I get what your saying, but he had no control over some douche who released a photo that was probably snapped without his knowledge or consent. So its not like he chose to make it public and I doubt he truly contemplated the risks involved.....he just won how many gold medals? Losing sponsors over taking a hit off the bong was probably the last thing on his mind.
I just pointed out the 3 months because it seems like a stiff punishment until you consider that it might have been no punishment at all(no missed events).
For all we know he could smoke as much as possible while avoiding tests, or even having the tests circumvented. This "punishment" could have simply been a public slap on the wrist to say "drugs are bad" even when taken by an Olympic athlete.
all i meant by my post was that olympians who smoke pot likely aren't as competitive because smoking anything will lead to reduced lung capacity & endurance which would affect performance . . . .
The difference between 3rd and 1st is often so slight athletes will do almost anything to get that competitive edge . . . so smoking seems kind of like a backslide and considering these people train their lives just for the opportunity to compete, smoking pot "just for kicks" seems somewhat stupid and even reckless since there are legal repercussions as well (fucking usa)
The fact that Michael Phelps was suspended is irrelevant, kmk brought up MIchael Phelps as an example of an gold-medal winning olympian who smokes, and my counter point was just to mention that it was probably not something he does often (if ever) and that the repercussions were both real and diverse , he just asked me for clarification regarding how it "literally" removed him from competition, I didn't really care if the punishment was warranted, that's all meaningless, I just meant to say that regardless of any physical damage that particular instance had additional repercussions as well.