Alex Jones

[cork144]

ive spent 6 years on 9/11

the only new infomation i have learnt about it was in jessie venturas show.

i do know the airport security company that was responsible for "not noticing" the christmasday underwear bomber was also the security that missed the "hijackers"

there is no way this thing isnt staged,

 

[Grat3fulh3ad]

lmao... you need to read... ALEX JONES has fooled you...

Until you read all of the info at the link I posted which directly answers all your questions, I cannot talk to you anymore, you lack the background info to do so intelligently...

 

[cork144]

ive listened to alex jones for 6 months!

 

[Grat3fulh3ad]

once again

lmao... you need to read... ALEX JONES has fooled you...

Until you read all of the info at the link I posted which directly answers all your questions, I cannot talk to you anymore, you lack the background info to do so intelligently...

 

[alaskan]

lmao... I never said I could debunk it all from my own research... why do my own research...lol

Fixed

Did you come up with the demolition theory or are you just a pot calling a kettle something?

There's a pretty big difference between accepting a story from day one (same story for almost a decade now,) and looking into it for a couple of years and coming to a conclusion.

Actually it's a gigantic difference...

 

[Grat3fulh3ad]

I do not buy the official story, but I also do not buy the controlled demolition bullshit... Know too much about building hi-rises to buy that pantload...

 

[Grat3fulh3ad]

Fixed

There's a pretty big difference between accepting a story from day one (same story for almost a decade now,) and looking into it for a couple of years and coming to a conclusion.

Actually it's a gigantic difference...

Actually there is no difference except in your feeble mind...

LOL... so you won't read it either... no worries... I'll just lol and shake my head at ya...

 

[Grat3fulh3ad]

lmao... you need to read... ALEX JONES has fooled you...

Until you read all of the info at the link I posted which directly answers all your questions, I cannot talk to you anymore, you lack the background info to do so intelligently...

OK I'm done with this foolishness until you guys educate yourself...
http://www.debunking911.com/pull.htm

 

[cork144]

ok, goto your little site, thats keeping your security intact, ive now looked at the sites propaganda, the spoonfulls of it were quite overwhelming!

check this image of BUILDING 5, check your sites damage radius of the towers falling,
http://www.debunking911.com/fig-1-7.jpg wait ill link it for you! BUILDING 6 WAS IN THE WAY OF SEVEN, AND IT DID NOT FALL UNTILL THE DEMOLITION TEAMS BAUGHT IT DOWN.

http://willyloman.files.wordpress.com/2008/08/building-5-and-6.jpg

THEYRE STILL STANDING, THEY HAD TO BE BAUGHT DOWN BY CONTROLLED DEMOLITION LONG AFTER THE ATTACKS!

check the damage to building 6, its still standing! IT WAS IN THE WAY OF SEVEN
http://www.bcrevolution.ca/images/numbersixafter_closeup.jpg

they even had to bring it down to clear it! IT WAS IN THE WAY OF SEVEN
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FNEoiOP76QQ


building 7's collapse.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Fw0wcVYpESg

 

[Grat3fulh3ad]

so you don't comprehend the data... no worries I thought it might go over some of you guy's heads... lol

BTW you didn't read the whole thing...

 

[alaskan]

I do not buy the official story, but I also do not buy the controlled demolition bullshit... Know too much about building hi-rises to buy that pantload...

Yeah, you know too much...


You know more than Frank A. Demartini, on-site construction manager for the World Trade Center, who spoke of the resilience of the towers in an interview recorded on January 25, 2001: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sO1JxpVb2eU

The building was designed to have a fully loaded 707 crash into it. That was the largest plane at the time. I believe that the building probably could sustain multiple impacts of jetliners because this structure is like the mosquito netting on your screen door -- this intense grid -- and the jet plane is just a pencil puncturing that screen netting. It really does nothing to the screen netting.

?

Ok, sometimes engineers can be wrong, but what about the building that wasn't hit by a plane but collapsed in the exact same way? http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GEPjOi2dQSM