hilarious! I actually thought I was trying to see this from all sides, hence my post defending walmarts action. My view was the only differing view here!Wow.. Friend just try and see this from all sides.
...
PEACE!
hilarious! I actually thought I was trying to see this from all sides, hence my post defending walmarts action. My view was the only differing view here!Wow.. Friend just try and see this from all sides.
...
Im not following you bro. The pee-test was initiated due to an accident. Not "reefermadness". You want this clutz working for you?
hilarious! I actually thought I was trying to see this from all sides, hence my post defending Walmart's action. My view was the only differing view here!
PEACE!
"THEY CAME FIRST for the Communists,
and I didn't speak up because I wasn't a Communist.
THEN THEY CAME for the trade unionists,
and I didn't speak up because I wasn't a trade unionist.
THEN THEY CAME for the Jews,
and I didn't speak up because I wasn't a Jew.
THEN THEY CAME for me
and by that time no one was left to speak up."
Suing on what grounds? As far as I know WalMart is considered at will employment, and he can be fired for any reason whatsoever. They could just as well fire someone for NOT failing a drug test.
If the ACLU wants to foot the bill for the lawsuit, more power to them. But it seems to me, if he has a condition that prevents gainfull employment (by virtue of failing a drug test) he should also be suing for possible workmans comp. and SSI disability benefits for the rest of his life, which probably equal Walmart pay anyway.
If everyone who was fired for failing the drug test after procuring a legal prescription sued for Workmans comp, and/or SSI disability and won, I'm sure the laws would change real quick
We may be seeing that we have been and are trained to defend Fascism by always defending big business over Civil Liberties.
Now I agree there is no place in the workplace to be intoxicated on anything and that there are responsibilities to workplace safety but there is also reasonable use of medical cannabis.
I have been high at work for my whole life and always was a good and hardworking employee. If I smoke a bowl, it does not make me walk around stumbling. It does not make me drool. It does not make me lose my hand eye coordination. It does not make me more accident prone. It does not make me dangerous.
It just allows me to have a much nicer day.
Very well said Jack!I thought you might notice how people automatically separate the weak and vulnerable into an object of ridicule in order to be a member of the Strong. It's a social behaviour many folks are mostly unconscious of because of habit.
Indeed, but I think there are a few jobs that deal with public safety, such as airline pilots, that I do not want them smoking out. 98% of jobs do not fit this requirement. I agree 1000% that MJ is not a detriment to working for the "trained" smoker...
WFF
I have been high at work for my whole life and always was a good and hardworking employee. If I smoke a bowl, it does not make me walk around stumbling. It does not make me drool. It does not make me lose my hand eye coordination. It does not make me more accident prone. It does not make me dangerous.
It just allows me to have a much nicer day.
We need to look to 2012 in California to go after worker protections if nothing else!
This Tac2010 in California is just the first "Penetration" and we workers are still fucked!
So think about it. We need to get active for 2012 and get an Infinitive on the Ballot to protect us people!
Freedom isn't free..
So I ask If we care so much why do we allow bars to have parking lots? That's when they usually walk away grunting.
I have to say work isn't the place to party
...
Again no disrespect meant but I do stand for workplace safety but not workplace Drug court with an Economic punishment for responsible use of Cannabis.