You mean the New world order.. lol...soft kill..
You mean the New world order.. lol...soft kill..
Sure, they don't like to mix...
Women get their own lodges too.
What is True Masonic Brotherhood?
...As the light becomes brighter, the Holy Scriptures will begin to come alive to you...their pages filled with the very real people who were our ancestors.
Jerusalem will cease to be just an ancient city on a map in the Middle East filled with centuries of war and unrest.
You will come to understand that Abraham (Father of all the Nations in the world) begat 2 sons: Isaac (ancestor to the Christian and Judaic nations) and Ishmael (ancestor to the Arab nations).
With this knowledge, your comprehension of our Creator's true meaning of "brotherhood" across the nations of the world, will unfold.
Or maybe the old world order?
American masons don't allow African-Americans among their ranks.
British masons don't allow atheists among their ranks.
Looks pretty much like back to the middle ages to me...
You will come to understand that Abraham (Father of all the Nations in the world) begat 2 sons: Isaac (ancestor to the Christian and Judaic nations) and Ishmael (ancestor to the Arab nations).
Their 'devices' are everywhere from churches to telephone boxes,, from the cafés of centrum to the Hague. The measurements, crafts and guilds of which play a major influence in the construction of society and our perceptions of it. Where in essence they are attempting to construct Plato's Cave as an allegorical prison for us all to dwell in.
Only those with wings can escape this process..
peace
that's bull shit, there are masoniac temples in Africa, much of the information has been passed through every race, religion and creed. From the middle east to asia and everything around and between is where the manuscripts come from.Yeah this much I also know ,,,,no blacks /no women hence the exclusion.. So yeah, I'm not down with this one.. peace out Headband707
Not all nations of the world are either Christian, Judaic or Arab.
There's some flaw in logic there...
Most of the nations that fit this criteria today were forced or bribed to adopt these believes; the Americas by the conquistadores, Europe and North Africa by the late Roman Empire, the crusades and so on. They did not inherit a common believe because they had common ancestors.
But let's not nit pick.
The masons I've met were all nice enough people and even though I disagree with their dogma, I'm ok with them doing their thing as long as they don't interfere with me doing mine.
Btw. what's the mason's stance on marijuana?
that's bull shit, there are masoniac temples in Africa, much of the information has been passed through every race, religion and creed. From the middle east to asia and everything around and between is where the manuscripts come from.
Way off base pal
The Masonic fraternity was extremely attractive to free blacks of the eighteenth century. Prince Hall and his followers saw Freemasonry as a platform where racial differences did not exist.[8] The Masonic ideals greatly appealed to Hall, especially the beliefs in liberty, equality and peace. Prior to the American Revolutionary War, Prince Hall and fourteen other free black men petitioned for the admittance to the white Boston St. John’s Lodge. They were turned away. Some whites were irate of the audacity for blacks applying to be Masons. Due to the resistance of colonial Masonries, Hall looked elsewhere and on March 6, 1775, Hall and fifteen other free blacks were initiated into the Masonry by members of the Irish Military Lodge No. 441. The Lodge was attached to the British forces stationed in Boston. Hall and the other freedmen founded African Lodge No. 1 with Prince Hall named as Grand Master.
A problem quickly arose for black men wishing to become Masons in the newly formed United States: the members of a Lodge must agree unanimously in an anonymous vote to accept a petitioner to receive the degrees. As a consequence of the unanimity requirement, if just one member of a lodge did not want black men in his Lodge, his vote was enough to cause the petitioner's rejection. This sentiment can be seen in the letter of General Albert Pike to his brother in 1875 where he says, “ I am not inclined to mettle in the matter. I took my obligations to white men, not to Negroes. When I have to accept Negroes as brothers or leave Masonry, I shall leave it.”[9] Thus, although exceptions did exist, Masonic Lodges and Grand Lodges in the United States generally excluded African Americans. And since the vote is conducted anonymously, this created a second problem: since no one knew who had voted against the applicant, it was impossible to identify a member as pursuing a policy of racism. This allowed even a tiny number of prejudiced members to effectively deny membership to black petitioners, and in some cases even exclude black men who had legitimately been made Masons in integrated jurisdictions. Thus there arose a system of racial segregation in American Masonry, which remained in place until the 1960s and which persists in some jurisdictions even to this day.
And the question is LOL LOL LOL...
I am guaranteeing that many if not most masons voted Democrated therefore they voted for a BLACK President.You took that out of context which was American masons not African masons.
All men are brothers... as long as they're white...
http://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Prince_Hall