Alex Jones

[Dr.Dank]

mid spring...

However you are making it seem as though this thread was a conspiracy to advertise Casey Jones

Tell you what... If I manage to breed a strain that makes you see things that aren't there, I'll name it Alex Jones

Haha your a funny guy cool I'm looking forward, they seem to run out as quick as i smoke my stash thats that is damn fast I hear great things about her and I'm glad you speak your mind thats the way it should be.

 

[igrowwitmatches]

i love crazy people

 

[Grat3fulh3ad]

I'm glad you speak your mind thats the way it should be.

likewise

 

[FarOut1]

a question for Grat3fulh3ad

Was 911 an inside job or not?

 

[Grat3fulh3ad]

Well, I'm not CIA or FBI or KGB or MI6 or anything...
But my contacts tell me that it was not an inside job, but it also was not done by the men who got blamed...

 

[FarOut1]

your connections are they adsl like mine lol

somebody got in that building 7 and did some explosive work i belive the same boyz were in the towers but they were hit by planes so just to avoid argument with anybody, i go for building 7 that fell many hrs after the towers were hit. If you see how she went down it cant be anything but demo work.

Peace

 

[motaco]

Scares me to death. People are so clueless.

The problem is everything these days is so ambiguous and multifaceted that the "truth" is a pretty ambiguous thing itself. Just ask someone why we are in Iraq and the confusion people are in becomes clear. It's because Bush orchestrated 911 for a plot to gain global power. No it's because Islam hates freedom. No it's because... blah blah. Clueless people.

It's just like when we have talking points about the bailout, federal reserve, health care system. etc. That stuff is pretty complex and the average guy doesn't know anything about it. So the republicans change it to something like "fags are getting married!".

Well you can be a complete idiot and not know anything but you can still have a strong opinion on whether gays can marry. So the election becomes about gays getting married. And then tons of republicans who weren't coming out of the wood work about issues that involve being informed, will come out fervently.

Alex Jones is the same thing on the other side. I won't be mean about it, but I'll leave it at this. If you think Bush (or skull and bones- excuse me!) orchestrated 9/11 in an attempt for the New World Order (a shadowy quasi government agency that rules the world) to gain global power for 2012...

Well I'm sorry but to put it bluntly I'd have to say you just don't understand the world you live in. Just like the tea baggers. And you bought into a guy who is willing to try to convince you of the opposite.

It's those ivory league educated economists, and political science majors that are all fooled. But they'll see in 2012!

Yeah. Right. I'm sure that is cathartic for you but it's nonsense.

 

[Grat3fulh3ad]

You've seen the photos of all the structural damage to 7WTC's south face, right?
Please read this entire page, and then come back and tell me you still think there is evidence of WTC7 being a controlled demolition. It references Alex Jones a few times.
http://www.debunking911.com/pull.htm
Don't immediately discount it because it disagrees with your ideas about what happened, please... I looked at Alex Jones' 9/11 info, please look at this response.

 

[cork144]

grat3

first 3 buildings to ever fall due to fire were

tower 1 tower 2 tower 7

tower 1 and 2 were designed to take planes hitting into them.

they fell semetrically into their own footprint.

they fell at neer free fall speed 15 seconds to collapse entirely.

pancake theory + law of conservation of mommentum would predict 45 seconds, 30 second gap, for both tower one and two.

concrete was blown into dust, not chunks.

the dust cloud accounted for 80% of the concrete from the towers.

tower 7 had fire on 3 floors, was burning for afew hours and fell with a classic crimp at the top, it also fell at neer free fall speed into its own footprint.

there was a countdown for the collapse of tower 7, starting from ten.

BBC reported the collapse of tower 7 atleast twenty minutes before the actual collapse.

they claimed no blackboxes were found, evidence has shown they had atleast 3.

traces on all of the beams and in the dust showed the use of super powerfull explosives.

 

[Grat3fulh3ad]

So you're not gonna read it... right on

 

[Grat3fulh3ad]

grat3

first 3 buildings to ever fall due to fire were

tower 1 tower 2 tower 7

tower 1 and 2 were designed to take planes hitting into them.

they fell semetrically into their own footprint.

they fell at neer free fall speed 15 seconds to collapse entirely.

pancake theory + law of conservation of mommentum would predict 45 seconds, 30 second gap, for both tower one and two.

concrete was blown into dust, not chunks.

the dust cloud accounted for 80% of the concrete from the towers.

tower 7 had fire on 3 floors, was burning for afew hours and fell with a classic crimp at the top, it also fell at neer free fall speed into its own footprint.

there was a countdown for the collapse of tower 7, starting from ten.

BBC reported the collapse of tower 7 atleast twenty minutes before the actual collapse.

they claimed no blackboxes were found, evidence has shown they had atleast 3.

traces on all of the beams and in the dust showed the use of super powerfull explosives.

http://www.debunking911.com/pull.htm
All that is easily debunked... sorry... a lot of it is simply disinformation.

First and most obvious...
Neither wtc 1 nor 2 nor 7 was brought Down solely by fire... 1 and 2 were both hit pretty hard by aircraft and 7 was hit by bldg 1 which destroyed a large portion of the south face.

 

[cork144]

AHAHAHAHA

OH MY

i guess jet fuel burns hot enough to melt steel too

LMAO

 

[alaskan]

http://www.debunking911.com/pull.htm
All that is easily debunked... sorry... a lot of it is simply disinformation.

"Easily debunked" by you, or by the people whose headlines you're parroting?

 

[cork144]

super thermate pouring from the towers

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OmuzyWC60eE&feature=related

just afew minutes before the collapse too!

i suppose these elites were fighting against are good huh?

using 3000 peoples lives to take freedoms away,

3000 lives they played appart in killing.


people seem to think they wouldnt do this, YOU wouldnt do this, THEY DID and if the purpose suits them THEY WILL AGAIN.

 

[Grat3fulh3ad]

I've worked in high-rise construction...

I've seen engineers make erectors remove and scrap steel framing members, because the beams had been "heat cambered" and the heat used changes the steel's structural integrity...

When I first began building high rises back in the early 90s I asked why all of the steel had to be coated with fireproofing... It was to prevent structural failure in a fire...

In the course of framing out individual floors with non structural partition walls, I have removed fireproofing from steel to mechanically attach a framing member... The fireproofing sticks very well, until you expose metal, then you can knock it off in pieces easily...

It is easy for me to see how the impact and explosion could have blown the fireproofing off of enough steel members to cause collapse...

 

[Grat3fulh3ad]

AHAHAHAHA

OH MY

i guess jet fuel burns hot enough to melt steel too

LMAO

you don't understand structural steel very well, eh?

Why would the steel have needed to melt?

 

[Grat3fulh3ad]

"Easily debunked" by you, or by the people whose headlines you're parroting?

lmao... I never said I could debunk it all from my own research... why re-invent the wheel...lol

Did you come up with the demolition theory or are you just a pot calling a kettle something?

 

[cork144]

then explain why the flaws unexposed to fire still gave way, the building was designed in 3 sections, so that the weaker ones would fall off the sturdier base structure.

i realy do suggest you start looking into this one, this is easyer to see than the global warming scam, and you can look at what has come as the biproduct of this event and question if it is good or not.

 

[Grat3fulh3ad]

So... CORK... your mind is closed and you WILL NOT read the info at my link...

right on... The debunking is all there, but like in the other thread, you will not consider fact which does not support your theories... cool... no skin off of my nose...

 

[alaskan]

you don't understand structural steel very well, eh?

Why would the steel have needed to melt?

Because even the wtc7 building -that wasn't hit with a a plane full of fuel- fell symmetrically straight down?

Because multiple similar buildings have burned longer and hotter before and since then, and didn't even hint at toppling- let alone straight down into themselves, evenly through every floor...