SNYPE GOT BOPED!
- Thread starter Snypette
- Start date
- Status
MoldyFrogToe
Member
any bets on how long before these 2 get screwed by the law again?
edit: the better question would be how badly will they get screwed next time?
jail? permanent license revocation? the possibilities for lack of foresight are endless!
edit: the better question would be how badly will they get screwed next time?
jail? permanent license revocation? the possibilities for lack of foresight are endless!
ArcticBlast
WasntMe
Member
A little bit on why it's healthy for Men to Date younger women (pulled from http://scienceblog.com/cms/old-men-chasing-young-women-good-thing-14203.html ) .... ps it doesn't work the other way around .... older women with younger men shortens life spans.
It turns out that older men chasing younger women contributes to human longevity and the survival of the species, according to new findings by researchers at Stanford and the University of California-Santa Barbara.
Evolutionary theory says that individuals should die of old age when their reproductive lives are complete, generally by age 55 in humans, according to demographer Cedric Puleston, a doctoral candidate in biological sciences at Stanford. But the fatherhood of a small number of older men is enough to postpone the date with death because natural selection fights life-shortening mutations until the species is finished reproducing.
“Rod Stewart and David Letterman having babies in their 50s and 60s provide no benefit for their personal survival, but the pattern [of reproducing at a later age] has an effect on the population as a whole,” Puleston said. “It’s advantageous to the species if these people stick around. By increasing the survival of men you have a spillover effect on women because men pass their genes to children of both sexes.”
“Why Men Matter: Mating Patterns Drive Evolution of Human Lifespan,” was published Aug. 29 in the online journal Public Library of Science ONE. Shripad Tuljapurkar, the Morrison Professor of Population Studies at Stanford; Puleston; and Michael Gurven, an assistant professor of anthropology at UCSB, co-authored the study in an effort to understand why humans don’t die when female reproduction ends.
Human ability to scale the so-called “wall of death”—surviving beyond the reproductive years—has been a center of scientific controversy for more than 50 years, Puleston said. “The central question is: Why should a species that stops reproducing by some age stick around afterward?” he said. “Evolutionary theory predicts that, over time, harmful mutations that decrease survival will arise in the population and will remain invisible to natural selection after reproduction ends.” However, in hunter-gatherer societies, which likely represent early human demographic conditions and mating patterns, one-third of people live beyond 55 years, past the reproductive lifespan for women. Furthermore, life expectancy in today’s industrialized countries is 75 to 85 years, with mortality increasing gradually, not abruptly, following female menopause.
Grandmother hypothesis
In 1966, William Hamilton, a British evolutionary biologist, worked out the mathematics describing the “wall of death.” Since then, the most popular explanation for why humans don’t die by age 55 has been termed the “grandmother hypothesis,” which suggests that women enhance the survival of their children and grandchildren by living long enough to care for them and “increasing the success of their genes,” Puleston said. However, Hamilton’s work has been difficult to express as a mathematical and genetic argument explaining why people live into old age.
Unlike previous research on human reproduction, this study—for the first time—includes data on males, a tweak that allowed the researchers to begin answering the “wall of death” question by matching it to human mortality patterns. According to Puleston, earlier studies looked only at women, because scientists can reproduce good datasets for humans entirely based on information related to female fertility and survival rates.
“Men’s fertility is contingent on women’s fertility—you have to figure out how they match up. We care about reproduction because that is a currency by which force of selection is counted. If we have not accounted for the entire pattern of reproduction, we may be missing something that’s important to evolution.”
Men and longevity
In the paper, the researchers analyzed “a general two-sex model to show that selection favors survival for as long as men reproduce.” The scientists presented a “range of data showing that males much older than 50 years have substantial realized fertility through matings with younger females, a pattern that was likely typical among early humans.” As a result, Puleston said, older male fertility helps to select against damaging cell mutations in humans who have passed the age of female menopause, consequently eliminating the “wall of death.”
“Our analysis shows that old-age male fertility allows evolution to breach Hamilton’s wall of death and predicts a gradual rise in mortality after the age of female menopause without relying on ‘grandmother’ effects or economic optimality,” the researchers say in the paper.
The scientists compiled longevity and fertility data from two hunter-gatherer groups, the Dobe !Kung of the Kalahari and the Ache of Paraguay, one of the most isolated populations in the world. They also looked at the forager-farmer Yanomamo of Brazil and Venezuela, and the Tsimane, an indigenous group in Bolivia. “They’re living a lifestyle that our ancestors lived and their fertility patterns are probably most consistent with our ancestors,” Puleston said about the four groups. The study also looked at several farming villages in Gambia and, for comparison, a group of modern Canadians.
In the less developed, traditional societies, males were as much as 5-to-15 years older than their female partners. In the United States and Europe, the age spread was about two years. “It’s a universal pattern that in typical marriages men are older than women,” Puleston said. “The age gaps vary by culture, but in every group we looked at men start [being reproductive] later. At the end of reproduction, male fertility rates taper off gradually, as opposed to the fairly sharp decline in female fertility by menopause.”
Despite small differences based on marriage traditions, all women and most men in the six groups stopped having children by their 50s, the researchers found. But some men, particularly high-status males, continued to reproduce into their 70s. The paper noted that the age gap is most pronounced in societies that favor polygyny, where a man takes several wives, and in gerontocracies, where older men monopolize access to reproductive women. The authors also cite genetic and anthropological evidence that early humans were probably polygynous as well.
Older male fertility also exists in societies supporting serial monogamy, because men are more likely to remarry than women. “For these reasons, we argue that realized male fertility was substantial at ages well past female menopause for much of human history and the result is reflected in the mortality patterns of modern populations,” the authors say. “We conclude that deleterious mutations acting after the age of female menopause are selected against … solely as a result of the matings between older males and younger females.”
According to Puleston, the “grandmother hypothesis” may be true, but the real pattern of male fertility extends beyond this explanation. “The key question is: Does the population have a greater growth rate if men are reproducing at a later age? The answer is ‘yes.’ The age of last reproduction gets pushed into the 60s and 70s if you add men to the analysis. Hamilton’s approach was right, but in a species where males and females have different reproductive patterns, you need a two-sex model. You can’t correctly estimate the force of selection if you leave men out of the picture. As a man myself, it’s gratifying to know that men do matter.”
Grants from the U.S. National Institute on Aging supported this study.
It turns out that older men chasing younger women contributes to human longevity and the survival of the species, according to new findings by researchers at Stanford and the University of California-Santa Barbara.
Evolutionary theory says that individuals should die of old age when their reproductive lives are complete, generally by age 55 in humans, according to demographer Cedric Puleston, a doctoral candidate in biological sciences at Stanford. But the fatherhood of a small number of older men is enough to postpone the date with death because natural selection fights life-shortening mutations until the species is finished reproducing.
“Rod Stewart and David Letterman having babies in their 50s and 60s provide no benefit for their personal survival, but the pattern [of reproducing at a later age] has an effect on the population as a whole,” Puleston said. “It’s advantageous to the species if these people stick around. By increasing the survival of men you have a spillover effect on women because men pass their genes to children of both sexes.”
“Why Men Matter: Mating Patterns Drive Evolution of Human Lifespan,” was published Aug. 29 in the online journal Public Library of Science ONE. Shripad Tuljapurkar, the Morrison Professor of Population Studies at Stanford; Puleston; and Michael Gurven, an assistant professor of anthropology at UCSB, co-authored the study in an effort to understand why humans don’t die when female reproduction ends.
Human ability to scale the so-called “wall of death”—surviving beyond the reproductive years—has been a center of scientific controversy for more than 50 years, Puleston said. “The central question is: Why should a species that stops reproducing by some age stick around afterward?” he said. “Evolutionary theory predicts that, over time, harmful mutations that decrease survival will arise in the population and will remain invisible to natural selection after reproduction ends.” However, in hunter-gatherer societies, which likely represent early human demographic conditions and mating patterns, one-third of people live beyond 55 years, past the reproductive lifespan for women. Furthermore, life expectancy in today’s industrialized countries is 75 to 85 years, with mortality increasing gradually, not abruptly, following female menopause.
Grandmother hypothesis
In 1966, William Hamilton, a British evolutionary biologist, worked out the mathematics describing the “wall of death.” Since then, the most popular explanation for why humans don’t die by age 55 has been termed the “grandmother hypothesis,” which suggests that women enhance the survival of their children and grandchildren by living long enough to care for them and “increasing the success of their genes,” Puleston said. However, Hamilton’s work has been difficult to express as a mathematical and genetic argument explaining why people live into old age.
Unlike previous research on human reproduction, this study—for the first time—includes data on males, a tweak that allowed the researchers to begin answering the “wall of death” question by matching it to human mortality patterns. According to Puleston, earlier studies looked only at women, because scientists can reproduce good datasets for humans entirely based on information related to female fertility and survival rates.
“Men’s fertility is contingent on women’s fertility—you have to figure out how they match up. We care about reproduction because that is a currency by which force of selection is counted. If we have not accounted for the entire pattern of reproduction, we may be missing something that’s important to evolution.”
Men and longevity
In the paper, the researchers analyzed “a general two-sex model to show that selection favors survival for as long as men reproduce.” The scientists presented a “range of data showing that males much older than 50 years have substantial realized fertility through matings with younger females, a pattern that was likely typical among early humans.” As a result, Puleston said, older male fertility helps to select against damaging cell mutations in humans who have passed the age of female menopause, consequently eliminating the “wall of death.”
“Our analysis shows that old-age male fertility allows evolution to breach Hamilton’s wall of death and predicts a gradual rise in mortality after the age of female menopause without relying on ‘grandmother’ effects or economic optimality,” the researchers say in the paper.
The scientists compiled longevity and fertility data from two hunter-gatherer groups, the Dobe !Kung of the Kalahari and the Ache of Paraguay, one of the most isolated populations in the world. They also looked at the forager-farmer Yanomamo of Brazil and Venezuela, and the Tsimane, an indigenous group in Bolivia. “They’re living a lifestyle that our ancestors lived and their fertility patterns are probably most consistent with our ancestors,” Puleston said about the four groups. The study also looked at several farming villages in Gambia and, for comparison, a group of modern Canadians.
In the less developed, traditional societies, males were as much as 5-to-15 years older than their female partners. In the United States and Europe, the age spread was about two years. “It’s a universal pattern that in typical marriages men are older than women,” Puleston said. “The age gaps vary by culture, but in every group we looked at men start [being reproductive] later. At the end of reproduction, male fertility rates taper off gradually, as opposed to the fairly sharp decline in female fertility by menopause.”
Despite small differences based on marriage traditions, all women and most men in the six groups stopped having children by their 50s, the researchers found. But some men, particularly high-status males, continued to reproduce into their 70s. The paper noted that the age gap is most pronounced in societies that favor polygyny, where a man takes several wives, and in gerontocracies, where older men monopolize access to reproductive women. The authors also cite genetic and anthropological evidence that early humans were probably polygynous as well.
Older male fertility also exists in societies supporting serial monogamy, because men are more likely to remarry than women. “For these reasons, we argue that realized male fertility was substantial at ages well past female menopause for much of human history and the result is reflected in the mortality patterns of modern populations,” the authors say. “We conclude that deleterious mutations acting after the age of female menopause are selected against … solely as a result of the matings between older males and younger females.”
According to Puleston, the “grandmother hypothesis” may be true, but the real pattern of male fertility extends beyond this explanation. “The key question is: Does the population have a greater growth rate if men are reproducing at a later age? The answer is ‘yes.’ The age of last reproduction gets pushed into the 60s and 70s if you add men to the analysis. Hamilton’s approach was right, but in a species where males and females have different reproductive patterns, you need a two-sex model. You can’t correctly estimate the force of selection if you leave men out of the picture. As a man myself, it’s gratifying to know that men do matter.”
Grants from the U.S. National Institute on Aging supported this study.
hotmellons
Member
why care about someone love life. this mary jane website
lol ok enough
glad you're out bro, be careful next time, good luck!ArcticBlast
S
StrayToaster
look what making plays did to me.....its just not worth it girl!!
C
cyberwax
I like the way this thread is going.
MoldyFrogToe
Member
kidz bop. i totally forgot about that
-~Wind Walker~-
Active member
Here ye, here ye.
Here ye, here ye.
I the (dis)honorable -~Wind Walker~- judge of this kangaroo court now call the final proceedings of this court to order...
(bangs gavel, takes a slug of some unknown booze)
Snype & Snypette,
You have been brought up on several charges, offenses and a wee bit of the defense.
Here are your charges and the findings of this court.
1st Charge:
Driving silly, guilty as charged. Good luck.
2nd Charge:
Transporting copious amounts of cannabis, no contest. Good luck!
3rd Charge:
Severe cat scratching, guilty as charged. Must sentence you to an aloe treatment program.
4th Charge:
Pedophilia, not guilty.
5th and final charge, disclosing too much personal information via the internet, charge reduced to a misdemeanor, time served. (whacks his gavel for dramatic effect a few times and takes two slugs of booze).
And finally for those two hooligans in the back,
YES, I mean Rotton and Wolf!
I find you contempt of court for excessive explosions!
I (here i raise my voice, leaning forward and glaring) sentence you to three years hard labor in a North Korean prison camp!
And finally as the (dis) honorable judge of this kangaroo court...
I sentence all of you who posted or lurked this thread to listen and dance to this song posted below:
------>http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1yujJPYPfxI<--------
You must crank this song loud, drink and/or smoke and dance like crazy!
Good Guys Don't Wear White lyrics
I'm a poor boy born in a rut
Some say my manners aint the best
Some of my friends have been in a whole lot of trouble
And some say i'm no better than the rest
But tell your momma and your papa
Sometimes good guys don't wear white
Everyday I work hard
At night I spend a restless time
Those rich kids and all their lazy money
They can't hold a candle to mine
So tell your momma and your papa
Sometimes good guys don't wear white
Good guys, bad guys
Which is which?
The white collar worker
Or the digger of the ditch?
Man, who's to say who's the better man?
Of those two, I'm doin the very best I can
Best I can
You thought I had a dirty mind
All those messed up chicks
Of the changing times
White filth and easy livin
Can't come close
To the love that I've given
So tell your momma and your papa
Sometimes good guys don't wear white
They don't wear white
They don't wear white
They don't wear white
They don't wear white
Here ye, here ye (again with the gavel) NO MORE BLOODY EXPLOSIONS & I call this court and thread adjourned!
Lets get on with the music, drinking, smoking and crazy dancing!
-~WW~-
Here ye, here ye.
I the (dis)honorable -~Wind Walker~- judge of this kangaroo court now call the final proceedings of this court to order...
(bangs gavel, takes a slug of some unknown booze)
Snype & Snypette,
You have been brought up on several charges, offenses and a wee bit of the defense.
Here are your charges and the findings of this court.
1st Charge:
Driving silly, guilty as charged. Good luck.
2nd Charge:
Transporting copious amounts of cannabis, no contest. Good luck!
3rd Charge:
Severe cat scratching, guilty as charged. Must sentence you to an aloe treatment program.
4th Charge:
Pedophilia, not guilty.
5th and final charge, disclosing too much personal information via the internet, charge reduced to a misdemeanor, time served. (whacks his gavel for dramatic effect a few times and takes two slugs of booze).
And finally for those two hooligans in the back,
YES, I mean Rotton and Wolf!
I find you contempt of court for excessive explosions!
I (here i raise my voice, leaning forward and glaring) sentence you to three years hard labor in a North Korean prison camp!
And finally as the (dis) honorable judge of this kangaroo court...
I sentence all of you who posted or lurked this thread to listen and dance to this song posted below:
------>http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1yujJPYPfxI<--------
You must crank this song loud, drink and/or smoke and dance like crazy!
Good Guys Don't Wear White lyrics
I'm a poor boy born in a rut
Some say my manners aint the best
Some of my friends have been in a whole lot of trouble
And some say i'm no better than the rest
But tell your momma and your papa
Sometimes good guys don't wear white
Everyday I work hard
At night I spend a restless time
Those rich kids and all their lazy money
They can't hold a candle to mine
So tell your momma and your papa
Sometimes good guys don't wear white
Good guys, bad guys
Which is which?
The white collar worker
Or the digger of the ditch?
Man, who's to say who's the better man?
Of those two, I'm doin the very best I can
Best I can
You thought I had a dirty mind
All those messed up chicks
Of the changing times
White filth and easy livin
Can't come close
To the love that I've given
So tell your momma and your papa
Sometimes good guys don't wear white
They don't wear white
They don't wear white
They don't wear white
They don't wear white
Here ye, here ye (again with the gavel) NO MORE BLOODY EXPLOSIONS & I call this court and thread adjourned!
Lets get on with the music, drinking, smoking and crazy dancing!
-~WW~-
Last edited:
Um... I don't think it's considered legal to drink and/or smoke while listening to Minor Threat. They were a Sharp outfit, weren't they?
Ian MacKaye would roll over in his grave if he weren't still alive.
you can count.. me.. out..! lol jk jk
ArcticBlast
jk jkArcticBlast
robbiedublu
Member
Prepared except for driving with a suspended license while holding (not sure what but something apparently) Still, best wishes to both of you.
Just read the whole thread and the "snype's" stories have more holes in them than a second hand dartboard or a T-BAG. I dont believe it for a minute.
(1) no connection between you both (not possible).
(2) no way of the feds catching you again (not possible).
(3) having some kind of plan (surely you are joking).
(4) when you post a picture on line of yourself you can easily be traced to that person and the I.P address.
(5) you were very silly to even post this on any kind of website.
(6) you will be caught again.
(7) and you got out so soon after having so much green in your car (dont believe that for a second).
(good luck hiding from the feds).
(1) no connection between you both (not possible).
(2) no way of the feds catching you again (not possible).
(3) having some kind of plan (surely you are joking).
(4) when you post a picture on line of yourself you can easily be traced to that person and the I.P address.
(5) you were very silly to even post this on any kind of website.
(6) you will be caught again.
(7) and you got out so soon after having so much green in your car (dont believe that for a second).
(good luck hiding from the feds).
(1) of course me and Snypette can be connected, but not to any grow operations. Cars are registered to different address's and so is everything else. Grow houses are bought in other people's names, so we are not connected to those either.
(2) feds have better things to do than to spend money looking for small timers like myself. There's bigger things to focus on and what I show on the site is less than 100 plants.
(3) no plan is 100% perfect but the plan that I have is my best option for what I'm working with.
(4) that's what proxy's are for
(5) you call it silly, I call it putting the information out there so micro growers or people who are too scared to grow, see that the laws really aren't that bad for people like us and they can see some of the consequences that I'll be dealing with, which I suspect won't be that bad for the risks involved.
(6) it is very probable that I will be caught again but that's one of the risks of living this type of lifestyle. The point is people will see everything that happens to me every time I get arrested.
(7) I can tell that you haven't been arrested before. My last case, I got caught with a really big distribution case for a very expensive white substance. I made bail within 6 hours for less than 5k. This is very common for non-violent offenders who are white. Do a little research and you'll see how fast you get out. As long as you're not a flight risk and a violent offender, it is very typical that you get bail within 24 hours. If you can't afford to get out, then you stay as long as it takes. I don't have that problem.
The point behind my maddness, is to show the masses that it's ok to grow whatever you want and make a good living without as much risk as you might think. Police have better things to do than try to find a bunch of hippie growers. The majority of people get caught because:
1. Snitches that you told about your OP or people you showed it to
2. Smells getting out of your location
3. Stealing electricity
4. Car or License being tied to your grow when you got arrested
5. Having your plants in places where people can see them
I've been arrested enough times now to feel more comfortable talking about experiences like this that I have. I don't believe there's cops in here reading the tokers den but if there are then hello. If cops where looking for growers, then everyone who has pictures on the site would be shut down by now. The only problem that someone might have on the site, is if they meet someone from the site and they turn out to be a cop. Some people will learn from my experiences and choose to step their game up. Growers are so paranoid that everyone is out to get them and it is not true.
Dont you think the feds can catch you if you use a proxy
And i aint silly enough to be driving around in an unregistered car with a suspended licence with gear in the boot and an underage lady in the car as it just screams out to the feds for a pull (are you tripping).
And posting a pic of anything can be traced to that person and location and i know that for a fact (cant say why).
And snypette would never be taking a taxi home after being stopped while you go to jail thats total B.S.
So you say you got carted of to jail and snypette just grabbed a cab home or near home
.So the car and the gear just got left at the side of the road did it ??.
And this so called plan you keep going on about is just a fantasy in your mind and if it is true you were stitched up like a kipper and will be flipped on again.
And i have been arrested but not for any drug offences. Also if you got busted with the green in your unregistered car they would immediately take you home and search your crib FACT.
We aint all stupid and i dont think you have even read the whole thread as its full of holes in every story you tell.
Maybe it is possible that feds can get proxy's but I really don't know. What I do know is that thousands of people have grows on this site and other sites and nothing happens to them because of the pictures that they show. The car was not unregistered, it was registered in someone else's name that is not tied to any illegal activity and that person doesn't know where any of my locations are. He/she is paid good money for this. You said you read the thread but Snypette is not underage in any way at all. She is an adult and she only has a permit. In my state you can't just go get your license because you need driving experience to pass the test so they give you a permit so that you can drive during certain hours. We don't shit where we sleep so we are hours away from where we do business. Because of this there is no one who has a license to drive me around and our only other option would be to take taxi's around which would be about $800 per play which I would not be willing to pay. As I said before, busses or trains are too hot to take chances on. Had a bad experience in the past. I don't know how hard it is to understand that Snypette took a taxi home but that was the only way for her to get home. It was the only option and the right option to take to lesson the stress involved for her and what she had to deal with. So yes, I got carted off to jail and the cops drove Snypette to a safe location to be dropped off. As far as the car and the gear, the car was towed and seized and the trees were taken as evidence. The could never get a warrant to search my home because my license leads back to a clean apartment. As I said before, I can't be tracked back to my grows by local cops. You have no experience at all getting arrested for drugs but in your mind you know all about it. You see what I do and how hot that I am. You know that because of how hot that I seem now, that I was probably a lot hotter when I was younger and probably went to jail plenty of times. I'm still here right? I'm no threat to society and I have money and I'm white so things are great. Take the thread how you want but I have no reason to lie about what happened. Also, to my knowledge, I never put any pics of myself on the site but I could be wrong. I'm not sure what country you are in but in most states in the US, you get arrested and you're out by morning. Not being able to understand that means you lack in common sense. I find it amusing that you think Snypette didn't take a cab home. How do you think that she would get all the way home.Dont you think the feds can catch you if you use a proxy
And i aint silly enough to be driving around in an unregistered car with a suspended licence with gear in the boot and an underage lady in the car as it just screams out to the feds for a pull (are you tripping).
And posting a pic of anything can be traced to that person and location and i know that for a fact (cant say why).
And snypette would never be taking a taxi home after being stopped while you go to jail thats total B.S.
So you say you got carted of to jail and snypette just grabbed a cab home or near home
So the car and the gear just got left at the side of the road did it ??.
And this so called plan you keep going on about is just a fantasy in your mind and if it is true you were stitched up like a kipper and will be flipped on again.
And i have been arrested but not for any drug offences. Also if you got busted with the green in your unregistered car they would immediately take you home and search your crib FACT.
We aint all stupid and i dont think you have even read the whole thread as its full of holes in every story you tell.
- Status
