Thomkal Vwalaa
Member
I cannot present a fair opinion here. Who can really? Naturally then, the Science sub-forum is where this question needs to get answered. The opinions get old after a while. I know you all agree.
It's obvious where I stand on this issue. But let's see some peer reviewed opinions, cause I'm no professor.
imvho organics dominates chem indoors: environmental aspects, aesthetics of flower (and concentrate), safety, flower (and concentrate) quality in terms of affect, taste, smell, & harsh-factor.
I guess chem dominates in ease and yield. and for hydro ect. I don't know, that's what I read.
Outdoors is not a debate, I hope.
But enough with my opinion.
@IC: a little help getting these full text please.
http://www.emeraldinsight.com/journals.htm?articleid=866175&show=abstract
The organic milk I drink tastes WAY better than conventional. Strauss vs conventional, no contest. My milk has the fat on top and tastes sweet and grassy. Organic grass fed dairy kills it for anyone who knows what milk is supposed to taste like.
This next study was published in response to the prior. The title is flaming garbage imo. Should have just called it "The absence of evidence is not the evidence of absence". We all know organic tastes better.
I also saw a study that says organic meat is not statistically better than commercial. I buy all of my meat from the farmer's market. My non-organic friends cannot stand the semi-wild taste of this local free-range organic meat. We don't all know what good even means. It's hard to get statistics on taste.
It's obvious where I stand on this issue. But let's see some peer reviewed opinions, cause I'm no professor.
imvho organics dominates chem indoors: environmental aspects, aesthetics of flower (and concentrate), safety, flower (and concentrate) quality in terms of affect, taste, smell, & harsh-factor.
I guess chem dominates in ease and yield. and for hydro ect. I don't know, that's what I read.
Outdoors is not a debate, I hope.
But enough with my opinion.
@IC: a little help getting these full text please.
http://www.emeraldinsight.com/journals.htm?articleid=866175&show=abstract
Does organic food taste better? A claim substantiation approach
Author(s): Laurence Fillion, (Laurence Fillion is Senior Consumer Scientist, at the Sensory and Consumer Science Group at the Leatherhead Food Research Association, Leatherhead, UK.), Stacey Arazi, (Stacey Arazi is Sensory Scientist, at the Sensory and Consumer Science Group at the Leatherhead Food Research Association, Leatherhead, UK.)
Citation: Laurence Fillion, Stacey Arazi, (2002) "Does organic food taste better? A claim substantiation approach", Nutrition & Food Science, Vol. 32 Iss: 4, pp.153 - 157
Keywords: Consumers, Organic food, Taste
Article type: Research paper
DOI: 10.1108/00346650210436262 (Permanent URL)
Publisher: MCB UP Ltd
Abstract: As the demand for organic foods has grown globally, disputes have arisen on whether organic foods are more nutritious, safer, and better for the environment. To many consumers, though, a major issue is whether organic foods taste different and, especially if they are being asked to pay a premium price, whether they taste better. Via the use of sensory analysis using trained panellists, and consumer testing, research was carried out to determine whether the claim of “organic food tastes better” could be substantiated. The study found that organic orange juice was perceived as tasting better than conventional orange juice; however, no differences were found between organic and conventional milk. Therefore, it is concluded that the global claim that “organic food tastes better” is not valid, and each product type should be treated separately before a claim can be made.
The organic milk I drink tastes WAY better than conventional. Strauss vs conventional, no contest. My milk has the fat on top and tastes sweet and grassy. Organic grass fed dairy kills it for anyone who knows what milk is supposed to taste like.
This next study was published in response to the prior. The title is flaming garbage imo. Should have just called it "The absence of evidence is not the evidence of absence". We all know organic tastes better.
Yeah, okay, good point, but whatever. Organic was still preferred for produce (plants). And people aren't used to real tasting milk, they are accustomed to milk from hormone infused animals that eat the cheapest feed possible instead of grass and hay.Organic food claims cannot be substantiated through testing of samples intercepted in the marketplace: a horticulturalist's opinion
F. Roger Harker,
The Horticulture and Food Research Institute of New Zealand Ltd, Mt Albert Research Centre, Private Bag 92 169, Auckland, New Zealand
Available online 31 May 2003.
Abstract
Some studies comparing organic and non-organic foods continue to source products from retailers (see review by Bourn & Prescott [Critical Reviews in Food Science and Nutrition, 42 (2002) 1]). While the reasons for taking this approach are rarely stated, it is likely that in part the decision reflects the difficulty in obtaining test samples from agricultural field trials, and the assumption that mixing of products and/or raw materials during processing and marketing results in an unbiased and randomized distribution of samples on the retail shelf. However, decisions on appropriate sites, cultivars, and harvest criteria can differ between organic and non-organic sectors of agriculture. These decisions do not govern the organic status of a commodity, but may introduce systematic bias in the quality of food intercepted in the marketplace. Furthermore, the normal distribution of ‘quality’ obtained at harvest is sometimes modified through the imposition of ‘quality standards’, which aim to provide the consumer with a higher quality product than they might otherwise receive. Thus ‘quality’ on the retail shelf can reflect industry regulations as much as the different production systems. This article uses experiences in the apple industry to highlight how differences between organic and non-organic fruit observed in the marketplace may be confounded by factors not prescribed within organic production protocols. Claims that an organic product tastes ‘different’, is ‘preferred’ and/or ‘more healthy’ have the implicit expectation that the improvement is due to the way the food has been grown. Therefore, robust experimental approaches should source product from field trials rather than from retailers.
I also saw a study that says organic meat is not statistically better than commercial. I buy all of my meat from the farmer's market. My non-organic friends cannot stand the semi-wild taste of this local free-range organic meat. We don't all know what good even means. It's hard to get statistics on taste.