Does multiple packages constitute sales?

[kmk420kali]

I'm pretty sure we are all aware of that ruling and I'm even more sure that most of us understand the status quo is STILL the status quo UNTIL the court formally presents that written ruling, which it hasn't yet.

Until then, 8 oz per.

How about the rest of what I wrote??
The State Law is only the MINIMUM that is allowed...Counties may raise that--
But yeah...nice try at fragmenting an argument...again--

 

[JITAMON]

SHOW ME THE RULING. Someone show me court precedence that 8 oz is the limit in Ca. Until then STFU with the personal fighting.
If the District of Columbia, which is a federally ruled district just OK'd Medical mARIJUANA fu TO DA feds, Then all the arguments about state vs federal LEO is null and void. Arguments for the sake of energy or time are no longer valid. PROOF IS IN DA PUDDING!!
The federal gov IS allowing Medical mJ ENOUGH SAID

http://copssaylegalize.blogspot.com/...-congress.htm

 

[Blue Dot]

SHOW ME THE RULING. Someone show me court precedence that 8 oz is the limit in Ca.

There doesn't have to be a ruling.

SB420 is an actual law. It amends the H&S code, which is law.

11362.77. (a) A qualified patient or primary caregiver may possess no more than eight ounces of dried marijuana per qualified patient. In addition, a qualified patient or primary caregiver may also maintain no more than six mature or 12 immature marijuana plants per qualified patient.

So far, nothing has changed since this law was enacted so it still stands as is.

 

[kmk420kali]

There doesn't have to be a ruling.

SB420 is an actual law. It amends the H&S code, which is law.



So far, nothing has changed since this law was enacted so it still stands as is.

You are wrong-- Prop 215 is a Law...it was voted on by the People--
SB420 is a Senate Bill...and altho it can Amend a Law, it cannot restrict it--
Next??

 

[Blue Dot]

You are wrong-- Prop 215 is a Law...it was voted on by the People--
SB420 is a Senate Bill...and altho it can Amend a Law, it cannot restrict it--
Next??

and since 215 said nothing about limits sb420 couldn't possibly be restricting it could it?

Now, obviously the court recently said otherwise, BUT UNTIL THEY PUBLISH THEIR DECESION sb420 is indeed a law (albeit by amendment). It's part of the H&S code which is the same law that makes MJ illegal in the first place.

The Senate did indeed amend the law without the vote of the people.

 

[kmk420kali]

and since 215 said nothing about limitsthe it couldn't possibly be restricting it could it?

Now, obviously the court recently said otherwise, BUT UNTIL THEY PUBLISH THEIR DECESION sb420 is indeed a law. It's part of the H&S code which is the same law that makes MJ illegal in the first place.

The legislatures did indeed make a law without the vote of the people.

I notice on many articles that you comment on, you start it out by saying, "I didn't read all of that but...."
If you don't read it all, you are ignorant....STFU--

You are ignorant--
Notice I used a word that is not "flamining" you...simply an accurate assessment--
This is going to be held as Unconstitutional...and you know it-- You are grasping at straws...trying to help spread the Fear--
We will see in time, who is right...but then, when that happens, you will not respond...like every other time you get proven wrong--

 

[Blue Dot]

You are ignorant--
Notice I used a word that is not "flamining" you...simply an accurate assessment--
This is going to be held as Unconstitutional...and you know it-- You are grasping at straws...trying to help spread the Fear--
We will see in time, who is right...but then, when that happens, you will not respond...like every other time you get proven wrong--

Huh?

I ADMITTED that the senate did indeed unconstituionally amend a voter iniative and this was unconstituitonal and the court is correct but that doesn't change the fact that sb420 was indeed law up to when the court made it's ruling AND when it finally posts it ruling.

 

[kmk420kali]

Huh?

I ADMITTED that the senate did indeed unconstituionally amend a voter iniative and this was unconstituitonal and the court is correct but that doesn't change the fact that sb420 was indeed law up to when the court made it's ruling AND when it finally posts it ruling.

If they unconstitutionally amended it...it was never Law--
I don't care what the paperwork says they can do...it was an illegal law, and it should not be recognized--
This is why Eddy is in jail now...he had a chance to run, and he refused!! He is fighting an unjust Law...and so am I--
I will never say that they are right on this...not because I am stubborn...you have seen me admit when I am wrong...I am not wrong--
Fuck Illegal Laws-- We do not need to follow them, if we do, we are illegal--

 

[JITAMON]

YOU TWO my GOD. There are valid points being discussed and I only wanna discuss current rulings, not opinions. GOT IT
If the feds and the states are agreeing how to proceed, I see it as a positive thing. The facts are there for that one. I see it, it's just how much you know and how you use your rights in court . Getup standup. No one has to run.

If they unconstitutionally amended it...it was never Law--

The Supreme court said the same thing, thanks bro

 

[Hammerhead]

I do belive your doctor can recomend a larger ammout for use? also in Humbolt you can have 99 plants.