What's new

Whitehouses stance on Medical Marijuana 2011

headband 707

Plant whisperer
Veteran
'Medical' Marijuana
Marijuana and other drugs are addictive and unsafe, especially for use by young people. Unfortunately, efforts to "medicalize" marijuana have widened the public acceptance and availability of the drug.
There is no substitute for the scientific approval process employed by the FDA. For a drug to be made available to the public as medicine, the FDA requires rigorous research followed by tests for safety and efficacy. Only then can a substance be classified as medicine and prescribed by qualified health care professionals to patients.
In the wake of state and local laws that permit distribution of "medical" marijuana, dozens of localities have been left to grapple with poorly written laws that bypass the FDA process and allow marijuana to be used as a so-called medicine. John Knight, director of the Center for Adolescent Substance Abuse Research at Children's Hospital Boston, recently wrote: "Marijuana has gotten a free ride of sorts among the general public, who view it as non-addictive and less impairing than other drugs. However, medical science tells a different story."
Similarly, Christian Thurstone, a board-certified Child and Adolescent Psychiatrist, an Addiction Psychiatrist, and also an Assistant Professor of Psychiatry at the University of Colorado, said:
In the absence of credible data, this debate is being dominated by bad science and misinformation from people interested in using medical marijuana as a step to legalization for recreational use. Bypassing the FDA's well-established approval process has created a mess that especially affects children and adolescents. Young people, who are clearly being targeted with medical marijuana advertising and diversion, are most vulnerable to developing marijuana addiction and suffering from its lasting effects.
—Dr. Christian Thurstone, MD, Assistant Professor at Denver Health & Hospital Authority</SPAN>​
In the United States, the Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA) has approved 109 researchers to perform bona fide research with marijuana, marijuana extracts, and marijuana derivatives such as cannabidiol and cannabinol. Studies include evaluation of abuse potential, physical/psychological effects, adverse effects, therapeutic potential, and detection. Fourteen researchers are approved to conduct research with smoked marijuana on human subjects.
As a result of this extensive research, several marijuana-based medications have been found to be safe and effective by the FDA and are available for doctors to prescribe. Dronabinol, a synthetic form of tetrahydrocannabinol (THC), the most active ingredient in marijuana, is used to treat nausea and vomiting caused by chemotherapy. It is also used to treat loss of appetite and weight loss in people who have AIDS. Nabilone, a synthetic drug that mimics marijuana's main ingredient, is also prescribed to treat nausea and vomiting caused by cancer chemotherapy. Other medications based on one or more marijuana components are being carefully studied.
Aside from the problems accompanying the commercialization of marijuana, smoking any drug is unhealthy. That is why no major medical association has come out in favor of smoked marijuana for widespread medical use. For example, the American Cancer Society, American Glaucoma Foundation, National Pain Foundation, National Multiple Sclerosis Society, and other medical societies are not in favor of smoked "medical" marijuana. The American Medical Association has called for more research on the subject, with the caveat that this "should not be viewed as an endorsement of state-based medical cannabis programs, the legalization of marijuana, or that scientific evidence on the therapeutic use of cannabis meets the current standards for a prescription drug product."
According to the American Academy of Pediatrics:
Evidence suggests that pediatricians should continue their vigilant efforts to prevent the use of this drug by young people. The abuse of marijuana by adolescents is a major health problem with social, academic, developmental, and legal ramifications.58 Marijuana is an addictive, mind-altering drug capable of inducing dependency. Pediatricians are obligated to develop a reasoned approach to dealing with its use by children and adolescents so they can provide appropriate care and counsel ... Additional reasons for concern and counsel include anxieties and uncertainties about the potential harm that marijuana use may cause to adolescents during a period of rapid change in hormonal secretion, possible teratogenicity, and the known consequences of long-term use.
This Administration joins major medical societies in supporting increased research into marijuana's many components, delivered in a safe (non-smoked) manner, in the hopes that they can be available for physicians to legally prescribe when proven to be safe and effective. Outside the context of Federally approved research, the use and distribution of marijuana is prohibited in the United States.
 

headband 707

Plant whisperer
Veteran
Gee lets see if this one goes to a class action suit LOL

Gee lets see if this one goes to a class action suit LOL

By COURTNEY HUTCHISON, ABC News Medical Unit
July 12, 2011


Without medical marijuana, Scott Rozman swears, he wouldn't be alive today.
At 30, Rozman was the youngest documented case of teratoma and angiosarcoma, a rare and aggressive cancer that his doctors treated in the middle of his chest with equally aggressive rounds of chemotherapy. The chemo was so intense that he would throw up 40 to 50 times a day during treatment, unable to keep any food down. He lost 60 pounds during the first two months alone, making him potentially too weak to finish out his treatment
"The doctors thought I was a dead man," Rozman, now 46 and a life coach in Guttenberg, N.J., said.
But then Mary Jane came into his life.
As a last-ditch effort, his doctors prescribed him marijuana because of its purported ability to stave off chemotherapy nausea. Not only was he able to keep food down again, the marijuana calmed him and helped him cope psychologically with the harrowing experience of the chemotherapy sessions. Weed had done for Rozman what no traditional anti-nausea medication could.
The Department of Justice's Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA), however, would beg to differ.
Although 16 states recognize marijuana as a drug with important medicinal properties, the DEA has shot down a petition to reclassify marijuana as such, citing that it has "no accepted medical use." The result is that marijuana will remain within the strictest categorization of restricted substances, alongside heroin and LSD.
"As a doctor and medical researcher, I find the DEA's decision unfortunate," said Dr. Igor Grant, a neuropsychiatrist and director of the Center for Medicinal Cannabis Research at the University of California-San Diego. "It looks like they underplayed what positive information there is in the literature about marijuana. This policy is guided more by certain kinds of beliefs in the dangers of marijuana, at the expense of advance of medical knowledge for patients."
The DEA's refusal, laid out in a June 21 letter from DEA Administrator Michele Leonhart to the organizations who filed the petition back in 2002, marks yet another bump in the road for patients, doctors and activists fighting for improved access to what they deem a vitally therapeutic medication.
"The statement 'it has no accepted medical use' is simply wrong as a statement of fact," said Rob MacCoun, psychologist and professor of Law and Public Policy at University of California Berkeley Law School. "There is now considerable evidence showing medical benefits, at or exceeding standards of evidence for many other pharmaceuticals. Prescribing physicians in over a dozen states clearly see an accepted medical value for their patients."
Americans for Safe Access, one of the organizations petitioning the DEA, already has plans to appeal the decision, taking the federal government to court, and if necessary, the Supreme Court, in order to argue for the medicinal value of marijuana.
"Frankly, we're ready to go head to head with the Obama administration on this issue," said Kris Hermes, spokesman for Americans for Safe Access. "We have science on our side and we're hopeful the court will see it that way."
Calls made to the DEA for comment were not returned.

More from ABC News


Jul 12, 2011

The Feds don't care about you. They only care about protecting corrupt institutions and expanding their own power. Ideally, the government should serve the people. Somehow this got switched around so that the people are slaves to an oppressive and corrupt government.

ActvsDei
11:36 AM EDT
Jul 12, 2011

the DEA is the most worthless agency of the federal government
Why Reclassify?
The original petition sent to the DEA in 2002 called for reclassifying marijuana into schedule III, IV, or V, all of which would acknowledge its potential for medical use and place its threat as a potentially harmful and/or addictive substance as less severe than class I and II drugs such as heroine, cocaine, amphetamines and morphine.
Such a change means that marijuana would remain a controlled substance, but that its use in medical contexts would not be considered illegal under federal law, as is the case now.
It would also make it easier for studies on marijuana's medicinal properties to take place. Grant of the Center for Medicinal Cannabis Research said that even with federal compliance with his research on medicinal marijuana, each study takes at least a year to even garner approval because of all the regulatory red tape surrounding use of a schedule I drug in trials.
Berkeley's MacCoun said, "Schedule I is a barrier to research and to physician practice. Under federal law, it precludes physician prescriptions, putting state and federal laws in conflict for [those] states that have legalized medical marijuana."
War on Medicinal Marijuana?
The DEA's decision comes on the coattails of another move by the Department of Justice to reinforce federal restrictions on marijuana. U.S. Deputy Attorney General James Cole released a memo June 29 that reaffirms the department of justice's right and intention to prosecute large-scale medical marijuana cultivation operations and dispensaries even in states where they are operating in compliance with state laws.
The Cole memo purportedly "clarifies" the landmark memo written in 2009 by then Deputy Attorney General David Ogden, which suggested that the DOJ would not bother to prosecute those involved in state-sanctioned medicinal marijuana distribution.
Cole's clarification puts everyone from growers to pro-medicinal marijuana public officials within the DOJ's sights for prosecution. Only patients with prescriptions escape possible legal action from the government.
This regulatory dance emerges because the states that allow medicinal marijuana are in conflict with the federal drug laws that criminalize possession of marijuana, regardless of its intended use and these federal laws trump those of the states.
Obama campaigned with the promise not to interfere with states' rights in this area, so the Cole memo has been seen by marijuana advocates as the administration's backpedalling in response to the rapid proliferation of cannabis providers and distributors cropping up in recent years.
"The government's position is very clear," Hermes said. "The number of raids on medical marijuana distributors is staggering, far beyond what the Bush administration was doing. And because the federal government won't acknowledge marijuana as a medicinal substance, those arrested have absolutely no defense they can bring in federal court."
Hermes said be believes the "whole point" of the Cole memo was to create a "culture of fear" among growers, distributors, and patients.
Mitch Woolhiser, 43, happens to be all three. Diagnosed with seizure disorder in 1995, the medicinal marijuana distributor from Edgewater, Colo., got his prescription after reading studies suggesting that marijuana has anti-seizure properties.
He was able to wean himself slowly off the seizure meds that were straining his liver and today, years later, is seizure free. Now he provides medicinal-grade marijuana for at least 100 regular customers in the Denver area.
"The Ogden memo kind of opened the floodgates here in Colorado and that's what brought people into the industry of distributing marijuana, including me," he said. "It's very regulated, we do lab tests for THC levels [the major active compound in cannabis] and that makes everything more regulated for the patients.
"But if you go after the distributors, you're really just hurting the patients," he said. "You're taking away their ability to safely and conveniently get their medicine, and instead pushing them to buy it on the street."


Jul 12, 2011

The Feds don't care about you. They only care about protecting corrupt institutions and expanding their own power. Ideally, the government should serve the people. Somehow this got switched around so that the people are slaves to an oppressive and corrupt government.

the DEA is the most worthless agency of the federal government



:jump:

 
Last edited:

devilgoob

Active member
Veteran
xanax, klonopin, valium, morphine, vicodin....they are more dangerous the marijuana and more addictive. you can way overuse pills and expire your life, on cannabis you cannot.

Prozac, zoloft, paxil, abilify....they all make people have suicidal tendencies, they have BEEN SUED. They cause birth defects, very major ones. Also added to the suicidality of the patient, the are also homocidal and once again PAXIL AND ZOLOFT PAID OUT TO MORE THAN A FEW FAMILIES because of them shot-gunning their families etc. More like it increase impulse and crazy rage by a mile. These drugs are for cash.

The other drugs involving dopamine take away the personality and make the person a mass of neurons barely active. There are other ways than to destroy, create, block and change cells a lot. I think there is a fast-acting one....cannabis L sativa extract I believe does all these things in the simplest and best ways. It's all drugs combined without a lot of bad side effects.

This makes total sense that such a dynamic medicine THC:CBD:CBN ratios would scare the crap out of Bayer. Bayer was producing this marijuana tincture and a lot of mexicans and blacks who are crazy and rape white women (it happens, but it is all disgusting lies at the base of it) starting selling cannabis because you can grow it. The businesses didn't like the minorities so tied racism to pot and hysteria to misinformation and to totally mind fuck a nation into not being free and have to resort to alcohol which the prohibition had been recently lifted.


They used our dumbness, now we're a mass of retards which gain them money and therefore power. We take the power back though...don't worry. :pimp3: We are basic rebels of society, the only way society gains freedom is because of us, alright? Everyone is relying on everyone else and we have very little trust and faith due to the powers that are binding and set us against each other and/ or other nations just so they can make sure they win and do anything and are the world authority.

1984 Remember? :mopper: I didn't say it! Im just sweeping and being busy though!
 
Of course it's bad for you, if the biased "scientists" say so. It's only good for you when isolated, synthesized, and mass produced for profit. They will NOT allow another embarrassment in marijuana research to occur like the 6yr study that mayor laguardia(sp?) conducted for anslinger that showed marijuana to be harmless. These guys are clearly running out of excuses to stand behind. Always using children as an example/scare tactic to persuade people's views from the majority of the real mj or mmj users for that matter, resposible adults.

Nugz
 

meduser180056

Active member
I like how we went from everyone freaking out thinking cali was gonna legalize to this...

Shits so fucked up...

I think bigpharma and government might be concerned about not being able to control the plant and the profits it generates. Poppies are an acreage crop. Cannabis is a backyard crop lol..
 

Grass Lands

Member
Veteran
Hell yeah...its bad for us, until they legalize for profit...why in the world would they give us an opportunity to make an honest living off our sacred herb when they can give the evil pharma companies and tobacco companies all the profit...then it will be the next best thing since buttered popcorn...
 

KnowBudz

Active member
Not to belabor a point...but I can't help recalling how many in the weed community were all a-twitter about BHO being President, and bought into all his "hope and change" crapola.

The "problem" is NOT "big pharma" or other special interests...it is big government! As long as the electorate allow themselves to be preyed upon by politicians promising "change"...nothing will change (other than more of their liberties and wealth being sucked away)!!

:yay::nanana::beat-dead
 

Anti

Sorcerer's Apprentice
Veteran
The "problem" is NOT "big pharma" or other special interests...it is big government! As long as the electorate allow themselves to be preyed upon by politicians promising "change"...nothing will change (other than more of their liberties and wealth being sucked away)!!

So instead of the guy who sounds like he's going to do what we want, we should vote for the guys who are DEFINITELY not going to do what we want? Is that your proposal?

Vote for the liar who is telling you what you DON'T want to hear and hope he'll somehow do the opposite and we'll luck out?
 

KnowBudz

Active member
Not saying that at all. Research the candidates thoroughly (if that's not worth your time, don't even vote), and try to find one who seems most likely to be an effective leader for the country as a whole, AND has a record of leadership ability. Last election, we had two poor candidates, so a lot of folks picked the one they felt was less bad. Far more voted on rhetoric alone...never a good idea. Finally, many don't even consider candidates other than those of the two major parties. Career politicians from both parties are responsible for where we're at today!

Sadly, millions simply base their decision on what they see on TV and the rest of the MSM.
 

Anti

Sorcerer's Apprentice
Veteran
Since I've been old enough to vote, the choice has been between two poor candidates and people have picked the one they felt was less bad.

Most of the time, I've picked a third party candidate just to lend support to the concept of a multi-party system. But when I do so, people will accuse me of throwing my vote away.
 

zymos

Jammin'!
Veteran
Since I've been old enough to vote, the choice has been between two poor candidates and people have picked the one they felt was less bad.

Most of the time, I've picked a third party candidate just to lend support to the concept of a multi-party system. But when I do so, people will accuse me of throwing my vote away.

That reminds me of peeling off my "Don't blame me I voted for Nader" bumper sticker, because even I started to blame me...
 
the choice is always between a giant douch and a terd sandwich, lol fuct either way......
hey @ least maybe prices will go up for u guys in cali?
good luck ......MM
 
I

In~Plain~Site

Dude, you're from Canada

Nothing but bad mouthing us and now you want the USA to lead the way?

We need a facepalm emot BADLY
 

DoobieDuck

Senior Member
ICMag Donor
Veteran
There is no substitute for the scientific approval process employed by the FDA. For a drug to be made available to the public as medicine, the FDA requires rigorous research followed by tests for safety and efficacy. Only then can a substance be classified as medicine and prescribed by qualified health care professionals to patients...

Headband thanks for posting, good job, nicely done. Some great responses with facts and info as well. Please my freinds don't go off to political-politicians on this or we'll get it closed, thanks.

Although they state the above, the FDA has provided Sativex and Marinol the OK while still claiming there are NO medical bennefits. They just can't have it both ways. There is a substitute for the biased research and testing done by the FDA...and private research is being done and proving very differently.
Asa has filed an appeal which will allow the scientific studies and facts to be considered. Your guess is as good as mine what will happen with that, but it will be in the forefront of the national news media so no more hidding the evidance. Cheers..DD
 

headband 707

Plant whisperer
Veteran
It's so hard to split the politics from the cannabis and the sick from all of this and so the story goes. This the real stragedy here is that they are playing with lives and this is all Government including the Canadian Gov. Harper is the worst that has happened to cannabis since he got in. Marc Emery was bitting by a recluse spider now that strange isn't it????
All this being said I feel that they are heading in the wrong direction and they need to be stopped in their tracks before they go any further. I truly believe that a class action lawsuit needs to be taken out against the DEA/Feds for their obvious attempt at stiffling the truth about cannabis and all it's virtues. I for one have had enough of being nice to these assholes. There is more proof then any one person could ever need and still they fight. Do they have any of this type of info about any of the drugs they certanly have on the market today including alcohol? I think not ....Tell me there is not one lawyer out there smart enough to do this job in the US of A? Nah there is obviously a bigger picture here that we are all missing lol ,, I think that picture is" Ca$h" in their pockets LOL..peace out Headband707
 

DoobieDuck

Senior Member
ICMag Donor
Veteran
It's so hard to split the politics from the cannabis ..peace out Headband707
headband you are so right..I'm sick of this goverment crap too, but I mentioned politicians for a reason. If we can keep them out of the conversation, what I mean is not get into Bush vs Obama stuff, we will have a better chance of keeping this important thread alive. I've seen too many threads loose the point or message by getting into who voted for who rather than how to react and respond to thier ideas. We can mention goverments and what they are, or are not, doing. I hope everyone understands, Be well..DD.
 
Top