simply deplorable and stem from someone either not learning a certain lesson at an earlier point in their lives or not having the gene to be able to learn empathy at all,,, either that or their conscience should eat them up till the grave which is the worst and best punishment,,,
I can guarantee you a gazillion percent that the people on ICMag think every which way, and if you make a 3D graph of our answers, it'll tell you exactly nothing.